最终用户:对文献的评估和回顾

D. Nicholas , J. Harman
{"title":"最终用户:对文献的评估和回顾","authors":"D. Nicholas ,&nbsp;J. Harman","doi":"10.1016/0143-6236(85)90026-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is argued that end-users are an ever-increasing and potentially enormous market for online information systems. Yet it is not clear how widespread end-user searching is already; what makes some people do their own searching, but not others; what problems they encounter when conducting online searches; and whether technical developments in the pipeline are likely to make the intermediary redundant.</p><p>A review of the literature is undertaken to discover whether researchers are providing us with answers to these and related questions. Their findings—contradictory in places—indicate that: end-user searching flourishes most in fields where users were active searchers of manual/hardcopy services; the prospect of total and unimpeded access to information is not as potent alure as many have thought; and that end-user searching poses little immediate threat to the intermediary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":85535,"journal":{"name":"Social science information studies : SSIS","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 173-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-6236(85)90026-2","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The end-user: An assessment and review of the literature\",\"authors\":\"D. Nicholas ,&nbsp;J. Harman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0143-6236(85)90026-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is argued that end-users are an ever-increasing and potentially enormous market for online information systems. Yet it is not clear how widespread end-user searching is already; what makes some people do their own searching, but not others; what problems they encounter when conducting online searches; and whether technical developments in the pipeline are likely to make the intermediary redundant.</p><p>A review of the literature is undertaken to discover whether researchers are providing us with answers to these and related questions. Their findings—contradictory in places—indicate that: end-user searching flourishes most in fields where users were active searchers of manual/hardcopy services; the prospect of total and unimpeded access to information is not as potent alure as many have thought; and that end-user searching poses little immediate threat to the intermediary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science information studies : SSIS\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 173-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-6236(85)90026-2\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science information studies : SSIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143623685900262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science information studies : SSIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143623685900262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

有人认为,终端用户是在线信息系统不断增长的潜在巨大市场。然而,目前还不清楚终端用户搜索的普及程度;是什么让一些人自己搜索,而其他人不做?他们在进行网上搜索时会遇到什么问题?以及未来的技术发展是否会使中介机构变得多余。对文献进行回顾,以发现研究人员是否为我们提供了这些问题和相关问题的答案。他们的发现——有些地方是矛盾的——表明:终端用户搜索在用户是手动/硬拷贝服务的活跃搜索者的领域最为繁荣;全面和不受阻碍地获取信息的前景并不像许多人想象的那样具有强大的价值;而且,终端用户的搜索几乎不会对中介构成直接威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The end-user: An assessment and review of the literature

It is argued that end-users are an ever-increasing and potentially enormous market for online information systems. Yet it is not clear how widespread end-user searching is already; what makes some people do their own searching, but not others; what problems they encounter when conducting online searches; and whether technical developments in the pipeline are likely to make the intermediary redundant.

A review of the literature is undertaken to discover whether researchers are providing us with answers to these and related questions. Their findings—contradictory in places—indicate that: end-user searching flourishes most in fields where users were active searchers of manual/hardcopy services; the prospect of total and unimpeded access to information is not as potent alure as many have thought; and that end-user searching poses little immediate threat to the intermediary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信