结构动力学分析的勒让德谱有限元

M. Sprague, T. L. Geers
{"title":"结构动力学分析的勒让德谱有限元","authors":"M. Sprague, T. L. Geers","doi":"10.1002/CNM.1086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spectral, hierarchical, and h-type finite elements (FEs) are compared in the context of their application to structural dynamics analysis. The Timoshenko beam, which is the 1-D analog of Mindlin-type shell elements, is used for comparison in eigenvalue and transient-response analyses. A detailed formulation of each method is presented to illustrate clearly their fundamental differences. The principal advantages of spectral FEs over low-order h-type elements are (a) far superior accuracy for a fixed number of model degrees of freedom (DOF) and (b) much higher computational efficiency at a fixed accuracy level. The principal advantages over hierarchical p-type elements are (a) a mass matrix that is inherently diagonal as opposed to full, (b) DOF that pertain directly to nodal displacements and rotations, and (c) more efficient tensor-product factorization. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":51245,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/CNM.1086","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legendre spectral finite elements for structural dynamics analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Sprague, T. L. Geers\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/CNM.1086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spectral, hierarchical, and h-type finite elements (FEs) are compared in the context of their application to structural dynamics analysis. The Timoshenko beam, which is the 1-D analog of Mindlin-type shell elements, is used for comparison in eigenvalue and transient-response analyses. A detailed formulation of each method is presented to illustrate clearly their fundamental differences. The principal advantages of spectral FEs over low-order h-type elements are (a) far superior accuracy for a fixed number of model degrees of freedom (DOF) and (b) much higher computational efficiency at a fixed accuracy level. The principal advantages over hierarchical p-type elements are (a) a mass matrix that is inherently diagonal as opposed to full, (b) DOF that pertain directly to nodal displacements and rotations, and (c) more efficient tensor-product factorization. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/CNM.1086\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/CNM.1086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/CNM.1086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

光谱,层次,和h型有限元(FEs)在其应用于结构动力学分析的背景下进行比较。在本征值分析和瞬态响应分析中,采用与mindlin型壳单元一维相似的Timoshenko梁进行比较。本文详细阐述了每种方法,以清楚地说明它们的根本区别。与低阶h型元素相比,谱FEs的主要优点是:(a)在固定数量的模型自由度(DOF)下具有更高的精度;(b)在固定精度水平下具有更高的计算效率。与分层p型元素相比,主要优点是(a)质量矩阵本质上是对角的,而不是满的,(b)直接与节点位移和旋转相关的自由度,以及(c)更有效的张量积分解。版权所有©2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legendre spectral finite elements for structural dynamics analysis
Spectral, hierarchical, and h-type finite elements (FEs) are compared in the context of their application to structural dynamics analysis. The Timoshenko beam, which is the 1-D analog of Mindlin-type shell elements, is used for comparison in eigenvalue and transient-response analyses. A detailed formulation of each method is presented to illustrate clearly their fundamental differences. The principal advantages of spectral FEs over low-order h-type elements are (a) far superior accuracy for a fixed number of model degrees of freedom (DOF) and (b) much higher computational efficiency at a fixed accuracy level. The principal advantages over hierarchical p-type elements are (a) a mass matrix that is inherently diagonal as opposed to full, (b) DOF that pertain directly to nodal displacements and rotations, and (c) more efficient tensor-product factorization. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信