透析护理:三十年后

Andrew Z. Fenves MD
{"title":"透析护理:三十年后","authors":"Andrew Z. Fenves MD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is a classic article by Hampers and Hager in 1979 commenting on the delivery of dialysis services in the United States. Looking back some 32 years later, there are several fascinating aspects of this treatise.</p><p>First, the authors make a strong and passionate case for the delivery of outpatient dialysis services by the proprietary (for-profit) business entities in the U.S. This is particularly poignant today as the discussion and arguments are similar now just as they were then, and with the looming of the new healthcare bill recently passed by Congress the supporters and opponents of that bill are just as emotional and unyielding as we sensed in this paper. The specifics of the authors' arguments may no longer be relevant, but the general philosophy they outline is just as compelling today to some thought leaders as they were three decades ago.</p><p>Additionally, as the authors correctly predicted, the for-profit sector is winning the dialysis services battle, as illustrated by the ongoing consolidation in this arena by the large for-profit companies.</p><p>I could not help but smile when I read that federal health expenditures in 1976 represented 9.7% of the federal budget ($44.5 billion). What we would give today to have such a “low” percentage? Similarly, the median age of hemodialysis patients was around 51 years of age, a number we left in the dust long ago. The article also expressed the desire to move hemodialysis patients to home care as much as possible, an effort which is again gaining momentum in our country.</p><p>Despite the age of this article and the loss of relevance of some of its content, this is a remarkable commentary on the entire dialysis industry, and still rings mostly true today. It also gives us a unique retrospective on the evolution of the ESRD Program.</p>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 10","pages":"457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20630","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dialysis care: Three decades later\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Z. Fenves MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dat.20630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This is a classic article by Hampers and Hager in 1979 commenting on the delivery of dialysis services in the United States. Looking back some 32 years later, there are several fascinating aspects of this treatise.</p><p>First, the authors make a strong and passionate case for the delivery of outpatient dialysis services by the proprietary (for-profit) business entities in the U.S. This is particularly poignant today as the discussion and arguments are similar now just as they were then, and with the looming of the new healthcare bill recently passed by Congress the supporters and opponents of that bill are just as emotional and unyielding as we sensed in this paper. The specifics of the authors' arguments may no longer be relevant, but the general philosophy they outline is just as compelling today to some thought leaders as they were three decades ago.</p><p>Additionally, as the authors correctly predicted, the for-profit sector is winning the dialysis services battle, as illustrated by the ongoing consolidation in this arena by the large for-profit companies.</p><p>I could not help but smile when I read that federal health expenditures in 1976 represented 9.7% of the federal budget ($44.5 billion). What we would give today to have such a “low” percentage? Similarly, the median age of hemodialysis patients was around 51 years of age, a number we left in the dust long ago. The article also expressed the desire to move hemodialysis patients to home care as much as possible, an effort which is again gaining momentum in our country.</p><p>Despite the age of this article and the loss of relevance of some of its content, this is a remarkable commentary on the entire dialysis industry, and still rings mostly true today. It also gives us a unique retrospective on the evolution of the ESRD Program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialysis & Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"40 10\",\"pages\":\"457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20630\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialysis & Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dat.20630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialysis & Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dat.20630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是Hampers和Hager在1979年发表的一篇评论美国透析服务的经典文章。回首32年后,这篇论文有几个引人入胜的方面。首先,作者对美国的私有(营利)商业实体提供门诊透析服务进行了强烈而充满激情的论证,这在今天尤其令人心酸,因为现在的讨论和争论与当时一样相似,而且随着国会最近通过的新医疗法案的临近,该法案的支持者和反对者就像我们在本文中感受到的那样情绪激动,不屈不挠。作者的论点的细节可能不再相关,但他们概述的一般哲学在今天对一些思想领袖来说就像30年前一样令人信服。此外,正如作者正确预测的那样,营利性部门正在赢得透析服务之战,正如大型营利性公司在这一领域的持续整合所说明的那样。当我读到1976年联邦医疗支出占联邦预算的9.7%(445亿美元)时,我忍不住笑了。我们今天会给这么“低”的百分比吗?同样,血液透析患者的中位年龄在51岁左右,这个数字我们早就落在了后面。文章还表达了将血液透析患者尽可能转移到家庭护理的愿望,这一努力在我国再次获得动力。尽管这篇文章的年代久远,一些内容失去了相关性,但这是对整个透析行业的一篇了不起的评论,今天仍然是真实的。它也给了我们一个独特的回顾发展的ESRD计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dialysis care: Three decades later

This is a classic article by Hampers and Hager in 1979 commenting on the delivery of dialysis services in the United States. Looking back some 32 years later, there are several fascinating aspects of this treatise.

First, the authors make a strong and passionate case for the delivery of outpatient dialysis services by the proprietary (for-profit) business entities in the U.S. This is particularly poignant today as the discussion and arguments are similar now just as they were then, and with the looming of the new healthcare bill recently passed by Congress the supporters and opponents of that bill are just as emotional and unyielding as we sensed in this paper. The specifics of the authors' arguments may no longer be relevant, but the general philosophy they outline is just as compelling today to some thought leaders as they were three decades ago.

Additionally, as the authors correctly predicted, the for-profit sector is winning the dialysis services battle, as illustrated by the ongoing consolidation in this arena by the large for-profit companies.

I could not help but smile when I read that federal health expenditures in 1976 represented 9.7% of the federal budget ($44.5 billion). What we would give today to have such a “low” percentage? Similarly, the median age of hemodialysis patients was around 51 years of age, a number we left in the dust long ago. The article also expressed the desire to move hemodialysis patients to home care as much as possible, an effort which is again gaining momentum in our country.

Despite the age of this article and the loss of relevance of some of its content, this is a remarkable commentary on the entire dialysis industry, and still rings mostly true today. It also gives us a unique retrospective on the evolution of the ESRD Program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dialysis & Transplantation
Dialysis & Transplantation 医学-工程:生物医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信