毛细管电泳分析草药提取物中酚类化合物的电解质体系的关键评估

Fabiana Novaes Fonseca, Massuo Jorge Kato, Levi Oliveira Jr., Nestor Pinto Neto, Marina Franco Maggi Tavares
{"title":"毛细管电泳分析草药提取物中酚类化合物的电解质体系的关键评估","authors":"Fabiana Novaes Fonseca,&nbsp;Massuo Jorge Kato,&nbsp;Levi Oliveira Jr.,&nbsp;Nestor Pinto Neto,&nbsp;Marina Franco Maggi Tavares","doi":"10.1002/mcs.1047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This work presents a comparative evaluation of electrolyte systems for the capillary electrophoresis analysis of the phenolic compounds apigenin and luteolin, and their corresponding 7-<i>O</i>-glucosides naringenin, rutin, quercetin, umbelliferone, herniarin, chlorogenic, and caffeic acids, in methanolic, glycolic, and hydroalcoholic extracts of <i>Matricaria recutita</i> L. (Asteraceae). The electrolytes included tetraborate buffer at different pHs and concentrations, containing varied amounts of sodium dodecyl sulfate, β-cyclodextrin, and acetonitrile. The electrophoretic profile of the extracts changes considerably from electrolyte to electrolyte. However, in a single electrolyte, the profile of different extracts seems to be very similar (identical elution order), varying only in relative composition. The best condition for quantitative work was 20 mmol/L tetraborate buffer, pH 10, using direct detection at 337 nm. Baseline resolution of 9 among 11 selected standards was achieved readily in this electrolyte, showing distinct migration patterns for flavonoid aglycones (flavones, dihydroflavonols, and flavonols), coumarins, and acidic phenylpropanoids. To assure reproducibility, several capillary conditioning procedures were tested. Electrokinetic rinses with tetraborate buffer prior to sample injection gave the best results. Precision of migration times and peak areas were better than 4 and 2%, respectively, for 10 consecutive injections of the methanolic extract. A few method validation parameters also are reported, such as linearity (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>&lt;0.999, concentration range from 5.0 to 75.0 μg/mL), limit of detection (3.8 μg/mL), and limit of quantitation (11.5 μg/mL), referred to apigenin, a commonly used compound to standardize chamomile extracts for topical use. Flavonoid glucosides that have distinct sugar moieties were separated readily in free solution; however, those with similar sugar moieties were separated only in micellar medium, using β-cyclodextrin as the additive. The presence of reference compounds in the extracts was confirmed by spiking techniques and their identification was assisted by a UV-spectra library. The validity of the diode array detector as an identification tool for phenolic compounds also is discussed. © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Micro Sep 13: 227–235, 2001</p>","PeriodicalId":83120,"journal":{"name":"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS","volume":"13 6","pages":"227-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcs.1047","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical assessment of electrolyte systems for the capillary electrophoresis analysis of phenolic compounds in herbal extracts\",\"authors\":\"Fabiana Novaes Fonseca,&nbsp;Massuo Jorge Kato,&nbsp;Levi Oliveira Jr.,&nbsp;Nestor Pinto Neto,&nbsp;Marina Franco Maggi Tavares\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mcs.1047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This work presents a comparative evaluation of electrolyte systems for the capillary electrophoresis analysis of the phenolic compounds apigenin and luteolin, and their corresponding 7-<i>O</i>-glucosides naringenin, rutin, quercetin, umbelliferone, herniarin, chlorogenic, and caffeic acids, in methanolic, glycolic, and hydroalcoholic extracts of <i>Matricaria recutita</i> L. (Asteraceae). The electrolytes included tetraborate buffer at different pHs and concentrations, containing varied amounts of sodium dodecyl sulfate, β-cyclodextrin, and acetonitrile. The electrophoretic profile of the extracts changes considerably from electrolyte to electrolyte. However, in a single electrolyte, the profile of different extracts seems to be very similar (identical elution order), varying only in relative composition. The best condition for quantitative work was 20 mmol/L tetraborate buffer, pH 10, using direct detection at 337 nm. Baseline resolution of 9 among 11 selected standards was achieved readily in this electrolyte, showing distinct migration patterns for flavonoid aglycones (flavones, dihydroflavonols, and flavonols), coumarins, and acidic phenylpropanoids. To assure reproducibility, several capillary conditioning procedures were tested. Electrokinetic rinses with tetraborate buffer prior to sample injection gave the best results. Precision of migration times and peak areas were better than 4 and 2%, respectively, for 10 consecutive injections of the methanolic extract. A few method validation parameters also are reported, such as linearity (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup>&lt;0.999, concentration range from 5.0 to 75.0 μg/mL), limit of detection (3.8 μg/mL), and limit of quantitation (11.5 μg/mL), referred to apigenin, a commonly used compound to standardize chamomile extracts for topical use. Flavonoid glucosides that have distinct sugar moieties were separated readily in free solution; however, those with similar sugar moieties were separated only in micellar medium, using β-cyclodextrin as the additive. The presence of reference compounds in the extracts was confirmed by spiking techniques and their identification was assisted by a UV-spectra library. The validity of the diode array detector as an identification tool for phenolic compounds also is discussed. © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Micro Sep 13: 227–235, 2001</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"227-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/mcs.1047\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcs.1047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mcs.1047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

本文介绍了毛细管电泳分析的电解质体系的比较评价,分析了鸢尾草(Asteraceae)的甲醇、乙醇酸和水醇提取物中酚类化合物芹菜素和木犀草素及其对应的7- o -糖苷柚皮苷、芦丁、槲皮素、伞草酮、herniarin、绿原和咖啡酸。电解质包括不同ph值和浓度的四硼酸钠缓冲液,含有不同量的十二烷基硫酸钠、β-环糊精和乙腈。在不同的电解质中,提取物的电泳谱变化很大。然而,在单一的电解质中,不同提取物的轮廓似乎非常相似(相同的洗脱顺序),只是相对组成不同。定量工作的最佳条件为20 mmol/L四硼酸缓冲液,pH为10,直接检测波长为337 nm。在所选的11个标准品中,9个标准品的基线分辨率在该电解质中很容易达到,显示出不同的类黄酮苷元(黄酮、二氢黄酮醇和黄酮醇)、香豆素和酸性苯丙素的迁移模式。为了保证再现性,测试了几种毛细管调节程序。样品进样前用四硼酸缓冲液进行电动冲洗,效果最好。连续10次注射甲醇提取物,迁移次数和峰面积的精度分别优于4%和2%。本文还报道了一些方法的验证参数,如线性(r2<0.999,浓度范围为5.0 ~ 75.0 μg/mL),检测限(3.8 μg/mL)和定量限(11.5 μg/mL),涉及芹菜素(一种常用的用于规范洋甘菊外用提取物的化合物)。具有不同糖段的类黄酮苷在游离溶液中容易分离;而用β-环糊精作为添加剂,只能在胶束介质中分离出糖基相似的分子。通过峰化技术确定了参比化合物的存在,并利用紫外光谱库辅助鉴定。本文还讨论了二极管阵列检测器作为酚类化合物鉴别工具的有效性。©2001 John Wiley &[J] .中国机械工程,2001
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical assessment of electrolyte systems for the capillary electrophoresis analysis of phenolic compounds in herbal extracts

This work presents a comparative evaluation of electrolyte systems for the capillary electrophoresis analysis of the phenolic compounds apigenin and luteolin, and their corresponding 7-O-glucosides naringenin, rutin, quercetin, umbelliferone, herniarin, chlorogenic, and caffeic acids, in methanolic, glycolic, and hydroalcoholic extracts of Matricaria recutita L. (Asteraceae). The electrolytes included tetraborate buffer at different pHs and concentrations, containing varied amounts of sodium dodecyl sulfate, β-cyclodextrin, and acetonitrile. The electrophoretic profile of the extracts changes considerably from electrolyte to electrolyte. However, in a single electrolyte, the profile of different extracts seems to be very similar (identical elution order), varying only in relative composition. The best condition for quantitative work was 20 mmol/L tetraborate buffer, pH 10, using direct detection at 337 nm. Baseline resolution of 9 among 11 selected standards was achieved readily in this electrolyte, showing distinct migration patterns for flavonoid aglycones (flavones, dihydroflavonols, and flavonols), coumarins, and acidic phenylpropanoids. To assure reproducibility, several capillary conditioning procedures were tested. Electrokinetic rinses with tetraborate buffer prior to sample injection gave the best results. Precision of migration times and peak areas were better than 4 and 2%, respectively, for 10 consecutive injections of the methanolic extract. A few method validation parameters also are reported, such as linearity (r2<0.999, concentration range from 5.0 to 75.0 μg/mL), limit of detection (3.8 μg/mL), and limit of quantitation (11.5 μg/mL), referred to apigenin, a commonly used compound to standardize chamomile extracts for topical use. Flavonoid glucosides that have distinct sugar moieties were separated readily in free solution; however, those with similar sugar moieties were separated only in micellar medium, using β-cyclodextrin as the additive. The presence of reference compounds in the extracts was confirmed by spiking techniques and their identification was assisted by a UV-spectra library. The validity of the diode array detector as an identification tool for phenolic compounds also is discussed. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Micro Sep 13: 227–235, 2001

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信