加强糖尿病住院病人护理:势头增强

M. Cummings
{"title":"加强糖尿病住院病人护理:势头增强","authors":"M. Cummings","doi":"10.1002/PDI.1558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"reactive. A hospital ward recognises there is a problem with a patient’s diabetes care (who has often been admitted with a diagnosis unrelated to their diabetes) and summons specialist help. The problem with this approach is several fold. Firstly, it relies upon a ward recognising there is a problem. Many hospital health care professionals still do not recognise the relationship between good glycaemic control and improved wound healing rates, quicker resolution of sepsis and other conditions that rely upon phagocyte function. Secondly, if the specialist team are contacted for advice it is often too late, several days after admission when metabolic control could have been targeted earlier with more clinical impact. Thirdly, these patients with diabetes often have other unrecognised diabetes related comorb idities that could have benefited from diabetes specialist review. Fourthly, many of these patients may have been on intravenous insulin sliding scales unnecessarily (potentially delaying discharge from hospital, increasing costs and the need for nursing support), experienced unnecessary hypoglycaemic episodes and be exposed to drug errors that could have been avoided (incorrect type and timing of insulin being particular favourites). All of these problems impact upon quality of care, costs of hospital care and delay hospital discharges. The magnitude of this problem should not be underestimated since 15–20% of inpatients have concomitant diabetes. Given the above observations, it is heartening to see that there is growing recognition of the value of prospective diabetes inpatient care at a national level through NHS Diabetes, Diabetes UK and other organisations. This has arisen with the results of a number of studies which have clearly demonstrated the benefits of prospective diabetes specialist involvement. The article by Andrew Brooks and colleagues (page xxx) continues to support this approach with an average reduction in length of stay exceeding five days per patient with diabetes (with a primary diagnosis of diabetes) and significant reduction in prescription and management errors through multi-professional twice-weekly whole hospital visits. Thankfully, wider recognition and value of this approach towards inpatient diabetes care are emerging within the NHS and our own department were recently awarded the National Winners, NHS Health and Social Care Awards 2010, for our prospective diabetes hospital service. At a time when hospital capacity is severely stretched over winter months, diabetes specialist teams can have an important role to play in diabetes care, improving care quality and also impacting upon duration of hospital stay. All hospital diabetes teams should now be given the opportunity to provide this prospective care with dedicated time to deliver this service. The evidence is unequivocal.","PeriodicalId":92116,"journal":{"name":"Practical diabetes international : the journal for diabetes care teams worldwide","volume":"48 5","pages":"59-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/PDI.1558","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing diabetes inpatient care: the momentum increases\",\"authors\":\"M. Cummings\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/PDI.1558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"reactive. A hospital ward recognises there is a problem with a patient’s diabetes care (who has often been admitted with a diagnosis unrelated to their diabetes) and summons specialist help. The problem with this approach is several fold. Firstly, it relies upon a ward recognising there is a problem. Many hospital health care professionals still do not recognise the relationship between good glycaemic control and improved wound healing rates, quicker resolution of sepsis and other conditions that rely upon phagocyte function. Secondly, if the specialist team are contacted for advice it is often too late, several days after admission when metabolic control could have been targeted earlier with more clinical impact. Thirdly, these patients with diabetes often have other unrecognised diabetes related comorb idities that could have benefited from diabetes specialist review. Fourthly, many of these patients may have been on intravenous insulin sliding scales unnecessarily (potentially delaying discharge from hospital, increasing costs and the need for nursing support), experienced unnecessary hypoglycaemic episodes and be exposed to drug errors that could have been avoided (incorrect type and timing of insulin being particular favourites). All of these problems impact upon quality of care, costs of hospital care and delay hospital discharges. The magnitude of this problem should not be underestimated since 15–20% of inpatients have concomitant diabetes. Given the above observations, it is heartening to see that there is growing recognition of the value of prospective diabetes inpatient care at a national level through NHS Diabetes, Diabetes UK and other organisations. This has arisen with the results of a number of studies which have clearly demonstrated the benefits of prospective diabetes specialist involvement. The article by Andrew Brooks and colleagues (page xxx) continues to support this approach with an average reduction in length of stay exceeding five days per patient with diabetes (with a primary diagnosis of diabetes) and significant reduction in prescription and management errors through multi-professional twice-weekly whole hospital visits. Thankfully, wider recognition and value of this approach towards inpatient diabetes care are emerging within the NHS and our own department were recently awarded the National Winners, NHS Health and Social Care Awards 2010, for our prospective diabetes hospital service. At a time when hospital capacity is severely stretched over winter months, diabetes specialist teams can have an important role to play in diabetes care, improving care quality and also impacting upon duration of hospital stay. All hospital diabetes teams should now be given the opportunity to provide this prospective care with dedicated time to deliver this service. The evidence is unequivocal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical diabetes international : the journal for diabetes care teams worldwide\",\"volume\":\"48 5\",\"pages\":\"59-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/PDI.1558\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical diabetes international : the journal for diabetes care teams worldwide\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/PDI.1558\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical diabetes international : the journal for diabetes care teams worldwide","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/PDI.1558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反应性。医院病房发现患者的糖尿病护理有问题(患者入院时的诊断通常与他们的糖尿病无关),并召唤专家帮助。这种方法的问题是多方面的。首先,它依赖于病房意识到存在问题。许多医院的卫生保健专业人员仍然没有认识到良好的血糖控制与改善伤口愈合率、更快地解决败血症和其他依赖吞噬细胞功能的疾病之间的关系。其次,如果联系专家团队寻求建议,通常为时已晚,在入院后几天,本可以更早地针对代谢控制,产生更大的临床影响。第三,这些糖尿病患者通常有其他未被识别的糖尿病相关合并症,这些合并症本可以从糖尿病专家的检查中获益。第四,这些患者中的许多人可能不必要地使用了静脉注射胰岛素滑动秤(可能延迟出院,增加费用和护理支持的需要),经历了不必要的低血糖发作,并暴露于本可以避免的药物错误(胰岛素的类型和时间错误是特别受欢迎的)。所有这些问题都影响到护理质量、医院护理费用和延迟出院。这一问题的严重性不应被低估,因为15-20%的住院患者伴有糖尿病。鉴于上述观察结果,令人振奋的是,通过NHS糖尿病、英国糖尿病和其他组织,在全国范围内,人们越来越认识到前瞻性糖尿病住院治疗的价值。这是由于一些研究的结果,这些研究清楚地证明了前瞻性糖尿病专家参与的好处。安德鲁·布鲁克斯及其同事的文章(第xxx页)继续支持这种方法,每位糖尿病患者(初步诊断为糖尿病)的住院时间平均减少超过5天,并通过每周两次的多专业人员全院就诊显著减少处方和管理错误。值得庆幸的是,这种治疗糖尿病住院病人的方法在NHS内部得到了更广泛的认可和价值,我们自己的部门最近因我们前瞻性的糖尿病医院服务而获得了2010年NHS健康和社会关怀奖的全国优胜者。在医院能力在冬季严重紧张的时候,糖尿病专家团队可以在糖尿病护理中发挥重要作用,提高护理质量并影响住院时间。所有医院的糖尿病团队现在都应该有机会提供这种前瞻性的护理,并有专门的时间来提供这项服务。证据是明确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing diabetes inpatient care: the momentum increases
reactive. A hospital ward recognises there is a problem with a patient’s diabetes care (who has often been admitted with a diagnosis unrelated to their diabetes) and summons specialist help. The problem with this approach is several fold. Firstly, it relies upon a ward recognising there is a problem. Many hospital health care professionals still do not recognise the relationship between good glycaemic control and improved wound healing rates, quicker resolution of sepsis and other conditions that rely upon phagocyte function. Secondly, if the specialist team are contacted for advice it is often too late, several days after admission when metabolic control could have been targeted earlier with more clinical impact. Thirdly, these patients with diabetes often have other unrecognised diabetes related comorb idities that could have benefited from diabetes specialist review. Fourthly, many of these patients may have been on intravenous insulin sliding scales unnecessarily (potentially delaying discharge from hospital, increasing costs and the need for nursing support), experienced unnecessary hypoglycaemic episodes and be exposed to drug errors that could have been avoided (incorrect type and timing of insulin being particular favourites). All of these problems impact upon quality of care, costs of hospital care and delay hospital discharges. The magnitude of this problem should not be underestimated since 15–20% of inpatients have concomitant diabetes. Given the above observations, it is heartening to see that there is growing recognition of the value of prospective diabetes inpatient care at a national level through NHS Diabetes, Diabetes UK and other organisations. This has arisen with the results of a number of studies which have clearly demonstrated the benefits of prospective diabetes specialist involvement. The article by Andrew Brooks and colleagues (page xxx) continues to support this approach with an average reduction in length of stay exceeding five days per patient with diabetes (with a primary diagnosis of diabetes) and significant reduction in prescription and management errors through multi-professional twice-weekly whole hospital visits. Thankfully, wider recognition and value of this approach towards inpatient diabetes care are emerging within the NHS and our own department were recently awarded the National Winners, NHS Health and Social Care Awards 2010, for our prospective diabetes hospital service. At a time when hospital capacity is severely stretched over winter months, diabetes specialist teams can have an important role to play in diabetes care, improving care quality and also impacting upon duration of hospital stay. All hospital diabetes teams should now be given the opportunity to provide this prospective care with dedicated time to deliver this service. The evidence is unequivocal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信