民族聚居与“新空间秩序”?: 1980-2000年美国四个大都市区的探索性分析

R. Johnston, M. Poulsen, J. Forrest
{"title":"民族聚居与“新空间秩序”?: 1980-2000年美国四个大都市区的探索性分析","authors":"R. Johnston, M. Poulsen, J. Forrest","doi":"10.1002/IJPG.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The residential segregation of four main ethnic groups over the period 1980–2000 is examined for four US metropolitan areas, within the context of an assumed difference between so-called ‘modern’ and ‘post-modern’ cities. Using a newly developed measure of residential concentration, that binary distinction is found wanting: Los Angeles clearly differs from New York and Chicago, especially in the desegregation of African-Americans over the two decades, but Miami is as close to those two ‘modern’ cities in its segregation patterns as it is to Los Angeles. Overall, the findings suggest little major change during the two decades: continued high levels of segregation of whites and African-Americans (except in Los Angeles), alongside increased segregation of Hispanics, and slightly increased segregation of Asians. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":73472,"journal":{"name":"International journal of population geography : IJPG","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/IJPG.272","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnic residential concentration and a ‘new spatial order?’: exploratory analyses of four United States metropolitan areas, 1980–2000\",\"authors\":\"R. Johnston, M. Poulsen, J. Forrest\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/IJPG.272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The residential segregation of four main ethnic groups over the period 1980–2000 is examined for four US metropolitan areas, within the context of an assumed difference between so-called ‘modern’ and ‘post-modern’ cities. Using a newly developed measure of residential concentration, that binary distinction is found wanting: Los Angeles clearly differs from New York and Chicago, especially in the desegregation of African-Americans over the two decades, but Miami is as close to those two ‘modern’ cities in its segregation patterns as it is to Los Angeles. Overall, the findings suggest little major change during the two decades: continued high levels of segregation of whites and African-Americans (except in Los Angeles), alongside increased segregation of Hispanics, and slightly increased segregation of Asians. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of population geography : IJPG\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/IJPG.272\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of population geography : IJPG\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/IJPG.272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of population geography : IJPG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/IJPG.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

在所谓的“现代”和“后现代”城市之间的假设差异的背景下,研究了1980年至2000年期间四个主要种族群体的居住隔离。使用一种新开发的住宅集中度测量方法,发现这种二元区分是不存在的:洛杉矶与纽约和芝加哥明显不同,特别是在过去二十年来非洲裔美国人的种族隔离方面,但迈阿密在种族隔离模式上与这两个“现代”城市一样接近洛杉矶。总的来说,研究结果表明,在这二十年里,几乎没有什么重大变化:白人和非洲裔美国人的高度隔离(洛杉矶除外)仍在继续,西班牙裔美国人的隔离加剧,亚洲人的隔离略有加剧。版权所有©2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnic residential concentration and a ‘new spatial order?’: exploratory analyses of four United States metropolitan areas, 1980–2000
The residential segregation of four main ethnic groups over the period 1980–2000 is examined for four US metropolitan areas, within the context of an assumed difference between so-called ‘modern’ and ‘post-modern’ cities. Using a newly developed measure of residential concentration, that binary distinction is found wanting: Los Angeles clearly differs from New York and Chicago, especially in the desegregation of African-Americans over the two decades, but Miami is as close to those two ‘modern’ cities in its segregation patterns as it is to Los Angeles. Overall, the findings suggest little major change during the two decades: continued high levels of segregation of whites and African-Americans (except in Los Angeles), alongside increased segregation of Hispanics, and slightly increased segregation of Asians. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信