程序改进的房子列表段测试

Ping Wang , Joanna R. Baker
{"title":"程序改进的房子列表段测试","authors":"Ping Wang ,&nbsp;Joanna R. Baker","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7138(199621)10:2<24::AID-DIR4>3.0.CO;2-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An important aspect of direct marketing research focuses on developing and segmenting a house list (customer database) using various geographic, socioeconomic, and recency, frequency and monetary (RFM) measures. For a typical promotion, direct marketers may take a simple random sample from the house list as a test mailing to forecast the segment rollout response rates. Decisions about the final rollout are made in such a way that only the segments with response rates over the prespecified threshold or break-even response rate will be used. In this article, it is shown that the commonly used simple random sampling procedure may seriously underestimate the variability of the rollout response rates of segments with higher test response rates, overforecast the potential number of buyers from the rollout, and inflate forecast accuracy. Several procedures are proposed to improve the house list tests, and examples are used to compare the new procedures with the existing one. Results show that the proposed house list test procedures provide more statistically efficient, cost-effective, and reliable forecasts for segment response rates while improving the accuracy of forecasts generated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Direct Marketing","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 24-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7138(199621)10:2<24::AID-DIR4>3.0.CO;2-0","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedures to improve the house list segment tests\",\"authors\":\"Ping Wang ,&nbsp;Joanna R. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1522-7138(199621)10:2<24::AID-DIR4>3.0.CO;2-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An important aspect of direct marketing research focuses on developing and segmenting a house list (customer database) using various geographic, socioeconomic, and recency, frequency and monetary (RFM) measures. For a typical promotion, direct marketers may take a simple random sample from the house list as a test mailing to forecast the segment rollout response rates. Decisions about the final rollout are made in such a way that only the segments with response rates over the prespecified threshold or break-even response rate will be used. In this article, it is shown that the commonly used simple random sampling procedure may seriously underestimate the variability of the rollout response rates of segments with higher test response rates, overforecast the potential number of buyers from the rollout, and inflate forecast accuracy. Several procedures are proposed to improve the house list tests, and examples are used to compare the new procedures with the existing one. Results show that the proposed house list test procedures provide more statistically efficient, cost-effective, and reliable forecasts for segment response rates while improving the accuracy of forecasts generated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Direct Marketing\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 24-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7138(199621)10:2<24::AID-DIR4>3.0.CO;2-0\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Direct Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892059196702860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Direct Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892059196702860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

直接营销研究的一个重要方面是利用各种地理、社会经济和最近、频率和货币(RFM)指标来开发和细分客户名单(客户数据库)。对于一个典型的促销活动,直接营销人员可能会从房屋列表中随机抽取一个简单的样本作为测试邮件,以预测细分市场推出的反应率。有关最终推出的决策是以这样一种方式做出的,即只使用响应率超过预先指定的阈值或盈亏平衡响应率的部分。本文表明,常用的简单随机抽样程序可能严重低估了具有较高测试响应率的部分的推出响应率的可变性,高估了推出的潜在买家数量,并夸大了预测的准确性。提出了改进屋表测试的几种方法,并通过实例对新方法与现有方法进行了比较。结果表明,所提出的房屋清单测试程序在提高预测准确性的同时,提供了统计上更有效、更具成本效益和更可靠的分段响应率预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Procedures to improve the house list segment tests

An important aspect of direct marketing research focuses on developing and segmenting a house list (customer database) using various geographic, socioeconomic, and recency, frequency and monetary (RFM) measures. For a typical promotion, direct marketers may take a simple random sample from the house list as a test mailing to forecast the segment rollout response rates. Decisions about the final rollout are made in such a way that only the segments with response rates over the prespecified threshold or break-even response rate will be used. In this article, it is shown that the commonly used simple random sampling procedure may seriously underestimate the variability of the rollout response rates of segments with higher test response rates, overforecast the potential number of buyers from the rollout, and inflate forecast accuracy. Several procedures are proposed to improve the house list tests, and examples are used to compare the new procedures with the existing one. Results show that the proposed house list test procedures provide more statistically efficient, cost-effective, and reliable forecasts for segment response rates while improving the accuracy of forecasts generated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信