不适用性原则:混沌对社会科学意味着什么

R. David Smith
{"title":"不适用性原则:混沌对社会科学意味着什么","authors":"R. David Smith","doi":"10.1002/bs.3830400105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some basic terms in chaos theory are reviewed and some of their broad possible implications for Galilean science are briefly discussed. The main conclusion is that there are regions of scientific research within which the Galilean Principles of Model Building, the extensive use of prediction for refining and testing, do not apply. Some consequences are explored, notably that while social science may be possible, social engineering is a much more dubious enterprise.</p>","PeriodicalId":75578,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral science","volume":"40 1","pages":"22-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bs.3830400105","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The inapplicability principle: What chaos means for social science\",\"authors\":\"R. David Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bs.3830400105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Some basic terms in chaos theory are reviewed and some of their broad possible implications for Galilean science are briefly discussed. The main conclusion is that there are regions of scientific research within which the Galilean Principles of Model Building, the extensive use of prediction for refining and testing, do not apply. Some consequences are explored, notably that while social science may be possible, social engineering is a much more dubious enterprise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"22-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bs.3830400105\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bs.3830400105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bs.3830400105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

回顾了混沌理论中的一些基本术语,并简要讨论了它们对伽利略科学可能产生的广泛影响。主要结论是,在科学研究的某些领域,伽利略模型构建原理,即广泛使用预测来改进和测试,并不适用。书中探讨了一些后果,值得注意的是,虽然社会科学可能是可能的,但社会工程是一项更加可疑的事业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The inapplicability principle: What chaos means for social science

Some basic terms in chaos theory are reviewed and some of their broad possible implications for Galilean science are briefly discussed. The main conclusion is that there are regions of scientific research within which the Galilean Principles of Model Building, the extensive use of prediction for refining and testing, do not apply. Some consequences are explored, notably that while social science may be possible, social engineering is a much more dubious enterprise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信