{"title":"调查小学教师对科学本质教学的看法、实施与纵向制定","authors":"Hallie Edgerly, Jerrid Kruse, Jesse Wilcox","doi":"10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>During a 10-week professional physical science professional development (PD) course, elementary inservice teachers (<i>n</i> = 18) in a large urban district were engaged in explicit-reflective nature of science (NOS) instruction. Teachers were also explicitly engaged in reflection concerning NOS pedagogy (e.g., explicit-reflective, role of context). During the last 2 weeks of the PD course, teachers attempted to implement NOS instruction in their classrooms. Teachers submitted videos of their NOS teaching and written reflections about their videos. Then, 7 months later, teacher participants (<i>n</i> = 14) submitted videos of their science teaching. During the PD course, most teachers were able to implement effective explicit-reflective NOS instruction and their reflections indicated strong agreement between participants’ NOS pedagogical content knowledge and their enacted NOS instruction. 7 months later, just over one-third of participants continued to include explicit-reflective NOS instruction in their science teaching. NOS views, prior NOS pedagogical views, and prior NOS enactment did not account for longitudinal inclusion of effective NOS instruction. The role of teachers’ rationale for NOS and informal support networks are discussed.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":56374,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"32 4","pages":"1049 - 1073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Elementary Teachers’ Views, Implementation, and Longitudinal Enactment of Nature of Science Instruction\",\"authors\":\"Hallie Edgerly, Jerrid Kruse, Jesse Wilcox\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h2>Abstract\\n</h2><div><p>During a 10-week professional physical science professional development (PD) course, elementary inservice teachers (<i>n</i> = 18) in a large urban district were engaged in explicit-reflective nature of science (NOS) instruction. Teachers were also explicitly engaged in reflection concerning NOS pedagogy (e.g., explicit-reflective, role of context). During the last 2 weeks of the PD course, teachers attempted to implement NOS instruction in their classrooms. Teachers submitted videos of their NOS teaching and written reflections about their videos. Then, 7 months later, teacher participants (<i>n</i> = 14) submitted videos of their science teaching. During the PD course, most teachers were able to implement effective explicit-reflective NOS instruction and their reflections indicated strong agreement between participants’ NOS pedagogical content knowledge and their enacted NOS instruction. 7 months later, just over one-third of participants continued to include explicit-reflective NOS instruction in their science teaching. NOS views, prior NOS pedagogical views, and prior NOS enactment did not account for longitudinal inclusion of effective NOS instruction. The role of teachers’ rationale for NOS and informal support networks are discussed.</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"1049 - 1073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-022-00343-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating Elementary Teachers’ Views, Implementation, and Longitudinal Enactment of Nature of Science Instruction
Abstract
During a 10-week professional physical science professional development (PD) course, elementary inservice teachers (n = 18) in a large urban district were engaged in explicit-reflective nature of science (NOS) instruction. Teachers were also explicitly engaged in reflection concerning NOS pedagogy (e.g., explicit-reflective, role of context). During the last 2 weeks of the PD course, teachers attempted to implement NOS instruction in their classrooms. Teachers submitted videos of their NOS teaching and written reflections about their videos. Then, 7 months later, teacher participants (n = 14) submitted videos of their science teaching. During the PD course, most teachers were able to implement effective explicit-reflective NOS instruction and their reflections indicated strong agreement between participants’ NOS pedagogical content knowledge and their enacted NOS instruction. 7 months later, just over one-third of participants continued to include explicit-reflective NOS instruction in their science teaching. NOS views, prior NOS pedagogical views, and prior NOS enactment did not account for longitudinal inclusion of effective NOS instruction. The role of teachers’ rationale for NOS and informal support networks are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Science & Education publishes research informed by the history, philosophy and sociology of science and mathematics that seeks to promote better teaching, learning, and curricula in science and mathematics. More particularly Science & Education promotes: The utilization of historical, philosophical and sociological scholarship to clarify and deal with the many intellectual issues facing contemporary science and mathematics education. Collaboration between the communities of scientists, mathematicians, historians, philosophers, cognitive psychologists, sociologists, science and mathematics educators, and school and college teachers. An understanding of the philosophical, cultural, economic, religious, psychological and ethical dimensions of modern science and the interplay of these factors in the history of science. The inclusion of appropriate history and philosophy of science and mathematics courses in science and mathematics teacher-education programmes. The dissemination of accounts of lessons, units of work, and programmes in science and mathematics, at all levels, that have successfully utilized history and philosophy. Discussion of the philosophy and purposes of science and mathematics education, and their place in, and contribution to, the intellectual and ethical development of individuals and cultures.