固相微萃取和气相色谱(SPME-GC)联用作为定量生物分析工具的评价

Mohamed Abdel-Rehim, Margareta Bielenstein, Torbjörn Arvidsson
{"title":"固相微萃取和气相色谱(SPME-GC)联用作为定量生物分析工具的评价","authors":"Mohamed Abdel-Rehim,&nbsp;Margareta Bielenstein,&nbsp;Torbjörn Arvidsson","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(2000)12:5<308::AID-MCS5>3.0.CO;2-F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Solid-phase microextraction in combination with capillary gas chromatography and a nitrogen–phosphorus detector as a bioanalysis tool was investigated. Lidocaine and three of its metabolites were used as model compounds, and human plasma and urine samples were used in this evaluation. Carbowax–divinylbenzene, polyacrylate, and polydimethylsiloxane fibers were tested. Absorption times were studied for all analytes separately. Carbowax–divinylbenzene fiber gave highest recovery in plasma samples compared to other fibers. Effects of temperature, addition of salt and agitation of the sample were studied. Recovery from plasma was improved by 2–4 times at pH 9 compared to pH 3. This is due to analytes not charged at high pH. Recovery from water was 2–4 times higher than from plasma using Carbowax–divinylbenzene coated fiber. This is due to protein binding of analytes in plasma. Chromatographic selectivity was high and all metabolites were well separated. Calibration curves were linear for all metabolites in human plasma and urine in the range 0.035–7.7 μM for lidocaine and 2,6-xylidine while 0.1–3.5 μM for glycinexylidide (GX) and monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX). Precision, measures as relative standard deviation, was less than 15% and accuracy was in the range 80–115%. Limits of quantitation using plasma were 0.035 μM (8 ng/mL), 0.035 μM (4 ng/mL), 0.100 μM (18 ng/mL), and 0.100 μM (21 ng/mL) for lidocaine, 2,6-xylidine, GX, and MEGX, respectively. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Micro Sep 12: 308–315, 2000</p>","PeriodicalId":83120,"journal":{"name":"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS","volume":"12 5","pages":"308-315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(2000)12:5<308::AID-MCS5>3.0.CO;2-F","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of solid-phase microextraction in combination with gas chromatography (SPME-GC) as a tool for quantitative bioanalysis\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdel-Rehim,&nbsp;Margareta Bielenstein,&nbsp;Torbjörn Arvidsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(2000)12:5<308::AID-MCS5>3.0.CO;2-F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Solid-phase microextraction in combination with capillary gas chromatography and a nitrogen–phosphorus detector as a bioanalysis tool was investigated. Lidocaine and three of its metabolites were used as model compounds, and human plasma and urine samples were used in this evaluation. Carbowax–divinylbenzene, polyacrylate, and polydimethylsiloxane fibers were tested. Absorption times were studied for all analytes separately. Carbowax–divinylbenzene fiber gave highest recovery in plasma samples compared to other fibers. Effects of temperature, addition of salt and agitation of the sample were studied. Recovery from plasma was improved by 2–4 times at pH 9 compared to pH 3. This is due to analytes not charged at high pH. Recovery from water was 2–4 times higher than from plasma using Carbowax–divinylbenzene coated fiber. This is due to protein binding of analytes in plasma. Chromatographic selectivity was high and all metabolites were well separated. Calibration curves were linear for all metabolites in human plasma and urine in the range 0.035–7.7 μM for lidocaine and 2,6-xylidine while 0.1–3.5 μM for glycinexylidide (GX) and monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX). Precision, measures as relative standard deviation, was less than 15% and accuracy was in the range 80–115%. Limits of quantitation using plasma were 0.035 μM (8 ng/mL), 0.035 μM (4 ng/mL), 0.100 μM (18 ng/mL), and 0.100 μM (21 ng/mL) for lidocaine, 2,6-xylidine, GX, and MEGX, respectively. © 2000 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc. J Micro Sep 12: 308–315, 2000</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"308-315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1520-667X(2000)12:5<308::AID-MCS5>3.0.CO;2-F\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-667X%282000%2912%3A5%3C308%3A%3AAID-MCS5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of microcolumn separations : JMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-667X%282000%2912%3A5%3C308%3A%3AAID-MCS5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

研究了固相微萃取-毛细管气相色谱-氮磷检测器相结合的生物分析方法。利多卡因及其三种代谢物被用作模型化合物,人类血浆和尿液样本被用于本次评估。测试了碳蜡-二乙烯基苯、聚丙烯酸酯和聚二甲基硅氧烷纤维。分别研究了所有分析物的吸收时间。与其他纤维相比,碳蜡-二乙烯基苯纤维在血浆样品中的回收率最高。研究了温度、盐的加入和搅拌对样品的影响。pH为9时,血浆回收率比pH为3时提高了2-4倍。这是由于分析物在高ph下不带电。从水中回收比使用碳蜡-二乙烯基苯涂层纤维从血浆中回收高2-4倍。这是由于血浆中分析物的蛋白质结合。色谱选择性高,代谢物分离效果好。人血浆和尿液中代谢物的校准曲线在0.035 ~ 7.7 μM范围内呈线性,利多卡因和2,6-二甲醚的校准曲线在0.1 ~ 3.5 μM范围内呈线性,甘氨酸乙酯(GX)和单乙基甘氨酸乙酯(MEGX)的校准曲线在0.1 ~ 3.5 μM范围内呈线性。相对标准偏差测量的精密度小于15%,准确度在80-115%范围内。利多卡因、2,6-二甲醚、GX和MEGX的血浆定量限分别为0.035 μM (8 ng/mL)、0.035 μM (4 ng/mL)、0.100 μM (18 ng/mL)和0.100 μM (21 ng/mL)。©2000 John Wiley &[J] .中国科技大学学报(自然科学版),2000
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of solid-phase microextraction in combination with gas chromatography (SPME-GC) as a tool for quantitative bioanalysis

Solid-phase microextraction in combination with capillary gas chromatography and a nitrogen–phosphorus detector as a bioanalysis tool was investigated. Lidocaine and three of its metabolites were used as model compounds, and human plasma and urine samples were used in this evaluation. Carbowax–divinylbenzene, polyacrylate, and polydimethylsiloxane fibers were tested. Absorption times were studied for all analytes separately. Carbowax–divinylbenzene fiber gave highest recovery in plasma samples compared to other fibers. Effects of temperature, addition of salt and agitation of the sample were studied. Recovery from plasma was improved by 2–4 times at pH 9 compared to pH 3. This is due to analytes not charged at high pH. Recovery from water was 2–4 times higher than from plasma using Carbowax–divinylbenzene coated fiber. This is due to protein binding of analytes in plasma. Chromatographic selectivity was high and all metabolites were well separated. Calibration curves were linear for all metabolites in human plasma and urine in the range 0.035–7.7 μM for lidocaine and 2,6-xylidine while 0.1–3.5 μM for glycinexylidide (GX) and monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX). Precision, measures as relative standard deviation, was less than 15% and accuracy was in the range 80–115%. Limits of quantitation using plasma were 0.035 μM (8 ng/mL), 0.035 μM (4 ng/mL), 0.100 μM (18 ng/mL), and 0.100 μM (21 ng/mL) for lidocaine, 2,6-xylidine, GX, and MEGX, respectively. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Micro Sep 12: 308–315, 2000

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信