印度国家科学人才选拔考试(1963-1976)

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rachel Philip
{"title":"印度国家科学人才选拔考试(1963-1976)","authors":"Rachel Philip","doi":"10.1007/s11191-021-00210-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>India’s National Science Talent Search (NSTS) examination (1963 to 1976) was imagined and implemented by some top scientists of the period. It aimed to identify “talented” secondary school students with an aptitude for science and mathematics. Selected students attended undergraduate summer schools, did research in special labs during their Master’s degree, and were supported by a scholarship until the completion of a Ph.D. Today, the extent to which NSTS changed the discourse of “talent” as well as the mode and content of large-scale testing in India is often forgotten. Among the innovations that the examination introduced and legitimized include the multiple-choice question (MCQ) format. It shaped a positivist discourse around a special category of questions called the “thought-type” in scientifically establishing the mental acuity of students. It also defined and used “extra-curricular knowledge” as a proxy for scientific interest. Another legacy of NSTS’s discourse of objectivity was a misplaced confidence in separating the performance of candidates from the social advantages/disadvantages that shaped their school experience. Additionally, the importance of expertise in designing the examination did not give space to the input of school science teachers. Eventually, the design of the scheme fell short of the expectations of policy-makers as well as the aspirations of those who were selected. In 1977, the examination was redesigned as a general National Talent Search Examination (NTSE). A critical analysis of the short history of the NSTS enables us to reflect on the construct of “science talent” and the challenges in identifying and nurturing talented students in science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56374,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"241 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11191-021-00210-5","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"India’s National Science Talent Search Examination (1963–1976)\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Philip\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11191-021-00210-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>India’s National Science Talent Search (NSTS) examination (1963 to 1976) was imagined and implemented by some top scientists of the period. It aimed to identify “talented” secondary school students with an aptitude for science and mathematics. Selected students attended undergraduate summer schools, did research in special labs during their Master’s degree, and were supported by a scholarship until the completion of a Ph.D. Today, the extent to which NSTS changed the discourse of “talent” as well as the mode and content of large-scale testing in India is often forgotten. Among the innovations that the examination introduced and legitimized include the multiple-choice question (MCQ) format. It shaped a positivist discourse around a special category of questions called the “thought-type” in scientifically establishing the mental acuity of students. It also defined and used “extra-curricular knowledge” as a proxy for scientific interest. Another legacy of NSTS’s discourse of objectivity was a misplaced confidence in separating the performance of candidates from the social advantages/disadvantages that shaped their school experience. Additionally, the importance of expertise in designing the examination did not give space to the input of school science teachers. Eventually, the design of the scheme fell short of the expectations of policy-makers as well as the aspirations of those who were selected. In 1977, the examination was redesigned as a general National Talent Search Examination (NTSE). A critical analysis of the short history of the NSTS enables us to reflect on the construct of “science talent” and the challenges in identifying and nurturing talented students in science.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11191-021-00210-5\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-021-00210-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-021-00210-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

印度的国家科学人才搜索(NSTS)考试(1963年至1976年)是由当时的一些顶尖科学家设想和实施的。它旨在识别具有科学和数学天赋的“有天赋”的中学生。被选中的学生参加本科暑期学校,在硕士学位期间在特殊实验室做研究,并得到奖学金的支持,直到完成博士学位。今天,NSTS在多大程度上改变了“人才”的话语,以及印度大规模测试的模式和内容,这往往被遗忘。考试引入并合法化的创新包括多项选择题(MCQ)格式。在科学地确立学生的心理敏锐度方面,它围绕一种被称为“思维类型”的特殊问题类别形成了一种实证主义话语。它还定义并使用“课外知识”作为科学兴趣的代表。NSTS的客观性论述的另一个遗产是将候选人的表现与塑造他们学校经历的社会优势/劣势分开的错误信心。此外,专业知识在设计考试中的重要性没有给学校科学教师的投入空间。最终,该计划的设计没有达到政策制定者的期望,也没有达到被选中者的愿望。1977年,该考试被重新设计为全国人才搜索考试(NTSE)。对国家科学技术中心的短暂历史进行批判性分析,使我们能够反思“科学人才”的构建以及识别和培养科学人才的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
India’s National Science Talent Search Examination (1963–1976)

India’s National Science Talent Search (NSTS) examination (1963 to 1976) was imagined and implemented by some top scientists of the period. It aimed to identify “talented” secondary school students with an aptitude for science and mathematics. Selected students attended undergraduate summer schools, did research in special labs during their Master’s degree, and were supported by a scholarship until the completion of a Ph.D. Today, the extent to which NSTS changed the discourse of “talent” as well as the mode and content of large-scale testing in India is often forgotten. Among the innovations that the examination introduced and legitimized include the multiple-choice question (MCQ) format. It shaped a positivist discourse around a special category of questions called the “thought-type” in scientifically establishing the mental acuity of students. It also defined and used “extra-curricular knowledge” as a proxy for scientific interest. Another legacy of NSTS’s discourse of objectivity was a misplaced confidence in separating the performance of candidates from the social advantages/disadvantages that shaped their school experience. Additionally, the importance of expertise in designing the examination did not give space to the input of school science teachers. Eventually, the design of the scheme fell short of the expectations of policy-makers as well as the aspirations of those who were selected. In 1977, the examination was redesigned as a general National Talent Search Examination (NTSE). A critical analysis of the short history of the NSTS enables us to reflect on the construct of “science talent” and the challenges in identifying and nurturing talented students in science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science & Education publishes research informed by the history, philosophy and sociology of science and mathematics that seeks to promote better teaching, learning, and curricula in science and mathematics. More particularly Science & Education promotes: The utilization of historical, philosophical and sociological scholarship to clarify and deal with the many intellectual issues facing contemporary science and mathematics education.  Collaboration between the communities of scientists, mathematicians, historians, philosophers, cognitive psychologists, sociologists, science and mathematics educators, and school and college teachers. An understanding of the philosophical, cultural, economic, religious, psychological and ethical dimensions of modern science and the interplay of these factors in the history of science.  The inclusion of appropriate history and philosophy of science and mathematics courses in science and mathematics teacher-education programmes.  The dissemination of accounts of lessons, units of work, and programmes in science and mathematics, at all levels, that have successfully utilized history and philosophy.  Discussion of the philosophy and purposes of science and mathematics education, and their place in, and contribution to, the intellectual and ethical development of individuals and cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信