在线学习、混合学习、翻转课堂和在职教师课堂教学的荟萃分析

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Richard F. Schmid, Eugene Borokhovski, Robert M. Bernard, David I. Pickup, Phillip C. Abrami
{"title":"在线学习、混合学习、翻转课堂和在职教师课堂教学的荟萃分析","authors":"Richard F. Schmid,&nbsp;Eugene Borokhovski,&nbsp;Robert M. Bernard,&nbsp;David I. Pickup,&nbsp;Phillip C. Abrami","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This is a study of two populations of learners/teachers: Pre-service teacher students (i.e., formal education for teaching certification) and In-service teachers (i.e., engaged in professional development), and involves an examination of their use of internet-based instructional applications. In these studies, the technologies are: a) Online Learning [OL]; b) Blended Learning [BL] and c) Flipped Classrooms [FC]. Treatments were compared to standard face-to-face classroom instruction (CI) on three dependent measures analysed separately to produce 77 achievement measures in the first meta-analysis, 21 attitude/satisfaction measures in the second, and 22 studies of self-efficacy in the third. Achievement data yielded a statistically significant, moderate effect size (i.e., <em>g<sup>+</sup></em>= 0.44) in favor of the combined OL, BL and FC approaches versus CI, although OL showed only a small positive effect versus CI. Attitude yielded a non-significant effect size comparing CI with technology-supported strategies (<em>g<sup>+</sup></em>= 0.12). Interestingly, self-efficacy produced a significant and moderate average random effect size of <em>g<sup>+</sup></em> = 0.45. Perhaps the most impactful finding of this analysis is related to improved performance of BL/FC when contrasted with OL, yielding significantly positive differences in all three measures. This confirms that improved outcomes are the result of better pedagogy, not the mere presence of technology. Finally, self-efficacy was found to be meaningfully improved when using BL/FC. This is the first meta-analysis with this target population implicating self-efficacy. These two outcomes offer important implications for institutions regarding the future design of instructional delivery for both pre- and in-service teachers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of online learning, blended learning, the flipped classroom and classroom instruction for pre-service and in-service teachers\",\"authors\":\"Richard F. Schmid,&nbsp;Eugene Borokhovski,&nbsp;Robert M. Bernard,&nbsp;David I. Pickup,&nbsp;Phillip C. Abrami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This is a study of two populations of learners/teachers: Pre-service teacher students (i.e., formal education for teaching certification) and In-service teachers (i.e., engaged in professional development), and involves an examination of their use of internet-based instructional applications. In these studies, the technologies are: a) Online Learning [OL]; b) Blended Learning [BL] and c) Flipped Classrooms [FC]. Treatments were compared to standard face-to-face classroom instruction (CI) on three dependent measures analysed separately to produce 77 achievement measures in the first meta-analysis, 21 attitude/satisfaction measures in the second, and 22 studies of self-efficacy in the third. Achievement data yielded a statistically significant, moderate effect size (i.e., <em>g<sup>+</sup></em>= 0.44) in favor of the combined OL, BL and FC approaches versus CI, although OL showed only a small positive effect versus CI. Attitude yielded a non-significant effect size comparing CI with technology-supported strategies (<em>g<sup>+</sup></em>= 0.12). Interestingly, self-efficacy produced a significant and moderate average random effect size of <em>g<sup>+</sup></em> = 0.45. Perhaps the most impactful finding of this analysis is related to improved performance of BL/FC when contrasted with OL, yielding significantly positive differences in all three measures. This confirms that improved outcomes are the result of better pedagogy, not the mere presence of technology. Finally, self-efficacy was found to be meaningfully improved when using BL/FC. This is the first meta-analysis with this target population implicating self-efficacy. These two outcomes offer important implications for institutions regarding the future design of instructional delivery for both pre- and in-service teachers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557323000204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557323000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这是一项针对两类学习者/教师的研究:职前教师学生(即获得教学认证的正规教育)和在职教师(即从事专业发展),涉及对他们使用基于互联网的教学应用程序的检查。在这些研究中,技术是:a)在线学习[OL];b) 混合学习[BL]和c)翻转教室[FC]。在第一次荟萃分析中,将治疗与标准面对面课堂教学(CI)的三项依赖性指标进行了比较,分别分析了77项成就指标,第二次荟萃分析产生了21项态度/满意度指标,第三次分析产生了22项自我效能研究。成就数据产生了具有统计学意义的中等影响大小(即g+=0.44),有利于OL、BL和FC联合方法与CI的比较,尽管OL仅显示出与CI的小的积极影响。与技术支持策略相比,态度产生了不显著的影响大小(g+=0.12)。有趣的是,自我效能感产生显著和中等的平均随机效应大小g+=0.45。与OL相比,该分析中最具影响力的发现可能与BL/FC的性能改善有关,在所有三个指标上都产生了显著的正差异。这证实了结果的改善是更好的教学法的结果,而不仅仅是技术的存在。最后,当使用BL/FC时,自我效能感被发现有意义地提高。这是第一个将自我效能感纳入目标人群的荟萃分析。这两个结果为各机构在未来为职前和在职教师设计教学提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A meta-analysis of online learning, blended learning, the flipped classroom and classroom instruction for pre-service and in-service teachers

This is a study of two populations of learners/teachers: Pre-service teacher students (i.e., formal education for teaching certification) and In-service teachers (i.e., engaged in professional development), and involves an examination of their use of internet-based instructional applications. In these studies, the technologies are: a) Online Learning [OL]; b) Blended Learning [BL] and c) Flipped Classrooms [FC]. Treatments were compared to standard face-to-face classroom instruction (CI) on three dependent measures analysed separately to produce 77 achievement measures in the first meta-analysis, 21 attitude/satisfaction measures in the second, and 22 studies of self-efficacy in the third. Achievement data yielded a statistically significant, moderate effect size (i.e., g+= 0.44) in favor of the combined OL, BL and FC approaches versus CI, although OL showed only a small positive effect versus CI. Attitude yielded a non-significant effect size comparing CI with technology-supported strategies (g+= 0.12). Interestingly, self-efficacy produced a significant and moderate average random effect size of g+ = 0.45. Perhaps the most impactful finding of this analysis is related to improved performance of BL/FC when contrasted with OL, yielding significantly positive differences in all three measures. This confirms that improved outcomes are the result of better pedagogy, not the mere presence of technology. Finally, self-efficacy was found to be meaningfully improved when using BL/FC. This is the first meta-analysis with this target population implicating self-efficacy. These two outcomes offer important implications for institutions regarding the future design of instructional delivery for both pre- and in-service teachers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信