比较近似和概率微分隐私参数

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Vincent Guingona , Alexei Kolesnikov , Julianne Nierwinski , Avery Schweitzer
{"title":"比较近似和概率微分隐私参数","authors":"Vincent Guingona ,&nbsp;Alexei Kolesnikov ,&nbsp;Julianne Nierwinski ,&nbsp;Avery Schweitzer","doi":"10.1016/j.ipl.2023.106380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This paper compares two notions of differential privacy: approximate differential privacy (ADP) and probabilistic differential privacy (PrDP). It is well-known that the PrDP implies the ADP; and it was established in </span><span>[7]</span> that the ADP implies the PrDP, after a penalty on the parameters <em>ε</em> and <em>δ</em> that are used in the definitions of both properties. We show that the condition found in <span>[7]</span><span> is tight: if it fails, we construct a randomized algorithm that has ADP but not PrDP.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56290,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing Letters","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 106380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing approximate and probabilistic differential privacy parameters\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Guingona ,&nbsp;Alexei Kolesnikov ,&nbsp;Julianne Nierwinski ,&nbsp;Avery Schweitzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipl.2023.106380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>This paper compares two notions of differential privacy: approximate differential privacy (ADP) and probabilistic differential privacy (PrDP). It is well-known that the PrDP implies the ADP; and it was established in </span><span>[7]</span> that the ADP implies the PrDP, after a penalty on the parameters <em>ε</em> and <em>δ</em> that are used in the definitions of both properties. We show that the condition found in <span>[7]</span><span> is tight: if it fails, we construct a randomized algorithm that has ADP but not PrDP.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Processing Letters\",\"volume\":\"182 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Processing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020019023000236\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020019023000236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文比较了差分隐私的两个概念:近似差分隐私和概率差分隐私。众所周知,PrDP意味着ADP;并且在[7]中确定,在对两种性质的定义中使用的参数ε和δ进行惩罚之后,ADP意味着PrDP。我们证明了[7]中发现的条件是严格的:如果失败,我们构建一个具有ADP但没有PrDP的随机算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing approximate and probabilistic differential privacy parameters

This paper compares two notions of differential privacy: approximate differential privacy (ADP) and probabilistic differential privacy (PrDP). It is well-known that the PrDP implies the ADP; and it was established in [7] that the ADP implies the PrDP, after a penalty on the parameters ε and δ that are used in the definitions of both properties. We show that the condition found in [7] is tight: if it fails, we construct a randomized algorithm that has ADP but not PrDP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing Letters
Information Processing Letters 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Information Processing Letters invites submission of original research articles that focus on fundamental aspects of information processing and computing. This naturally includes work in the broadly understood field of theoretical computer science; although papers in all areas of scientific inquiry will be given consideration, provided that they describe research contributions credibly motivated by applications to computing and involve rigorous methodology. High quality experimental papers that address topics of sufficiently broad interest may also be considered. Since its inception in 1971, Information Processing Letters has served as a forum for timely dissemination of short, concise and focused research contributions. Continuing with this tradition, and to expedite the reviewing process, manuscripts are generally limited in length to nine pages when they appear in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信