Jom Kuriakose, Veena Suresh, Shrey Dutta, Hema A. Murthy, M. V. N. Murthy
{"title":"论卡纳蒂克音乐中拉格血统的概念","authors":"Jom Kuriakose, Veena Suresh, Shrey Dutta, Hema A. Murthy, M. V. N. Murthy","doi":"10.1080/09298215.2023.2251457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of <i>rāga</i> in Carnatic music is based on an ordered set of notes in an octave. Historically <i>rāgas</i> are broadly classified into two sets, namely <i>Janaka</i> (root/parent) and <i>Janya</i> (derived/offspring) <i>rāgas</i>. Every <i>janya rāga</i> is derived from a unique parent. We examine this classification critically and attempt to provide a quantitative basis for such a classification by defining a ‘distance’ between <i>rāgas</i>. The shortest identifies the parentage. Each <i>rāga</i> is defined by a pitch histogram vector in a 12-dimensional space. To achieve consensus, different distance metrics are used in the multi-dimensional space. Using a standard data set (refer to section 4.4), we carry out the distance analysis using entire compositions, which we subsequently fine-tune using only the parts of compositions that contain all the features of the <i>rāga</i>. We also perform an independent analysis for comparing the motif sequences in <i>rāgas</i>. We find that while the conventional method (refer to section 3) is fairly robust, there are exceptions, especially with pentatonic <i>rāgas</i>, and that these exceptions are actively debated in the public domain. Since quantitative methods find it difficult to achieve consensus, we conclude that while a <i>rāga</i> belongs to a family, it does not necessarily belong to a unique parent.</p>","PeriodicalId":16553,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Music Research","volume":"78 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the concept of Raga parentage in Carnatic music\",\"authors\":\"Jom Kuriakose, Veena Suresh, Shrey Dutta, Hema A. Murthy, M. V. N. Murthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09298215.2023.2251457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The concept of <i>rāga</i> in Carnatic music is based on an ordered set of notes in an octave. Historically <i>rāgas</i> are broadly classified into two sets, namely <i>Janaka</i> (root/parent) and <i>Janya</i> (derived/offspring) <i>rāgas</i>. Every <i>janya rāga</i> is derived from a unique parent. We examine this classification critically and attempt to provide a quantitative basis for such a classification by defining a ‘distance’ between <i>rāgas</i>. The shortest identifies the parentage. Each <i>rāga</i> is defined by a pitch histogram vector in a 12-dimensional space. To achieve consensus, different distance metrics are used in the multi-dimensional space. Using a standard data set (refer to section 4.4), we carry out the distance analysis using entire compositions, which we subsequently fine-tune using only the parts of compositions that contain all the features of the <i>rāga</i>. We also perform an independent analysis for comparing the motif sequences in <i>rāgas</i>. We find that while the conventional method (refer to section 3) is fairly robust, there are exceptions, especially with pentatonic <i>rāgas</i>, and that these exceptions are actively debated in the public domain. Since quantitative methods find it difficult to achieve consensus, we conclude that while a <i>rāga</i> belongs to a family, it does not necessarily belong to a unique parent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of New Music Research\",\"volume\":\"78 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of New Music Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2023.2251457\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Music Research","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2023.2251457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the concept of Raga parentage in Carnatic music
The concept of rāga in Carnatic music is based on an ordered set of notes in an octave. Historically rāgas are broadly classified into two sets, namely Janaka (root/parent) and Janya (derived/offspring) rāgas. Every janya rāga is derived from a unique parent. We examine this classification critically and attempt to provide a quantitative basis for such a classification by defining a ‘distance’ between rāgas. The shortest identifies the parentage. Each rāga is defined by a pitch histogram vector in a 12-dimensional space. To achieve consensus, different distance metrics are used in the multi-dimensional space. Using a standard data set (refer to section 4.4), we carry out the distance analysis using entire compositions, which we subsequently fine-tune using only the parts of compositions that contain all the features of the rāga. We also perform an independent analysis for comparing the motif sequences in rāgas. We find that while the conventional method (refer to section 3) is fairly robust, there are exceptions, especially with pentatonic rāgas, and that these exceptions are actively debated in the public domain. Since quantitative methods find it difficult to achieve consensus, we conclude that while a rāga belongs to a family, it does not necessarily belong to a unique parent.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of New Music Research (JNMR) publishes material which increases our understanding of music and musical processes by systematic, scientific and technological means. Research published in the journal is innovative, empirically grounded and often, but not exclusively, uses quantitative methods. Articles are both musically relevant and scientifically rigorous, giving full technical details. No bounds are placed on the music or musical behaviours at issue: popular music, music of diverse cultures and the canon of western classical music are all within the Journal’s scope. Articles deal with theory, analysis, composition, performance, uses of music, instruments and other music technologies. The Journal was founded in 1972 with the original title Interface to reflect its interdisciplinary nature, drawing on musicology (including music theory), computer science, psychology, acoustics, philosophy, and other disciplines.