Ke Cao, Josephine Yeung, Yasser Arafat, Matthew Y K Wei, Justin M C Yeung, Paul N Baird
{"title":"使用3D衍生人工智能从L3脊椎的多次CT扫描与单次中点L3 CT扫描中识别身体成分测量的差异。","authors":"Ke Cao, Josephine Yeung, Yasser Arafat, Matthew Y K Wei, Justin M C Yeung, Paul N Baird","doi":"10.1155/2023/1047314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Body composition analysis in colorectal cancer (CRC) typically utilises a single 2D-abdominal axial CT slice taken at the mid-L3 level. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) allows for analysis of the entire L3 vertebra (non-mid-L3 and mid-L3). The goal of this study was to determine if the use of an AI approach offered any additional information on capturing body composition measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2203 axial CT slices of the entire L3 level (4-46 slices were available per patient) were retrospectively collected from 203 CRC patients treated at Western Health, Melbourne (97 males; 47.8%). A pretrained artificial intelligence (AI) model was used to segment muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on these slices. The difference in body composition measures between mid-L3 and non-mid-L3 scans was compared for each patient, and for males and females separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body composition measures derived from non-mid-L3 scans exhibited a median range of 0.85% to 6.28% (average percent difference) when compared to the use of a single mid-L3 scan. Significant variation in the VAT surface area (<i>p</i> = 0.02) was observed in females compared to males, whereas male patients exhibited a greater variation in SAT surface area (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and radiodensity (<i>p</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences in various body composition measures were observed when comparing non-mid-L3 slices to only the mid-L3 slice. Researchers should be aware that considering only the use of a single midpoint L3 CT scan slice will impact the estimate of body composition measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":"2023 ","pages":"1047314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Differences in Body Composition Measures Using 3D-Derived Artificial Intelligence from Multiple CT Scans across the L3 Vertebra Compared to a Single Mid-Point L3 CT Scan.\",\"authors\":\"Ke Cao, Josephine Yeung, Yasser Arafat, Matthew Y K Wei, Justin M C Yeung, Paul N Baird\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/1047314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Body composition analysis in colorectal cancer (CRC) typically utilises a single 2D-abdominal axial CT slice taken at the mid-L3 level. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) allows for analysis of the entire L3 vertebra (non-mid-L3 and mid-L3). The goal of this study was to determine if the use of an AI approach offered any additional information on capturing body composition measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 2203 axial CT slices of the entire L3 level (4-46 slices were available per patient) were retrospectively collected from 203 CRC patients treated at Western Health, Melbourne (97 males; 47.8%). A pretrained artificial intelligence (AI) model was used to segment muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on these slices. The difference in body composition measures between mid-L3 and non-mid-L3 scans was compared for each patient, and for males and females separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body composition measures derived from non-mid-L3 scans exhibited a median range of 0.85% to 6.28% (average percent difference) when compared to the use of a single mid-L3 scan. Significant variation in the VAT surface area (<i>p</i> = 0.02) was observed in females compared to males, whereas male patients exhibited a greater variation in SAT surface area (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and radiodensity (<i>p</i> = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences in various body composition measures were observed when comparing non-mid-L3 slices to only the mid-L3 slice. Researchers should be aware that considering only the use of a single midpoint L3 CT scan slice will impact the estimate of body composition measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"1047314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1047314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1047314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:癌症(CRC)的身体成分分析通常使用在L3中期拍摄的单个二维轴向CT切片。人工智能(AI)的使用允许对整个L3椎骨(非L3中段和L3中段)进行分析。这项研究的目的是确定人工智能方法的使用是否提供了关于捕捉身体成分测量的任何额外信息。方法:回顾性收集203名在墨尔本西部健康中心接受治疗的CRC患者(97名男性,47.8%)的2203张L3水平的轴向CT切片(每位患者可获得4-46张切片)。使用预训练的人工智能(AI)模型分割这些切片上的肌肉、内脏脂肪组织(VAT)和皮下脂肪组织(SAT)。对每位患者以及男性和女性分别进行了L3中期和非L3中期扫描之间身体成分测量的差异比较。结果:与使用单一L3中期扫描相比,非L3中期扫描得出的身体成分测量显示出0.85%至6.28%的中值范围(平均百分比差异)。增值税表面积的显著变化(p = 0.02),而男性患者的SAT表面积变化更大(p p = 0.007)。结论:当比较非L3中段切片和仅L3中段切片时,观察到各种身体成分测量的显著差异。研究人员应该意识到,只考虑使用单个中点L3 CT扫描切片会影响身体成分测量的估计。
Identification of Differences in Body Composition Measures Using 3D-Derived Artificial Intelligence from Multiple CT Scans across the L3 Vertebra Compared to a Single Mid-Point L3 CT Scan.
Purpose: Body composition analysis in colorectal cancer (CRC) typically utilises a single 2D-abdominal axial CT slice taken at the mid-L3 level. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) allows for analysis of the entire L3 vertebra (non-mid-L3 and mid-L3). The goal of this study was to determine if the use of an AI approach offered any additional information on capturing body composition measures.
Methods: A total of 2203 axial CT slices of the entire L3 level (4-46 slices were available per patient) were retrospectively collected from 203 CRC patients treated at Western Health, Melbourne (97 males; 47.8%). A pretrained artificial intelligence (AI) model was used to segment muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on these slices. The difference in body composition measures between mid-L3 and non-mid-L3 scans was compared for each patient, and for males and females separately.
Results: Body composition measures derived from non-mid-L3 scans exhibited a median range of 0.85% to 6.28% (average percent difference) when compared to the use of a single mid-L3 scan. Significant variation in the VAT surface area (p = 0.02) was observed in females compared to males, whereas male patients exhibited a greater variation in SAT surface area (p < 0.001) and radiodensity (p = 0.007).
Conclusion: Significant differences in various body composition measures were observed when comparing non-mid-L3 slices to only the mid-L3 slice. Researchers should be aware that considering only the use of a single midpoint L3 CT scan slice will impact the estimate of body composition measurements.
期刊介绍:
Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen