经导管主动脉瓣植入术麻醉入路的评价。

IF 0.6 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Murat İzgi, Adem Halis, Yusuf Ziya Şener, Levent Şahiner, Ergün Barış Kaya, Kudret Aytemir, Ayşe Heves Karagöz
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣植入术麻醉入路的评价。","authors":"Murat İzgi, Adem Halis, Yusuf Ziya Şener, Levent Şahiner, Ergün Barış Kaya, Kudret Aytemir, Ayşe Heves Karagöz","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.231270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement and has become a popular treatment modality for inoperable or patients at high surgical risk with severe aortic stenosis. We aimed to evaluate our perioperative anaesthetic experiences with patients undergoing TAVI under sedation or general anaesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty-nine patients who underwent TAVI procedures were enrolled. Effects on TAVI outcomes of sedation and GA were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of surgery and anaesthesia was significantly longer in patients who received GA. Insertion site complication and post-TAVI pacemaker implantation rates were similar between the groups, but the frequency of intraoperative complications (10% vs. 0.8%; <i>P</i>=0.015), intraoperative hypotension (35.3% vs. 70%; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (12.6% vs. 27.5%; <i>P</i>=0.028) was significantly higher in the GA group. Stroke occurred in seven patients, and all were in the sedation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GA is related to increased procedure time and acute kidney injury; therefore, local anaesthesia and sedation may be the first option in patients undergoing TAVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Anaesthetic Approaches in Transcatheter Aortic Valv Implantation Procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Murat İzgi, Adem Halis, Yusuf Ziya Şener, Levent Şahiner, Ergün Barış Kaya, Kudret Aytemir, Ayşe Heves Karagöz\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TJAR.231270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement and has become a popular treatment modality for inoperable or patients at high surgical risk with severe aortic stenosis. We aimed to evaluate our perioperative anaesthetic experiences with patients undergoing TAVI under sedation or general anaesthesia (GA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty-nine patients who underwent TAVI procedures were enrolled. Effects on TAVI outcomes of sedation and GA were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of surgery and anaesthesia was significantly longer in patients who received GA. Insertion site complication and post-TAVI pacemaker implantation rates were similar between the groups, but the frequency of intraoperative complications (10% vs. 0.8%; <i>P</i>=0.015), intraoperative hypotension (35.3% vs. 70%; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (12.6% vs. 27.5%; <i>P</i>=0.028) was significantly higher in the GA group. Stroke occurred in seven patients, and all were in the sedation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GA is related to increased procedure time and acute kidney injury; therefore, local anaesthesia and sedation may be the first option in patients undergoing TAVI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10606737/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.231270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.231270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已成为外科主动脉瓣置换术的替代方案,并已成为无法手术或手术风险高的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的流行治疗方式。我们的目的是评估我们在镇静或全身麻醉(GA)下接受TAVI的患者的围手术期麻醉经验。方法:纳入159名接受TAVI手术的患者。比较镇静和GA对TAVI结果的影响。结果:接受GA的患者的手术和麻醉持续时间明显更长。两组之间的插入部位并发症和TAVI起搏器植入后的发生率相似,但术中并发症的发生率(10%对0.8%;P=0.015)、术中低血压的发生频率(35.3%对70%;P<0.001)、,急性肾损伤(12.6%对27.5%;P=0.028)在GA组中显著升高。中风发生在7名患者中,所有患者都在镇静组。结论:GA与手术时间增加和急性肾损伤有关;因此,局部麻醉和镇静可能是接受TAVI的患者的第一选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Anaesthetic Approaches in Transcatheter Aortic Valv Implantation Procedures.

Evaluation of Anaesthetic Approaches in Transcatheter Aortic Valv Implantation Procedures.

Evaluation of Anaesthetic Approaches in Transcatheter Aortic Valv Implantation Procedures.

Evaluation of Anaesthetic Approaches in Transcatheter Aortic Valv Implantation Procedures.

Objective: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement and has become a popular treatment modality for inoperable or patients at high surgical risk with severe aortic stenosis. We aimed to evaluate our perioperative anaesthetic experiences with patients undergoing TAVI under sedation or general anaesthesia (GA).

Methods: One hundred and fifty-nine patients who underwent TAVI procedures were enrolled. Effects on TAVI outcomes of sedation and GA were compared.

Results: The duration of surgery and anaesthesia was significantly longer in patients who received GA. Insertion site complication and post-TAVI pacemaker implantation rates were similar between the groups, but the frequency of intraoperative complications (10% vs. 0.8%; P=0.015), intraoperative hypotension (35.3% vs. 70%; P < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (12.6% vs. 27.5%; P=0.028) was significantly higher in the GA group. Stroke occurred in seven patients, and all were in the sedation group.

Conclusion: GA is related to increased procedure time and acute kidney injury; therefore, local anaesthesia and sedation may be the first option in patients undergoing TAVI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信