中国的排放交易:新的政治经济动态

IF 3 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zexiang Wang, Jouni Paavola
{"title":"中国的排放交易:新的政治经济动态","authors":"Zexiang Wang,&nbsp;Jouni Paavola","doi":"10.1002/eet.2046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>China has pledged to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and to become carbon neutral by 2060. Achieving the targets would need great improvement of its emissions trading scheme (ETS) that covers half of the country's emissions. Lessons from the European Union have shown that the ETS is not only a product of the changing circumstances, but its implementation and revisions are also continuously affected by the evolving context. Using a political economy perspective, we examine whether the changing environment is also affecting China's ETS. Our analysis centres on two recent contextual dynamics with relevance to the ETS: (1) the change in the ETS authority in 2018; and (2) the impacts of the deteriorating economic environment on the climate-energy policy complex. We find that China's ETS and its broad climate ambitions are still constrained by the tensions between the long-term socio-economic benefits of low-carbon policies and the short-term economic interests behind the government's policy motives, which led to conflicting interests and priorities among regulatory agencies and local governments. The analysis contributes to the political economy debates on emissions trading and China's environmental governance. It also provides practical insights to the policymakers with an in-depth inquiry into the structural barriers to China's net-zero targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"33 5","pages":"504-516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2046","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emissions trading in China: New political economy dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Zexiang Wang,&nbsp;Jouni Paavola\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eet.2046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>China has pledged to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and to become carbon neutral by 2060. Achieving the targets would need great improvement of its emissions trading scheme (ETS) that covers half of the country's emissions. Lessons from the European Union have shown that the ETS is not only a product of the changing circumstances, but its implementation and revisions are also continuously affected by the evolving context. Using a political economy perspective, we examine whether the changing environment is also affecting China's ETS. Our analysis centres on two recent contextual dynamics with relevance to the ETS: (1) the change in the ETS authority in 2018; and (2) the impacts of the deteriorating economic environment on the climate-energy policy complex. We find that China's ETS and its broad climate ambitions are still constrained by the tensions between the long-term socio-economic benefits of low-carbon policies and the short-term economic interests behind the government's policy motives, which led to conflicting interests and priorities among regulatory agencies and local governments. The analysis contributes to the political economy debates on emissions trading and China's environmental governance. It also provides practical insights to the policymakers with an in-depth inquiry into the structural barriers to China's net-zero targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"504-516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.2046\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2046\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.2046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

中国承诺到2030年达到碳排放峰值,到2060年实现碳中和的。实现这些目标需要大幅改进其排放交易计划(ETS),该计划涵盖了该国一半的排放量。欧盟的经验教训表明,ETS不仅是环境变化的产物,其实施和修订也不断受到环境变化的影响。从政治经济学的角度,我们考察了不断变化的环境是否也在影响中国的ETS。我们的分析集中在与ETS相关的两个最近的背景动态上:(1)2018年ETS权威的变化;以及(2)不断恶化的经济环境对气候能源政策复合体的影响。我们发现,中国的ETS及其广泛的气候雄心仍然受到低碳政策的长期社会经济效益与政府政策动机背后的短期经济利益之间的紧张关系的制约,这导致监管机构和地方政府之间的利益和优先事项相冲突。该分析有助于推动关于排放交易和中国环境治理的政治经济学辩论。它还通过深入调查中国实现净零目标的结构性障碍,为决策者提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emissions trading in China: New political economy dynamics

China has pledged to peak carbon emissions by 2030 and to become carbon neutral by 2060. Achieving the targets would need great improvement of its emissions trading scheme (ETS) that covers half of the country's emissions. Lessons from the European Union have shown that the ETS is not only a product of the changing circumstances, but its implementation and revisions are also continuously affected by the evolving context. Using a political economy perspective, we examine whether the changing environment is also affecting China's ETS. Our analysis centres on two recent contextual dynamics with relevance to the ETS: (1) the change in the ETS authority in 2018; and (2) the impacts of the deteriorating economic environment on the climate-energy policy complex. We find that China's ETS and its broad climate ambitions are still constrained by the tensions between the long-term socio-economic benefits of low-carbon policies and the short-term economic interests behind the government's policy motives, which led to conflicting interests and priorities among regulatory agencies and local governments. The analysis contributes to the political economy debates on emissions trading and China's environmental governance. It also provides practical insights to the policymakers with an in-depth inquiry into the structural barriers to China's net-zero targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信