以广泛分布的地衣作为空气质量生物指标的多变量受体建模

IF 1.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmetrics Pub Date : 2022-12-25 DOI:10.1002/env.2785
Matthew Heiner, Taylor Grimm, Hayden Smith, Steven D. Leavitt, William F. Christensen, Gregory T. Carling, Larry L. St. Clair
{"title":"以广泛分布的地衣作为空气质量生物指标的多变量受体建模","authors":"Matthew Heiner,&nbsp;Taylor Grimm,&nbsp;Hayden Smith,&nbsp;Steven D. Leavitt,&nbsp;William F. Christensen,&nbsp;Gregory T. Carling,&nbsp;Larry L. St. Clair","doi":"10.1002/env.2785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biomonitoring studies evaluating air quality via airborne element accumulation patterns in lichens typically control variability by focusing on narrow geographic regions and short time windows. Using samples of the widespread “rock-posy” lichen sampled across the Intermountain Region of the United States, we investigate whether accumulation patterns of generic pollution sources are detectable on broad geographic and temporal scales. We develop a novel Bayesian multivariate receptor modeling (BMRM) approach that sharpens detection and discrimination of candidate pollution sources through (i) regularization of source contributions to each sample and (ii) incorporating estimated lichen secondary chemistry as a factor. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate a distinct advantage in shrinking contributions when they are truly sparse, as would be expected with heterogeneous samples from dispersed collection sites. We contrast analyses employing both standard and sparse BMRMs, and positive matrix factorization (PMF). The sparse model better maintains source identity, as specified though informative prior distributions on elemental profiles. We advocate quantitative profile matching, which reveals that PMF primarily captures variations of the baseline profile for lichen secondary chemistry. Both PMF and BMRM results suggest that the most detectable signatures relate to aeolian dust deposition, while spatial patterns hint at sporadic anthropogenic influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50512,"journal":{"name":"Environmetrics","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariate receptor modeling with widely dispersed Lichens as bioindicators of air quality\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Heiner,&nbsp;Taylor Grimm,&nbsp;Hayden Smith,&nbsp;Steven D. Leavitt,&nbsp;William F. Christensen,&nbsp;Gregory T. Carling,&nbsp;Larry L. St. Clair\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/env.2785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Biomonitoring studies evaluating air quality via airborne element accumulation patterns in lichens typically control variability by focusing on narrow geographic regions and short time windows. Using samples of the widespread “rock-posy” lichen sampled across the Intermountain Region of the United States, we investigate whether accumulation patterns of generic pollution sources are detectable on broad geographic and temporal scales. We develop a novel Bayesian multivariate receptor modeling (BMRM) approach that sharpens detection and discrimination of candidate pollution sources through (i) regularization of source contributions to each sample and (ii) incorporating estimated lichen secondary chemistry as a factor. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate a distinct advantage in shrinking contributions when they are truly sparse, as would be expected with heterogeneous samples from dispersed collection sites. We contrast analyses employing both standard and sparse BMRMs, and positive matrix factorization (PMF). The sparse model better maintains source identity, as specified though informative prior distributions on elemental profiles. We advocate quantitative profile matching, which reveals that PMF primarily captures variations of the baseline profile for lichen secondary chemistry. Both PMF and BMRM results suggest that the most detectable signatures relate to aeolian dust deposition, while spatial patterns hint at sporadic anthropogenic influence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmetrics\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2785\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmetrics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过地衣中空气中元素积累模式评估空气质量的生物监测研究通常通过关注狭窄的地理区域和短时间窗口来控制变异性。使用在美国山间地区采样的广泛分布的“岩石状”地衣样本,我们调查了在广泛的地理和时间尺度上是否可以检测到一般污染源的积累模式。我们开发了一种新的贝叶斯多元受体建模(BMRM)方法,该方法通过(i)对每个样本的污染源贡献进行正则化,以及(ii)将估计的地衣次生化学作为一个因素,来提高候选污染源的检测和判别能力。通过模拟研究,我们证明了在真正稀疏的情况下缩小贡献的明显优势,正如来自分散采集点的异质样本所预期的那样。我们对比了使用标准和稀疏BMRM以及正矩阵分解(PMF)的分析。稀疏模型更好地维护了源身份,正如通过元素剖面上的信息先验分布所指定的那样。我们提倡定量图谱匹配,这表明PMF主要捕捉地衣次生化学的基线图谱的变化。PMF和BMRM的结果都表明,最可检测的特征与风尘沉积有关,而空间模式暗示了零星的人为影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multivariate receptor modeling with widely dispersed Lichens as bioindicators of air quality

Biomonitoring studies evaluating air quality via airborne element accumulation patterns in lichens typically control variability by focusing on narrow geographic regions and short time windows. Using samples of the widespread “rock-posy” lichen sampled across the Intermountain Region of the United States, we investigate whether accumulation patterns of generic pollution sources are detectable on broad geographic and temporal scales. We develop a novel Bayesian multivariate receptor modeling (BMRM) approach that sharpens detection and discrimination of candidate pollution sources through (i) regularization of source contributions to each sample and (ii) incorporating estimated lichen secondary chemistry as a factor. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate a distinct advantage in shrinking contributions when they are truly sparse, as would be expected with heterogeneous samples from dispersed collection sites. We contrast analyses employing both standard and sparse BMRMs, and positive matrix factorization (PMF). The sparse model better maintains source identity, as specified though informative prior distributions on elemental profiles. We advocate quantitative profile matching, which reveals that PMF primarily captures variations of the baseline profile for lichen secondary chemistry. Both PMF and BMRM results suggest that the most detectable signatures relate to aeolian dust deposition, while spatial patterns hint at sporadic anthropogenic influence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmetrics
Environmetrics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmetrics, the official journal of The International Environmetrics Society (TIES), an Association of the International Statistical Institute, is devoted to the dissemination of high-quality quantitative research in the environmental sciences. The journal welcomes pertinent and innovative submissions from quantitative disciplines developing new statistical and mathematical techniques, methods, and theories that solve modern environmental problems. Articles must proffer substantive, new statistical or mathematical advances to answer important scientific questions in the environmental sciences, or must develop novel or enhanced statistical methodology with clear applications to environmental science. New methods should be illustrated with recent environmental data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信