癌症远端胃切除术后Billroth II与Braun和Roux-en-Y重建术的比较:荟萃分析

Defei Chen, Chenglin Tang, Fan He, Fuyu Yang, Saed Woraikat, Kun Qian
{"title":"癌症远端胃切除术后Billroth II与Braun和Roux-en-Y重建术的比较:荟萃分析","authors":"Defei Chen,&nbsp;Chenglin Tang,&nbsp;Fan He,&nbsp;Fuyu Yang,&nbsp;Saed Woraikat,&nbsp;Kun Qian","doi":"10.1002/mog2.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Roux-en-Y (RY) and Billroth II with Braun (BB) reconstruction are two similar methods of reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (DG). Currently, it is unclear which method is superior. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of BB and RY reconstruction after DG for gastric cancer. A literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing BB with RY after DG for gastric cancer until the end of October 2022. Main outcomes assessed were perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, functional findings, and nutritional status. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Finally, eight studies with a total of 910 patients were considered for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results revealed that operation time, anastomosis time, incidence of total complications, and delayed gastric emptying were reduced, and the incidence of bile reflux was increased in patients undergoing BB compared to RY reconstruction. In conclusion, BB has the advantage of reducing operative time, anastomotic time, intraoperative blood loss, overall postoperative complications, and delayed gastric emptying. RY has the advantage of preventing bile reflux and gastritis after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":100902,"journal":{"name":"MedComm – Oncology","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mog2.48","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Billroth II with Braun and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Defei Chen,&nbsp;Chenglin Tang,&nbsp;Fan He,&nbsp;Fuyu Yang,&nbsp;Saed Woraikat,&nbsp;Kun Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mog2.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Roux-en-Y (RY) and Billroth II with Braun (BB) reconstruction are two similar methods of reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (DG). Currently, it is unclear which method is superior. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of BB and RY reconstruction after DG for gastric cancer. A literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing BB with RY after DG for gastric cancer until the end of October 2022. Main outcomes assessed were perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, functional findings, and nutritional status. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Finally, eight studies with a total of 910 patients were considered for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results revealed that operation time, anastomosis time, incidence of total complications, and delayed gastric emptying were reduced, and the incidence of bile reflux was increased in patients undergoing BB compared to RY reconstruction. In conclusion, BB has the advantage of reducing operative time, anastomotic time, intraoperative blood loss, overall postoperative complications, and delayed gastric emptying. RY has the advantage of preventing bile reflux and gastritis after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedComm – Oncology\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mog2.48\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedComm – Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mog2.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedComm – Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mog2.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Roux-en-Y(RY)和Billroth II联合Braun(BB)重建是两种类似的远端胃切除术后重建方法。目前,尚不清楚哪种方法更优越。本荟萃分析旨在比较DG后BB和RY重建治疗癌症的安全性和有效性。对Pubmed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆进行文献检索,以确定截至2022年10月底癌症DG后比较BB和RY的研究。评估的主要结果包括围手术期结果、术后并发症、功能发现和营养状况。使用RevMan 5.4软件进行荟萃分析。最后,对8项共910名患者的研究进行了荟萃分析。荟萃分析结果显示,与RY重建相比,BB重建患者的手术时间、吻合时间、总并发症发生率和胃排空延迟减少,胆汁反流发生率增加。总之,BB具有减少手术时间、吻合口时间、术中出血、术后并发症和延迟胃排空的优点。RY具有预防术后胆汁反流和胃炎的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Billroth II with Braun and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Comparison of Billroth II with Braun and Roux-en-Y reconstructions after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Roux-en-Y (RY) and Billroth II with Braun (BB) reconstruction are two similar methods of reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (DG). Currently, it is unclear which method is superior. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of BB and RY reconstruction after DG for gastric cancer. A literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing BB with RY after DG for gastric cancer until the end of October 2022. Main outcomes assessed were perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, functional findings, and nutritional status. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Finally, eight studies with a total of 910 patients were considered for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results revealed that operation time, anastomosis time, incidence of total complications, and delayed gastric emptying were reduced, and the incidence of bile reflux was increased in patients undergoing BB compared to RY reconstruction. In conclusion, BB has the advantage of reducing operative time, anastomotic time, intraoperative blood loss, overall postoperative complications, and delayed gastric emptying. RY has the advantage of preventing bile reflux and gastritis after surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信