中国还是美国机构投资者更善于监控企业盈余管理?来自中国股票在美国交叉上市市场的证据

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Chune Young Chung, Wonseok Choi
{"title":"中国还是美国机构投资者更善于监控企业盈余管理?来自中国股票在美国交叉上市市场的证据","authors":"Chune Young Chung,&nbsp;Wonseok Choi","doi":"10.1111/ajfs.12418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we empirically analyze Chinese firms listed on US exchanges to examine the standalone effects of geographic and market proximity on equity performance. In this regard, we find a negative association between Chinese institutional investors domiciled in the same country where investee firms are incorporated and improved earnings management. However, we find no significant relationship between US institutional ownership and earnings management. Hence, our findings support the geographic rather than the market proximity advantage. Furthermore, the geographic proximity advantage is more substantial in firms with high information opacity, and the results are not altered by choice of earnings management variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":8570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","volume":"52 2","pages":"242-263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Chinese or US Institutional Investors Better at Monitoring Corporate Earnings Management? Evidence from Chinese Stocks in the US Cross-Listing Market\",\"authors\":\"Chune Young Chung,&nbsp;Wonseok Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajfs.12418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, we empirically analyze Chinese firms listed on US exchanges to examine the standalone effects of geographic and market proximity on equity performance. In this regard, we find a negative association between Chinese institutional investors domiciled in the same country where investee firms are incorporated and improved earnings management. However, we find no significant relationship between US institutional ownership and earnings management. Hence, our findings support the geographic rather than the market proximity advantage. Furthermore, the geographic proximity advantage is more substantial in firms with high information opacity, and the results are not altered by choice of earnings management variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"242-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们实证分析了在美国交易所上市的中国公司,以检验地理和市场邻近度对股票表现的独立影响。在这方面,我们发现,在被投资公司注册所在国的中国机构投资者与改善盈余管理之间存在负相关。然而,我们发现美国机构所有权和盈余管理之间没有显著的关系。因此,我们的研究结果支持地理优势,而不是市场邻近优势。此外,在信息不透明性较高的公司中,地理邻近优势更为显著,并且收益管理变量的选择不会改变结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Chinese or US Institutional Investors Better at Monitoring Corporate Earnings Management? Evidence from Chinese Stocks in the US Cross-Listing Market

In this study, we empirically analyze Chinese firms listed on US exchanges to examine the standalone effects of geographic and market proximity on equity performance. In this regard, we find a negative association between Chinese institutional investors domiciled in the same country where investee firms are incorporated and improved earnings management. However, we find no significant relationship between US institutional ownership and earnings management. Hence, our findings support the geographic rather than the market proximity advantage. Furthermore, the geographic proximity advantage is more substantial in firms with high information opacity, and the results are not altered by choice of earnings management variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信