在本科生静力学课程中调查学生的动机目标、自我效能感和任务信念与课程出勤率和先验知识的关系

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nathaniel J. Hunsu, Olarenwaju P. Olaogun, Adurangba V. Oje, Peter H. Carnell, Beshoy Morkos
{"title":"在本科生静力学课程中调查学生的动机目标、自我效能感和任务信念与课程出勤率和先验知识的关系","authors":"Nathaniel J. Hunsu,&nbsp;Olarenwaju P. Olaogun,&nbsp;Adurangba V. Oje,&nbsp;Peter H. Carnell,&nbsp;Beshoy Morkos","doi":"10.1002/jee.20500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Student persistence in undergraduate engineering majors often depends on how they perform in foundational engineering courses. Although mastery of prerequisite knowledge affects how students perform in these courses, research suggests that achievement goal orientations and task-value and self-efficacy beliefs play prominent roles in predicting students' achievement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose/Hypothesis</h3>\n \n <p>Drawing on achievement goal, expectancy-value, and self-efficacy theories, this study explores the relationships and relative predictive significance of students' achievement goal orientations and task-value and self-efficacy beliefs on academic achievement when prior knowledge and class attendance in a foundational engineering course were accounted for.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design/Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants were students enrolled in engineering statics at a primarily White institution. A multiple regression analysis was conducted using achievement goals, self-efficacy for learning performance, task value, absence, and prior knowledge as predictor variables, and participants' achievement scores as the outcome variable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Positive relationships were observed between the different achievement goal constructs. The final regression model explained 50% of the variance in participants' achievement scores. Self-efficacy and task-value belief effects remained significant predictors of achievement, even after prior knowledge and regular class attendance were considered. Further, the combined effect of self-efficacy and task-value beliefs on achievement was larger than that of prior knowledge alone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Pedagogical approaches that seek to improve engineering students' task-value and self-efficacy beliefs may be more efficacious at promoting achievement than those that focus on fostering achievement goal orientations. Instructors should consider such approaches along with those that effectively address differences in prior knowledge in foundational engineering courses.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20500","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating students' motivational goals and self-efficacy and task beliefs in relationship to course attendance and prior knowledge in an undergraduate statics course\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel J. Hunsu,&nbsp;Olarenwaju P. Olaogun,&nbsp;Adurangba V. Oje,&nbsp;Peter H. Carnell,&nbsp;Beshoy Morkos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jee.20500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Student persistence in undergraduate engineering majors often depends on how they perform in foundational engineering courses. Although mastery of prerequisite knowledge affects how students perform in these courses, research suggests that achievement goal orientations and task-value and self-efficacy beliefs play prominent roles in predicting students' achievement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose/Hypothesis</h3>\\n \\n <p>Drawing on achievement goal, expectancy-value, and self-efficacy theories, this study explores the relationships and relative predictive significance of students' achievement goal orientations and task-value and self-efficacy beliefs on academic achievement when prior knowledge and class attendance in a foundational engineering course were accounted for.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design/Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants were students enrolled in engineering statics at a primarily White institution. A multiple regression analysis was conducted using achievement goals, self-efficacy for learning performance, task value, absence, and prior knowledge as predictor variables, and participants' achievement scores as the outcome variable.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Positive relationships were observed between the different achievement goal constructs. The final regression model explained 50% of the variance in participants' achievement scores. Self-efficacy and task-value belief effects remained significant predictors of achievement, even after prior knowledge and regular class attendance were considered. Further, the combined effect of self-efficacy and task-value beliefs on achievement was larger than that of prior knowledge alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pedagogical approaches that seek to improve engineering students' task-value and self-efficacy beliefs may be more efficacious at promoting achievement than those that focus on fostering achievement goal orientations. Instructors should consider such approaches along with those that effectively address differences in prior knowledge in foundational engineering courses.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20500\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.20500\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.20500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景工程专业本科生的毅力通常取决于他们在基础工程课程中的表现。尽管掌握先决条件知识会影响学生在这些课程中的表现,但研究表明,成就目标取向、任务价值观和自我效能信念在预测学生成就方面发挥着重要作用。目的/假设借鉴成就目标、期望值和自我效能理论,本研究探讨了在考虑基础工程课程的先验知识和出勤率的情况下,学生的成就目标取向与任务价值和自我效能信念对学业成绩的关系及其相对预测意义。设计/方法参与者是在一所以白人为主的学校注册的工程静力学学生。使用成就目标、学习表现自我效能感、任务价值、缺席和先验知识作为预测变量,参与者的成就得分作为结果变量,进行多元回归分析。结果不同成就目标结构之间存在正相关关系。最终的回归模型解释了参与者成绩得分50%的差异。自我效能感和任务价值信念效应仍然是成就的重要预测因素,即使在考虑了先前的知识和正常的课堂出勤率之后也是如此。此外,自我效能感和任务价值信念对成就的综合影响大于单独的先验知识。结论寻求提高工科学生任务价值和自我效能信念的教学方法可能比注重培养成就目标导向的教学方法更有效地促进成就。教师应考虑这些方法以及有效解决基础工程课程中先验知识差异的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigating students' motivational goals and self-efficacy and task beliefs in relationship to course attendance and prior knowledge in an undergraduate statics course

Investigating students' motivational goals and self-efficacy and task beliefs in relationship to course attendance and prior knowledge in an undergraduate statics course

Background

Student persistence in undergraduate engineering majors often depends on how they perform in foundational engineering courses. Although mastery of prerequisite knowledge affects how students perform in these courses, research suggests that achievement goal orientations and task-value and self-efficacy beliefs play prominent roles in predicting students' achievement.

Purpose/Hypothesis

Drawing on achievement goal, expectancy-value, and self-efficacy theories, this study explores the relationships and relative predictive significance of students' achievement goal orientations and task-value and self-efficacy beliefs on academic achievement when prior knowledge and class attendance in a foundational engineering course were accounted for.

Design/Method

Participants were students enrolled in engineering statics at a primarily White institution. A multiple regression analysis was conducted using achievement goals, self-efficacy for learning performance, task value, absence, and prior knowledge as predictor variables, and participants' achievement scores as the outcome variable.

Results

Positive relationships were observed between the different achievement goal constructs. The final regression model explained 50% of the variance in participants' achievement scores. Self-efficacy and task-value belief effects remained significant predictors of achievement, even after prior knowledge and regular class attendance were considered. Further, the combined effect of self-efficacy and task-value beliefs on achievement was larger than that of prior knowledge alone.

Conclusions

Pedagogical approaches that seek to improve engineering students' task-value and self-efficacy beliefs may be more efficacious at promoting achievement than those that focus on fostering achievement goal orientations. Instructors should consider such approaches along with those that effectively address differences in prior knowledge in foundational engineering courses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信