气候变化对地下水位变化的影响评估:混合模型技术研究

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Stephen Afrifa, Tao Zhang, Xin Zhao, Peter Appiahene, Mensah Samuel Yaw
{"title":"气候变化对地下水位变化的影响评估:混合模型技术研究","authors":"Stephen Afrifa,&nbsp;Tao Zhang,&nbsp;Xin Zhao,&nbsp;Peter Appiahene,&nbsp;Mensah Samuel Yaw","doi":"10.1049/sil2.12227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the most important sources of water supply is groundwater. However, the groundwater level (GWL) is significantly impacted by the global climate change. Therefore, under these more severe climate change conditions, the accurate and simple forecast of farmland GWL is a crucial component of agricultural water management. A hybrid model (HM) of Bayesian random forest (BRF), Bayesian support vector machine (BSVM), and Bayesian artificial neural network (BANN) is built in this study. The HM is made up of a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and three machine learning models: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network. These three HMs are employed to help automate logical inference and decision-making in business intelligence for groundwater management. For this purpose, data on 8 separate climatic factors that impact GWL changes in the study area were acquired. Nine distinct farming communities' GWL change data were utilised as the dependent variables for each model fit (community data). The effectiveness of the HM techniques was assessed using the evaluation metrics of mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The model fit in Suhum had the greatest performance with the highest accuracy (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> varied from 0.9051 to 0.9679) and the lowest error scores (RMSE ranged from 0.0653 to 0.0727, and MAE ranged from 0.0121 to 0.0541), according to the models' evaluation results. The BRF delivered the greatest results when compared to the two independent HMs, the BSVM and BANN. Future GWL and climatic variable data may be trained using the trained HM techniques to determine the effects of climate change. Farmers, businesses, and civil society organisations might benefit from continuous monitoring of GWL data and education on climate change to help control and prevent excessive deteriorations of global climate change on GWL.</p>","PeriodicalId":56301,"journal":{"name":"IET Signal Processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/sil2.12227","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate change impact assessment on groundwater level changes: A study of hybrid model techniques\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Afrifa,&nbsp;Tao Zhang,&nbsp;Xin Zhao,&nbsp;Peter Appiahene,&nbsp;Mensah Samuel Yaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/sil2.12227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>One of the most important sources of water supply is groundwater. However, the groundwater level (GWL) is significantly impacted by the global climate change. Therefore, under these more severe climate change conditions, the accurate and simple forecast of farmland GWL is a crucial component of agricultural water management. A hybrid model (HM) of Bayesian random forest (BRF), Bayesian support vector machine (BSVM), and Bayesian artificial neural network (BANN) is built in this study. The HM is made up of a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and three machine learning models: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network. These three HMs are employed to help automate logical inference and decision-making in business intelligence for groundwater management. For this purpose, data on 8 separate climatic factors that impact GWL changes in the study area were acquired. Nine distinct farming communities' GWL change data were utilised as the dependent variables for each model fit (community data). The effectiveness of the HM techniques was assessed using the evaluation metrics of mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The model fit in Suhum had the greatest performance with the highest accuracy (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> varied from 0.9051 to 0.9679) and the lowest error scores (RMSE ranged from 0.0653 to 0.0727, and MAE ranged from 0.0121 to 0.0541), according to the models' evaluation results. The BRF delivered the greatest results when compared to the two independent HMs, the BSVM and BANN. Future GWL and climatic variable data may be trained using the trained HM techniques to determine the effects of climate change. Farmers, businesses, and civil society organisations might benefit from continuous monitoring of GWL data and education on climate change to help control and prevent excessive deteriorations of global climate change on GWL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Signal Processing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/sil2.12227\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/sil2.12227\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/sil2.12227","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下水是最重要的水源之一。然而,地下水位(GWL)受到全球气候变化的严重影响。因此,在这些更加严峻的气候变化条件下,准确、简单地预测农田GWL是农业用水管理的重要组成部分。本研究建立了贝叶斯随机森林(BRF)、贝叶斯支持向量机(BSVM)和贝叶斯人工神经网络(BANN)的混合模型。HM由贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)和三个机器学习模型组成:随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络。这三个HM用于帮助地下水管理商业智能中的逻辑推理和决策自动化。为此,获得了影响研究区域GWL变化的8个独立气候因素的数据。九个不同农业社区的GWL变化数据被用作每个模型拟合的因变量(社区数据)。HM技术的有效性使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、决定系数(R2)、平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和均方根误差(RMSE)的评估指标进行评估。根据模型的评估结果,Suhum的模型拟合具有最高的性能,具有最高的精度(R2在0.9051到0.9679之间)和最低的误差分数(RMSE在0.0653到0.0727之间,MAE在0.0121到0.0541之间)。与BSVM和BANN这两个独立的HM相比,BRF提供了最大的结果。未来的GWL和气候变量数据可以使用经过训练的HM技术进行训练,以确定气候变化的影响。农民、企业和民间社会组织可能会从持续监测全球变暖数据和气候变化教育中受益,以帮助控制和防止全球气候变化对全球变暖的过度恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Climate change impact assessment on groundwater level changes: A study of hybrid model techniques

Climate change impact assessment on groundwater level changes: A study of hybrid model techniques

One of the most important sources of water supply is groundwater. However, the groundwater level (GWL) is significantly impacted by the global climate change. Therefore, under these more severe climate change conditions, the accurate and simple forecast of farmland GWL is a crucial component of agricultural water management. A hybrid model (HM) of Bayesian random forest (BRF), Bayesian support vector machine (BSVM), and Bayesian artificial neural network (BANN) is built in this study. The HM is made up of a Bayesian model averaging (BMA) and three machine learning models: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network. These three HMs are employed to help automate logical inference and decision-making in business intelligence for groundwater management. For this purpose, data on 8 separate climatic factors that impact GWL changes in the study area were acquired. Nine distinct farming communities' GWL change data were utilised as the dependent variables for each model fit (community data). The effectiveness of the HM techniques was assessed using the evaluation metrics of mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute percent error (MAPE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The model fit in Suhum had the greatest performance with the highest accuracy (R2 varied from 0.9051 to 0.9679) and the lowest error scores (RMSE ranged from 0.0653 to 0.0727, and MAE ranged from 0.0121 to 0.0541), according to the models' evaluation results. The BRF delivered the greatest results when compared to the two independent HMs, the BSVM and BANN. Future GWL and climatic variable data may be trained using the trained HM techniques to determine the effects of climate change. Farmers, businesses, and civil society organisations might benefit from continuous monitoring of GWL data and education on climate change to help control and prevent excessive deteriorations of global climate change on GWL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IET Signal Processing
IET Signal Processing 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
9.5 months
期刊介绍: IET Signal Processing publishes research on a diverse range of signal processing and machine learning topics, covering a variety of applications, disciplines, modalities, and techniques in detection, estimation, inference, and classification problems. The research published includes advances in algorithm design for the analysis of single and high-multi-dimensional data, sparsity, linear and non-linear systems, recursive and non-recursive digital filters and multi-rate filter banks, as well a range of topics that span from sensor array processing, deep convolutional neural network based approaches to the application of chaos theory, and far more. Topics covered by scope include, but are not limited to: advances in single and multi-dimensional filter design and implementation linear and nonlinear, fixed and adaptive digital filters and multirate filter banks statistical signal processing techniques and analysis classical, parametric and higher order spectral analysis signal transformation and compression techniques, including time-frequency analysis system modelling and adaptive identification techniques machine learning based approaches to signal processing Bayesian methods for signal processing, including Monte-Carlo Markov-chain and particle filtering techniques theory and application of blind and semi-blind signal separation techniques signal processing techniques for analysis, enhancement, coding, synthesis and recognition of speech signals direction-finding and beamforming techniques for audio and electromagnetic signals analysis techniques for biomedical signals baseband signal processing techniques for transmission and reception of communication signals signal processing techniques for data hiding and audio watermarking sparse signal processing and compressive sensing Special Issue Call for Papers: Intelligent Deep Fuzzy Model for Signal Processing - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_SPR_CFP_IDFMSP.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信