探讨投资者的金融素养与证券贷款顾问使用之间的关系

Matthew Sommer, Timothy M. Todd, HanNa Lim
{"title":"探讨投资者的金融素养与证券贷款顾问使用之间的关系","authors":"Matthew Sommer,&nbsp;Timothy M. Todd,&nbsp;HanNa Lim","doi":"10.1002/cfp2.1166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Past literature has explored the characteristics of individuals who use high-interest and tax-inefficient consumer debt products, such as carrying a monthly credit card balance and engaging with alternative financial services. That literature revealed that users of these debt products tended to be financially constrained households faced with an immediate liquidity need, and that they had lower levels of financial literacy. Much less is known, however, about the role financial literacy may play when a more advantageous solution may be available but not used—an example of which is securities-based loans, which offer lower rates and potential tax preferences. Therefore, this study used the 2018 National Financial Capability Study to examine why investors use traditional debt products when they could likely have qualified for a securities-based loan. Using bounded rationality as a theoretical framework, this research advances the literature in consumer debt and borrowing decisions. The results found that objective knowledge, as opposed to self-assessed ability or confidence, explained the use of optimal debt products. Additionally, advisor engagement was positively associated with securities-based loan use.</p>","PeriodicalId":100529,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the relationship between investors' financial literacy and advisor use with securities-based loans\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Sommer,&nbsp;Timothy M. Todd,&nbsp;HanNa Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cfp2.1166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Past literature has explored the characteristics of individuals who use high-interest and tax-inefficient consumer debt products, such as carrying a monthly credit card balance and engaging with alternative financial services. That literature revealed that users of these debt products tended to be financially constrained households faced with an immediate liquidity need, and that they had lower levels of financial literacy. Much less is known, however, about the role financial literacy may play when a more advantageous solution may be available but not used—an example of which is securities-based loans, which offer lower rates and potential tax preferences. Therefore, this study used the 2018 National Financial Capability Study to examine why investors use traditional debt products when they could likely have qualified for a securities-based loan. Using bounded rationality as a theoretical framework, this research advances the literature in consumer debt and borrowing decisions. The results found that objective knowledge, as opposed to self-assessed ability or confidence, explained the use of optimal debt products. Additionally, advisor engagement was positively associated with securities-based loan use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.1166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL PLANNING REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cfp2.1166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去的文献探讨了使用高息低税消费债务产品的个人特征,例如每月持有信用卡余额和从事替代金融服务。该文献显示,这些债务产品的用户往往是面临直接流动性需求的经济拮据的家庭,而且他们的金融知识水平较低。然而,当一种更有利的解决方案可能可用但没有使用时,人们对金融知识可能发挥的作用知之甚少——一个例子是基于证券的贷款,它提供更低的利率和潜在的税收优惠。因此,这项研究利用2018年国家金融能力研究来检验投资者为什么在可能有资格获得证券贷款的情况下使用传统债务产品。本研究以有限理性为理论框架,对消费者债务和借贷决策方面的文献进行了研究。结果发现,与自我评估的能力或信心相反,客观知识解释了最佳债务产品的使用。此外,顾问参与与基于证券的贷款使用呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the relationship between investors' financial literacy and advisor use with securities-based loans

Past literature has explored the characteristics of individuals who use high-interest and tax-inefficient consumer debt products, such as carrying a monthly credit card balance and engaging with alternative financial services. That literature revealed that users of these debt products tended to be financially constrained households faced with an immediate liquidity need, and that they had lower levels of financial literacy. Much less is known, however, about the role financial literacy may play when a more advantageous solution may be available but not used—an example of which is securities-based loans, which offer lower rates and potential tax preferences. Therefore, this study used the 2018 National Financial Capability Study to examine why investors use traditional debt products when they could likely have qualified for a securities-based loan. Using bounded rationality as a theoretical framework, this research advances the literature in consumer debt and borrowing decisions. The results found that objective knowledge, as opposed to self-assessed ability or confidence, explained the use of optimal debt products. Additionally, advisor engagement was positively associated with securities-based loan use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信