{"title":"继续宣言对话:建立营销学科的更新能力","authors":"Sreedhar Madhavaram, Hunter N. Hatfield","doi":"10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The six commentaries on Hunt, Madhavaram, and Hatfield (hereafter, HMH, <i>AMS Review</i>, 2022, in this issue) and “the manifesto conversation” (hereafter, TMC) deeply reflected on HMH and TMC; assessed, among other things, the value of borrowed theories, doctoral programs, fragmentation, indigenous theory development, mainstream central focus, middle-range theories, and stakeholder relevance/engagement; and provided further foundations and put forward several opportunities for continuing TMC toward <i>renewing</i> the marketing discipline. In response, we develop a new conceptualization for <i>renewal capability</i>, and elaborate that <i>renewal capability building</i> (for the marketing discipline) entails policies, activities, and decisions for bringing together human (e.g., its scholars and stakeholders) and institutional resources (e.g., its journals and professional associations) to produce proactive and reactive innovations (for the marketing discipline). Overall, HMH, TMC, the six commentaries, and this response cumulatively provide foundations for continuing the TMC toward building a robust <i>renewal capability</i> for the marketing discipline.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"12 3-4","pages":"188 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline\",\"authors\":\"Sreedhar Madhavaram, Hunter N. Hatfield\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The six commentaries on Hunt, Madhavaram, and Hatfield (hereafter, HMH, <i>AMS Review</i>, 2022, in this issue) and “the manifesto conversation” (hereafter, TMC) deeply reflected on HMH and TMC; assessed, among other things, the value of borrowed theories, doctoral programs, fragmentation, indigenous theory development, mainstream central focus, middle-range theories, and stakeholder relevance/engagement; and provided further foundations and put forward several opportunities for continuing TMC toward <i>renewing</i> the marketing discipline. In response, we develop a new conceptualization for <i>renewal capability</i>, and elaborate that <i>renewal capability building</i> (for the marketing discipline) entails policies, activities, and decisions for bringing together human (e.g., its scholars and stakeholders) and institutional resources (e.g., its journals and professional associations) to produce proactive and reactive innovations (for the marketing discipline). Overall, HMH, TMC, the six commentaries, and this response cumulatively provide foundations for continuing the TMC toward building a robust <i>renewal capability</i> for the marketing discipline.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMS Review\",\"volume\":\"12 3-4\",\"pages\":\"188 - 195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMS Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-022-00248-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuing the manifesto conversation: Toward building a renewal capability for the marketing discipline
The six commentaries on Hunt, Madhavaram, and Hatfield (hereafter, HMH, AMS Review, 2022, in this issue) and “the manifesto conversation” (hereafter, TMC) deeply reflected on HMH and TMC; assessed, among other things, the value of borrowed theories, doctoral programs, fragmentation, indigenous theory development, mainstream central focus, middle-range theories, and stakeholder relevance/engagement; and provided further foundations and put forward several opportunities for continuing TMC toward renewing the marketing discipline. In response, we develop a new conceptualization for renewal capability, and elaborate that renewal capability building (for the marketing discipline) entails policies, activities, and decisions for bringing together human (e.g., its scholars and stakeholders) and institutional resources (e.g., its journals and professional associations) to produce proactive and reactive innovations (for the marketing discipline). Overall, HMH, TMC, the six commentaries, and this response cumulatively provide foundations for continuing the TMC toward building a robust renewal capability for the marketing discipline.
AMS ReviewBusiness, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍:
The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication. The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.