深度学习应用于机器状态监测的最新进展——第2部分:补充观点和案例研究

IF 1.7 4区 物理与天体物理
Wenyi Wang, John Taylor, Robert J. Rees
{"title":"深度学习应用于机器状态监测的最新进展——第2部分:补充观点和案例研究","authors":"Wenyi Wang,&nbsp;John Taylor,&nbsp;Robert J. Rees","doi":"10.1007/s40857-021-00235-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the huge success of applying deep learning (DL) methodologies to image recognition and natural language processing in recent years, researchers are now keen to use them in the machine condition monitoring (MCM) context. There are numerous papers in applying various DL techniques, such as auto-encoder, restricted Boltzmann machine, convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network, to MCM problems ranging from component level condition monitoring (machine tool wear prediction, bearing fault diagnosis and classification and hydraulic pump fault diagnosis) to system level health management (aircraft and spacecraft diagnosis). In this paper, we give a brief overview in the area of DL for MCM with a focus on reviewing the most recent papers published since 2019. In Part 1, we present some critical views regarding whether any breakthrough has been achieved from an MCM domain expert perspective, with the main conclusion that DL has great potential for MCM applications and a major breakthrough could come soon since the shortfalls lie more in data than in the DL methodologies. Our overall impression is that (a) DL models are not really showing their great potentials with only a small training data; (b) faulty-condition data is hard to come by for training DL, but normal condition data is abundant, so anomaly detection makes more sense; (c) applying DL only to the Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) bearing fault dataset is not sufficient for real-world industrial applications as it was from a very simple test rig, and applying DL to data from complex systems like helicopter gearbox data may deliver much more convincing results. In Part 2, we enhance the main conclusion of the critical review with supplement views and a case study on analyzing Bell-206B helicopter main gearbox planet bearing failure data using some traditional MCM techniques in contrast to applying the long short-term memory (LSTM) DL method. We can conclude from the case study that the DL-based methods are not necessarily always superior to the traditional MCM techniques for dataset from moderately complex machinery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54355,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics Australia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40857-021-00235-4","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Advancement of Deep Learning Applications to Machine Condition Monitoring Part 2: Supplement Views and a Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Wenyi Wang,&nbsp;John Taylor,&nbsp;Robert J. Rees\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40857-021-00235-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the huge success of applying deep learning (DL) methodologies to image recognition and natural language processing in recent years, researchers are now keen to use them in the machine condition monitoring (MCM) context. There are numerous papers in applying various DL techniques, such as auto-encoder, restricted Boltzmann machine, convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network, to MCM problems ranging from component level condition monitoring (machine tool wear prediction, bearing fault diagnosis and classification and hydraulic pump fault diagnosis) to system level health management (aircraft and spacecraft diagnosis). In this paper, we give a brief overview in the area of DL for MCM with a focus on reviewing the most recent papers published since 2019. In Part 1, we present some critical views regarding whether any breakthrough has been achieved from an MCM domain expert perspective, with the main conclusion that DL has great potential for MCM applications and a major breakthrough could come soon since the shortfalls lie more in data than in the DL methodologies. Our overall impression is that (a) DL models are not really showing their great potentials with only a small training data; (b) faulty-condition data is hard to come by for training DL, but normal condition data is abundant, so anomaly detection makes more sense; (c) applying DL only to the Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) bearing fault dataset is not sufficient for real-world industrial applications as it was from a very simple test rig, and applying DL to data from complex systems like helicopter gearbox data may deliver much more convincing results. In Part 2, we enhance the main conclusion of the critical review with supplement views and a case study on analyzing Bell-206B helicopter main gearbox planet bearing failure data using some traditional MCM techniques in contrast to applying the long short-term memory (LSTM) DL method. We can conclude from the case study that the DL-based methods are not necessarily always superior to the traditional MCM techniques for dataset from moderately complex machinery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acoustics Australia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40857-021-00235-4\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acoustics Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-021-00235-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics Australia","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40857-021-00235-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

近年来,随着深度学习(DL)方法在图像识别和自然语言处理中的巨大成功,研究人员现在热衷于将其用于机器状态监测(MCM)环境。在应用各种DL技术方面有许多论文,如自动编码器、限制Boltzmann机、卷积神经网络和递归神经网络,到MCM问题,从部件级状态监测(机床磨损预测、轴承故障诊断和分类以及液压泵故障诊断)到系统级健康管理(飞机和航天器诊断)。在本文中,我们简要概述了MCM的DL领域,重点回顾了自2019年以来发表的最新论文。在第1部分中,我们从MCM领域专家的角度提出了一些关于是否取得了任何突破的关键观点,主要结论是DL在MCM应用中具有巨大潜力,并且可能很快就会取得重大突破,因为不足更多地在于数据而非DL方法。我们的总体印象是:(a)DL模型并没有用少量的训练数据真正显示出它们的巨大潜力;(b) 故障状态数据很难用于训练DL,但正常状态数据丰富,因此异常检测更有意义;(c) 仅将DL应用于凯斯西储大学(CWRU)轴承故障数据集对于真实世界的工业应用是不够的,因为它是从一个非常简单的试验台中获得的,并且将DL应用到直升机变速箱数据等复杂系统的数据可能会产生更令人信服的结果。在第2部分中,我们通过补充观点和案例研究来加强批判性综述的主要结论,即使用一些传统的MCM技术分析Bell-206B直升机主齿轮箱行星轴承故障数据,而不是应用长短期记忆(LSTM)DL方法。我们可以从案例研究中得出结论,对于来自中等复杂机械的数据集,基于DL的方法并不一定总是优于传统的MCM技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent Advancement of Deep Learning Applications to Machine Condition Monitoring Part 2: Supplement Views and a Case Study

With the huge success of applying deep learning (DL) methodologies to image recognition and natural language processing in recent years, researchers are now keen to use them in the machine condition monitoring (MCM) context. There are numerous papers in applying various DL techniques, such as auto-encoder, restricted Boltzmann machine, convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network, to MCM problems ranging from component level condition monitoring (machine tool wear prediction, bearing fault diagnosis and classification and hydraulic pump fault diagnosis) to system level health management (aircraft and spacecraft diagnosis). In this paper, we give a brief overview in the area of DL for MCM with a focus on reviewing the most recent papers published since 2019. In Part 1, we present some critical views regarding whether any breakthrough has been achieved from an MCM domain expert perspective, with the main conclusion that DL has great potential for MCM applications and a major breakthrough could come soon since the shortfalls lie more in data than in the DL methodologies. Our overall impression is that (a) DL models are not really showing their great potentials with only a small training data; (b) faulty-condition data is hard to come by for training DL, but normal condition data is abundant, so anomaly detection makes more sense; (c) applying DL only to the Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) bearing fault dataset is not sufficient for real-world industrial applications as it was from a very simple test rig, and applying DL to data from complex systems like helicopter gearbox data may deliver much more convincing results. In Part 2, we enhance the main conclusion of the critical review with supplement views and a case study on analyzing Bell-206B helicopter main gearbox planet bearing failure data using some traditional MCM techniques in contrast to applying the long short-term memory (LSTM) DL method. We can conclude from the case study that the DL-based methods are not necessarily always superior to the traditional MCM techniques for dataset from moderately complex machinery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acoustics Australia
Acoustics Australia ACOUSTICS-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Acoustics Australia, the journal of the Australian Acoustical Society, has been publishing high quality research and technical papers in all areas of acoustics since commencement in 1972. The target audience for the journal includes both researchers and practitioners. It aims to publish papers and technical notes that are relevant to current acoustics and of interest to members of the Society. These include but are not limited to: Architectural and Building Acoustics, Environmental Noise, Underwater Acoustics, Engineering Noise and Vibration Control, Occupational Noise Management, Hearing, Musical Acoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信