混合动力火箭发动机推力和混合比的变化与控制

Francesco Barato, Elena Toson, Daniele Pavarin
{"title":"混合动力火箭发动机推力和混合比的变化与控制","authors":"Francesco Barato,&nbsp;Elena Toson,&nbsp;Daniele Pavarin","doi":"10.1007/s42423-021-00076-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hybrid rocket motors have several attracting characteristics such as simplicity, low cost, safety, reliability, environmental friendliness. In particular, hybrid rockets can provide complex and flexible thrust profiles not possible with solid rockets in a simpler way than liquid rockets, controlling only a single fluid. Unfortunately, the drawback of this feature is that the mixture ratio cannot be directly controlled but depends on the specific regression rate law. Therefore, in the general case the mixture ratio changes with time and with throttling. Thrust could also change with time for a fixed oxidizer flow. Moreover, propellant residuals are generated by the mixture ratio shift if the throttling profile is not known in advance. The penalties incurred could be more or less significant depending on the mission profile and requirements. In this paper, some proposed ways to mitigate or eliminate these issues are recalled, quantitatively analysed and compared with the standard case. In particular, the addition of energetic additives to influence the regression rate law, the injection of oxidizer in the post-chamber and the altering-intensity swirling-oxidizer-flow injection are discussed. The first option exploits the pressure dependency of the fuel regression to mitigate the shift during throttling. The other two techniques can control both the mixture ratio and thrust, at least in a certain range, at the expense of an increase of the architecture complexity. Moreover, some other options like pulse width modulation or multi-chamber configuration are also presented. Finally, a review of the techniques to achieve high throttling ratios keeping motor stability and efficiency is also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100039,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"55 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42423-021-00076-3","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations and Control of Thrust and Mixture Ratio in Hybrid Rocket Motors\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Barato,&nbsp;Elena Toson,&nbsp;Daniele Pavarin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42423-021-00076-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hybrid rocket motors have several attracting characteristics such as simplicity, low cost, safety, reliability, environmental friendliness. In particular, hybrid rockets can provide complex and flexible thrust profiles not possible with solid rockets in a simpler way than liquid rockets, controlling only a single fluid. Unfortunately, the drawback of this feature is that the mixture ratio cannot be directly controlled but depends on the specific regression rate law. Therefore, in the general case the mixture ratio changes with time and with throttling. Thrust could also change with time for a fixed oxidizer flow. Moreover, propellant residuals are generated by the mixture ratio shift if the throttling profile is not known in advance. The penalties incurred could be more or less significant depending on the mission profile and requirements. In this paper, some proposed ways to mitigate or eliminate these issues are recalled, quantitatively analysed and compared with the standard case. In particular, the addition of energetic additives to influence the regression rate law, the injection of oxidizer in the post-chamber and the altering-intensity swirling-oxidizer-flow injection are discussed. The first option exploits the pressure dependency of the fuel regression to mitigate the shift during throttling. The other two techniques can control both the mixture ratio and thrust, at least in a certain range, at the expense of an increase of the architecture complexity. Moreover, some other options like pulse width modulation or multi-chamber configuration are also presented. Finally, a review of the techniques to achieve high throttling ratios keeping motor stability and efficiency is also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"55 - 76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42423-021-00076-3\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42423-021-00076-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42423-021-00076-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

混合动力火箭发动机具有简单、低成本、安全、可靠、环保等特点。特别是,混合动力火箭可以以比液体火箭更简单的方式提供复杂灵活的推力剖面,而固体火箭不可能做到这一点,只控制单一流体。不幸的是,这种特征的缺点是混合比不能直接控制,而是取决于特定的回归速率定律。因此,在一般情况下,混合比随时间和节流而变化。对于固定的氧化剂流量,推力也可能随时间变化。此外,如果事先不知道节流轮廓,则混合比变化会产生推进剂残留物。根据特派团的情况和要求,所产生的处罚可能或多或少很严重。本文回顾了一些缓解或消除这些问题的方法,并对其进行了定量分析,并与标准案例进行了比较。特别地,讨论了添加高能添加剂以影响回归速率定律、氧化剂在后室中的注入以及改变强度的旋流氧化剂流注入。第一种选择利用燃料回归的压力依赖性来减轻节流过程中的偏移。另外两种技术可以控制混合比和推力,至少在一定范围内,而牺牲了结构复杂性的增加。此外,还提出了一些其他选择,如脉冲宽度调制或多腔配置。最后,还对实现高节流比以保持电机稳定性和效率的技术进行了综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variations and Control of Thrust and Mixture Ratio in Hybrid Rocket Motors

Hybrid rocket motors have several attracting characteristics such as simplicity, low cost, safety, reliability, environmental friendliness. In particular, hybrid rockets can provide complex and flexible thrust profiles not possible with solid rockets in a simpler way than liquid rockets, controlling only a single fluid. Unfortunately, the drawback of this feature is that the mixture ratio cannot be directly controlled but depends on the specific regression rate law. Therefore, in the general case the mixture ratio changes with time and with throttling. Thrust could also change with time for a fixed oxidizer flow. Moreover, propellant residuals are generated by the mixture ratio shift if the throttling profile is not known in advance. The penalties incurred could be more or less significant depending on the mission profile and requirements. In this paper, some proposed ways to mitigate or eliminate these issues are recalled, quantitatively analysed and compared with the standard case. In particular, the addition of energetic additives to influence the regression rate law, the injection of oxidizer in the post-chamber and the altering-intensity swirling-oxidizer-flow injection are discussed. The first option exploits the pressure dependency of the fuel regression to mitigate the shift during throttling. The other two techniques can control both the mixture ratio and thrust, at least in a certain range, at the expense of an increase of the architecture complexity. Moreover, some other options like pulse width modulation or multi-chamber configuration are also presented. Finally, a review of the techniques to achieve high throttling ratios keeping motor stability and efficiency is also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信