在树尺度评估生产差距:西非芒果(Mangifera indica L.)的定义和应用

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Julien Sarron, Emile Faye, Thibault Nordey, Jeanne Diatta, Frédéric Normand, Damien Beillouin, Eric Malézieux
{"title":"在树尺度评估生产差距:西非芒果(Mangifera indica L.)的定义和应用","authors":"Julien Sarron,&nbsp;Emile Faye,&nbsp;Thibault Nordey,&nbsp;Jeanne Diatta,&nbsp;Frédéric Normand,&nbsp;Damien Beillouin,&nbsp;Eric Malézieux","doi":"10.1007/s13593-023-00920-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fruit tree productivity is generally low and highly variable in the tropics. Quantifying yield gaps and their determining factors provides levers to increase production, but yield gap of fruit trees remains poorly explored at the tree scale. In order to bridge this knowledge gap, we adapted the concept of yield gap to define the production gap at the tree scale to integrate tree endogenous factors (cultivar, age, and crown dimensions). The production gap (<i>P</i><sub>g</sub>) was defined as the difference between potential tree production (<i>P</i><sub>p</sub>) and actual tree production (<i>P</i><sub>a</sub>). The concept was implemented for mango trees in West Africa. We estimated these production indicators on 280 mango trees for two years, covering a wide range of fruit load, age, cultivars, and cropping systems (extensive, diversified, and intensive) found in Senegal. Actual production was estimated yearly using ground tree image analysis. Attainable production (<i>P</i><sub>att</sub>, a locally constrained approximation of <i>P</i><sub>p</sub>) was estimated based on tree endogenous and climatic factors using stochastic frontier analysis. Our results showed that attainable production increased with tree crown area and trunk diameter, whereas the effects of tree density, temperature, and solar radiation were cultivar-dependent. On average, the actual production reached 63% of the attainable production. The production gap was higher in extensive orchards (<i>P</i><sub>g</sub> = 58% of <i>P</i><sub>att</sub>) compared to diversified (<i>P</i><sub>g</sub> = 29% of <i>P</i><sub>att</sub>) and intensive (<i>P</i><sub>g</sub> = 32% of <i>P</i><sub>att</sub>) orchards. Based on production gap estimation, we identified the drivers of mango production variation among cultivars and cropping systems in West Africa. This study demonstrates the usefulness of adapting yield gap methodology to the tree scale to analyze production gaps in diverse fruit tree-based cropping systems. Measurement of production gaps allows the integration of tree features and their variability to upscale and improve the estimation of yield gaps at the orchard scale.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing production gaps at the tree scale: definition and application to mango (Mangifera indica L.) in West Africa\",\"authors\":\"Julien Sarron,&nbsp;Emile Faye,&nbsp;Thibault Nordey,&nbsp;Jeanne Diatta,&nbsp;Frédéric Normand,&nbsp;Damien Beillouin,&nbsp;Eric Malézieux\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13593-023-00920-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fruit tree productivity is generally low and highly variable in the tropics. Quantifying yield gaps and their determining factors provides levers to increase production, but yield gap of fruit trees remains poorly explored at the tree scale. In order to bridge this knowledge gap, we adapted the concept of yield gap to define the production gap at the tree scale to integrate tree endogenous factors (cultivar, age, and crown dimensions). The production gap (<i>P</i><sub>g</sub>) was defined as the difference between potential tree production (<i>P</i><sub>p</sub>) and actual tree production (<i>P</i><sub>a</sub>). The concept was implemented for mango trees in West Africa. We estimated these production indicators on 280 mango trees for two years, covering a wide range of fruit load, age, cultivars, and cropping systems (extensive, diversified, and intensive) found in Senegal. Actual production was estimated yearly using ground tree image analysis. Attainable production (<i>P</i><sub>att</sub>, a locally constrained approximation of <i>P</i><sub>p</sub>) was estimated based on tree endogenous and climatic factors using stochastic frontier analysis. Our results showed that attainable production increased with tree crown area and trunk diameter, whereas the effects of tree density, temperature, and solar radiation were cultivar-dependent. On average, the actual production reached 63% of the attainable production. The production gap was higher in extensive orchards (<i>P</i><sub>g</sub> = 58% of <i>P</i><sub>att</sub>) compared to diversified (<i>P</i><sub>g</sub> = 29% of <i>P</i><sub>att</sub>) and intensive (<i>P</i><sub>g</sub> = 32% of <i>P</i><sub>att</sub>) orchards. Based on production gap estimation, we identified the drivers of mango production variation among cultivars and cropping systems in West Africa. This study demonstrates the usefulness of adapting yield gap methodology to the tree scale to analyze production gaps in diverse fruit tree-based cropping systems. Measurement of production gaps allows the integration of tree features and their variability to upscale and improve the estimation of yield gaps at the orchard scale.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00920-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-023-00920-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热带地区的果树生产力一般很低,而且变化很大。量化产量缺口及其决定因素为提高产量提供了杠杆,但在树尺度上对果树产量缺口的研究仍然很少。为了弥补这一知识差距,我们采用了产量差距的概念来定义树尺度上的生产差距,以整合树木的内源因素(品种、年龄和树冠尺寸)。生产缺口(Pg)定义为林木潜在产量(Pp)与实际产量(Pa)之差。这个概念在西非的芒果树上得到了应用。我们对塞内加尔280棵芒果树进行了为期两年的生产指标估计,涵盖了广泛的果实负荷、年龄、品种和种植制度(粗放型、多样化和集约化)。使用地面树木图像分析估计每年的实际产量。基于树木内源和气候因素,利用随机前沿分析估计了可达到产量(局部约束ppt近似值)。结果表明,可得产量随树冠面积和树干直径的增加而增加,而树密度、温度和太阳辐射的影响则与品种有关。平均而言,实际产量达到了可达到产量的63%。粗放型果园的产量差距(Pg = 58%)大于多元化果园(Pg = 29%)和集约型果园(Pg = 32%)。基于生产差距估计,我们确定了西非芒果品种和种植制度之间产量变化的驱动因素。本研究证明了将产量缺口方法应用于树尺度来分析不同果树种植系统的生产缺口的有效性。生产差距的测量可以整合树木特征及其可变性,以提高和改善果园规模产量差距的估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing production gaps at the tree scale: definition and application to mango (Mangifera indica L.) in West Africa

Assessing production gaps at the tree scale: definition and application to mango (Mangifera indica L.) in West Africa

Fruit tree productivity is generally low and highly variable in the tropics. Quantifying yield gaps and their determining factors provides levers to increase production, but yield gap of fruit trees remains poorly explored at the tree scale. In order to bridge this knowledge gap, we adapted the concept of yield gap to define the production gap at the tree scale to integrate tree endogenous factors (cultivar, age, and crown dimensions). The production gap (Pg) was defined as the difference between potential tree production (Pp) and actual tree production (Pa). The concept was implemented for mango trees in West Africa. We estimated these production indicators on 280 mango trees for two years, covering a wide range of fruit load, age, cultivars, and cropping systems (extensive, diversified, and intensive) found in Senegal. Actual production was estimated yearly using ground tree image analysis. Attainable production (Patt, a locally constrained approximation of Pp) was estimated based on tree endogenous and climatic factors using stochastic frontier analysis. Our results showed that attainable production increased with tree crown area and trunk diameter, whereas the effects of tree density, temperature, and solar radiation were cultivar-dependent. On average, the actual production reached 63% of the attainable production. The production gap was higher in extensive orchards (Pg = 58% of Patt) compared to diversified (Pg = 29% of Patt) and intensive (Pg = 32% of Patt) orchards. Based on production gap estimation, we identified the drivers of mango production variation among cultivars and cropping systems in West Africa. This study demonstrates the usefulness of adapting yield gap methodology to the tree scale to analyze production gaps in diverse fruit tree-based cropping systems. Measurement of production gaps allows the integration of tree features and their variability to upscale and improve the estimation of yield gaps at the orchard scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信