结合数据驱动和基于机制的方法用于早期药物发现阶段的人体肠道吸收预测

IF 6.2 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Koichi Handa, Sakae Sugiyama, Michiharu Kageyama and Takeshi Iijima
{"title":"结合数据驱动和基于机制的方法用于早期药物发现阶段的人体肠道吸收预测","authors":"Koichi Handa, Sakae Sugiyama, Michiharu Kageyama and Takeshi Iijima","doi":"10.1039/D3DD00144J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >It is important to precisely predict the intestinal absorption ratio (Fa) at an early stage in the discovery of orally available drugs because it directly influences drug efficacy. Gastrointestinal unified theoretical framework (GUTFW) and machine learning (ML) are commonly used to predict the percentage of Fa. In GUTFW, the Fa of a drug is estimated using an equation based on the mechanism of human intestinal absorption, dose, solubility, membrane permeability, and dissolution of the drug. The experimental values of these <em>in vitro</em> parameters are required to accurately predict Fa. However, most of these values are unavailable at early stages of development. ML uses a limited dataset of the observed Fa values of drugs in humans. In this study we combined GUTFW and ML to compensate for each defect. We collected published data on the chemical structures of 460 drugs, including Fa and dose amounts. The key parameters of the GUTFW (Do, dose number; Dn, dissolution number; Pn, permeation number), solubility, membrane permeability, and structural descriptors were calculated and used as explanatory variables for ML. ML algorithms, namely, the random forest (RF) and message-passing neural network (MPNN; Chemprop), were investigated. The GUTFW model was compared to the conventional ML method, which uses only structural descriptors, and combined ML method, which uses both structural descriptors and GUTFW parameters. In addition, using the Chemprop framework, we investigated important substructures of Fa. Our result suggested that combinational ML produced higher predictivity than the GUTFW model and conventional ML model in the test dataset (20% of the dataset) [<em>R</em><small><sup>2</sup></small> value and RMSE in the combinational ML method: 0.611 and 19.7 (RF), 0.520 and 21.6 (Chemprop); in conventional ML: 0.339 and 25.4 (RF), 0.497 and 22.1 (Chemprop); in GUTFW: 0.353 and 31.9]. Additionally, most of the substructures indicated by the Chemprop framework were consistent with the common knowledge of medicinal chemistry. We developed an accurate prediction method for human Fa using a combination of data-driven ML and mechanism-based GUTFW, where the parameters could be calculated without experimental data, enabling the model to efficiently promote early drug discovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":72816,"journal":{"name":"Digital discovery","volume":" 5","pages":" 1577-1588"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2023/dd/d3dd00144j?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined data-driven and mechanism-based approaches for human-intestinal-absorption prediction in the early drug-discovery stage†\",\"authors\":\"Koichi Handa, Sakae Sugiyama, Michiharu Kageyama and Takeshi Iijima\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D3DD00144J\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >It is important to precisely predict the intestinal absorption ratio (Fa) at an early stage in the discovery of orally available drugs because it directly influences drug efficacy. Gastrointestinal unified theoretical framework (GUTFW) and machine learning (ML) are commonly used to predict the percentage of Fa. In GUTFW, the Fa of a drug is estimated using an equation based on the mechanism of human intestinal absorption, dose, solubility, membrane permeability, and dissolution of the drug. The experimental values of these <em>in vitro</em> parameters are required to accurately predict Fa. However, most of these values are unavailable at early stages of development. ML uses a limited dataset of the observed Fa values of drugs in humans. In this study we combined GUTFW and ML to compensate for each defect. We collected published data on the chemical structures of 460 drugs, including Fa and dose amounts. The key parameters of the GUTFW (Do, dose number; Dn, dissolution number; Pn, permeation number), solubility, membrane permeability, and structural descriptors were calculated and used as explanatory variables for ML. ML algorithms, namely, the random forest (RF) and message-passing neural network (MPNN; Chemprop), were investigated. The GUTFW model was compared to the conventional ML method, which uses only structural descriptors, and combined ML method, which uses both structural descriptors and GUTFW parameters. In addition, using the Chemprop framework, we investigated important substructures of Fa. Our result suggested that combinational ML produced higher predictivity than the GUTFW model and conventional ML model in the test dataset (20% of the dataset) [<em>R</em><small><sup>2</sup></small> value and RMSE in the combinational ML method: 0.611 and 19.7 (RF), 0.520 and 21.6 (Chemprop); in conventional ML: 0.339 and 25.4 (RF), 0.497 and 22.1 (Chemprop); in GUTFW: 0.353 and 31.9]. Additionally, most of the substructures indicated by the Chemprop framework were consistent with the common knowledge of medicinal chemistry. We developed an accurate prediction method for human Fa using a combination of data-driven ML and mechanism-based GUTFW, where the parameters could be calculated without experimental data, enabling the model to efficiently promote early drug discovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital discovery\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\" 1577-1588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2023/dd/d3dd00144j?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/dd/d3dd00144j\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/dd/d3dd00144j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在发现口服药物的早期准确预测肠道吸收比(Fa)是非常重要的,因为它直接影响到药物的疗效。胃肠道统一理论框架(GUTFW)和机器学习(ML)是常用的预测Fa百分比的方法。在GUTFW中,利用基于人体肠道吸收机制、剂量、溶解度、膜透性和药物溶出度的方程来估计药物的Fa。为了准确预测Fa,需要这些体外参数的实验值。然而,大多数这些值在开发的早期阶段是不可用的。ML使用了一个有限的数据集,其中包含了观察到的药物在人体中的Fa值。在这项研究中,我们结合了GUTFW和ML来弥补每个缺陷。我们收集了460种药物的化学结构数据,包括Fa和剂量。GUTFW关键参数(Do,剂量数;Dn:溶解数;计算了Pn(渗透数)、溶解度、膜渗透率和结构描述符,并将其用作ML的解释变量。ML算法,即随机森林(RF)和消息传递神经网络(MPNN);Chemprop),进行了研究。将该模型与仅使用结构描述符的传统ML方法和同时使用结构描述符和GUTFW参数的组合ML方法进行了比较。此外,利用Chemprop框架,我们研究了Fa的重要子结构。我们的研究结果表明,在测试数据集中,组合ML比GUTFW模型和传统ML模型(占数据集的20%)具有更高的预测能力[组合ML方法的R2值和RMSE: 0.611和19.7 (RF), 0.520和21.6 (Chemprop);常规ML: 0.339和25.4 (RF), 0.497和22.1 (Chemprop);在GUTFW: 0.353和31.9]。此外,Chemprop框架显示的大部分亚结构与药物化学的常识一致。我们将数据驱动的ML和基于机制的GUTFW相结合,开发了一种准确的人类Fa预测方法,其中参数可以在没有实验数据的情况下计算,使模型能够有效地促进早期药物发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Combined data-driven and mechanism-based approaches for human-intestinal-absorption prediction in the early drug-discovery stage†

Combined data-driven and mechanism-based approaches for human-intestinal-absorption prediction in the early drug-discovery stage†

It is important to precisely predict the intestinal absorption ratio (Fa) at an early stage in the discovery of orally available drugs because it directly influences drug efficacy. Gastrointestinal unified theoretical framework (GUTFW) and machine learning (ML) are commonly used to predict the percentage of Fa. In GUTFW, the Fa of a drug is estimated using an equation based on the mechanism of human intestinal absorption, dose, solubility, membrane permeability, and dissolution of the drug. The experimental values of these in vitro parameters are required to accurately predict Fa. However, most of these values are unavailable at early stages of development. ML uses a limited dataset of the observed Fa values of drugs in humans. In this study we combined GUTFW and ML to compensate for each defect. We collected published data on the chemical structures of 460 drugs, including Fa and dose amounts. The key parameters of the GUTFW (Do, dose number; Dn, dissolution number; Pn, permeation number), solubility, membrane permeability, and structural descriptors were calculated and used as explanatory variables for ML. ML algorithms, namely, the random forest (RF) and message-passing neural network (MPNN; Chemprop), were investigated. The GUTFW model was compared to the conventional ML method, which uses only structural descriptors, and combined ML method, which uses both structural descriptors and GUTFW parameters. In addition, using the Chemprop framework, we investigated important substructures of Fa. Our result suggested that combinational ML produced higher predictivity than the GUTFW model and conventional ML model in the test dataset (20% of the dataset) [R2 value and RMSE in the combinational ML method: 0.611 and 19.7 (RF), 0.520 and 21.6 (Chemprop); in conventional ML: 0.339 and 25.4 (RF), 0.497 and 22.1 (Chemprop); in GUTFW: 0.353 and 31.9]. Additionally, most of the substructures indicated by the Chemprop framework were consistent with the common knowledge of medicinal chemistry. We developed an accurate prediction method for human Fa using a combination of data-driven ML and mechanism-based GUTFW, where the parameters could be calculated without experimental data, enabling the model to efficiently promote early drug discovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信