表面处理对CAD/CAM生物陶瓷和树脂块与正畸金属托槽剪切粘结强度的影响

IF 1.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 Materials Science
Rana Turunç-Oğuzman, Soner Şişmanoğlu
{"title":"表面处理对CAD/CAM生物陶瓷和树脂块与正畸金属托槽剪切粘结强度的影响","authors":"Rana Turunç-Oğuzman,&nbsp;Soner Şişmanoğlu","doi":"10.1007/s41779-022-00825-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This in vitro study aimed to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) between CAD/CAM blocks with different compositions and orthodontic metal brackets, following various surface treatments and bonding procedure. Specimens were prepared from Vita Enamic, CeraSmart, Tetric CAD and Vita Mark II CAD/CAM blocks and were subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles. Then, the specimens were allocated into 6 groups according to the surface treatment (<i>n</i> = 12): control (no surface treatment); hydrofluoric acid etching (HF); air-borne particle abrasion with aluminium-oxide; tribochemical silica coating; bur abrasion; and Monobond Etch and Prime application (MEP). The surface morphology of the CAD/CAM blocks was characterized using scanning electron microscope. Then, specimens were silanized and brackets were bonded with adhesive resin. After thermocycling, the SBS test was performed until failure, and failure types were noted according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests to perform pairwise analyses. The significance level was taken as <i>α</i> = 0.05. Both the CAD/CAM block type and the surface treatment significantly influenced SBS. Control groups of all CAD/CAM blocks demonstrated significantly the lowest SBS values. The highest SBS values were observed for Vita Mark II specimens treated with HF among all groups. Control groups showed exclusively ARI score 5, whereas surface treated groups had lower and similar scores. All groups, except the control, had reliable SBS values (above 6 MPa). Therefore, clinicians can use MEP, novel self-etching single-component ceramic primer, safely besides other surface treatments while bonding orthodontic brackets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","volume":"59 1","pages":"187 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41779-022-00825-z.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength between CAD/CAM bioceramic and resin blocks and orthodontic metal brackets bonded to each other\",\"authors\":\"Rana Turunç-Oğuzman,&nbsp;Soner Şişmanoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41779-022-00825-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This in vitro study aimed to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) between CAD/CAM blocks with different compositions and orthodontic metal brackets, following various surface treatments and bonding procedure. Specimens were prepared from Vita Enamic, CeraSmart, Tetric CAD and Vita Mark II CAD/CAM blocks and were subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles. Then, the specimens were allocated into 6 groups according to the surface treatment (<i>n</i> = 12): control (no surface treatment); hydrofluoric acid etching (HF); air-borne particle abrasion with aluminium-oxide; tribochemical silica coating; bur abrasion; and Monobond Etch and Prime application (MEP). The surface morphology of the CAD/CAM blocks was characterized using scanning electron microscope. Then, specimens were silanized and brackets were bonded with adhesive resin. After thermocycling, the SBS test was performed until failure, and failure types were noted according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests to perform pairwise analyses. The significance level was taken as <i>α</i> = 0.05. Both the CAD/CAM block type and the surface treatment significantly influenced SBS. Control groups of all CAD/CAM blocks demonstrated significantly the lowest SBS values. The highest SBS values were observed for Vita Mark II specimens treated with HF among all groups. Control groups showed exclusively ARI score 5, whereas surface treated groups had lower and similar scores. All groups, except the control, had reliable SBS values (above 6 MPa). Therefore, clinicians can use MEP, novel self-etching single-component ceramic primer, safely besides other surface treatments while bonding orthodontic brackets.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41779-022-00825-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-022-00825-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Materials Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-022-00825-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Materials Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本体外研究旨在评估不同成分的CAD/CAM块与正畸金属托槽在不同表面处理和粘接过程后的剪切粘接强度(SBS)。样品由Vita Enamic、CeraSmart、Tetric CAD和Vita Mark II CAD/CAM模块制备,并进行5000次热循环。然后,根据表面处理情况将标本分为6组(n = 12):对照组(未进行表面处理);氢氟酸蚀刻;氧化铝空气颗粒磨损;摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层;钻头磨损;以及Monobond蚀刻和Prime应用(MEP)。利用扫描电镜对CAD/CAM块体的表面形貌进行了表征。然后对试件进行硅烷化处理,并用胶粘树脂粘接支架。热循环后进行SBS试验,直至失效,并根据残余粘接指数(ARI)记录失效类型。数据分析采用双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行两两分析。显著性水平取α = 0.05。CAD/CAM块体类型和表面处理对SBS均有显著影响。所有CAD/CAM组的对照组SBS值均最低。在所有组中,经HF处理的Vita Mark II标本的SBS值最高。对照组的ARI评分为5分,而表面处理组的得分较低且相似。除对照组外,各组的SBS值均在6 MPa以上。因此,除了其他表面处理外,临床医生在粘合正畸托槽时可以安全地使用新型自蚀刻单组分陶瓷引物MEP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength between CAD/CAM bioceramic and resin blocks and orthodontic metal brackets bonded to each other

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) between CAD/CAM blocks with different compositions and orthodontic metal brackets, following various surface treatments and bonding procedure. Specimens were prepared from Vita Enamic, CeraSmart, Tetric CAD and Vita Mark II CAD/CAM blocks and were subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles. Then, the specimens were allocated into 6 groups according to the surface treatment (n = 12): control (no surface treatment); hydrofluoric acid etching (HF); air-borne particle abrasion with aluminium-oxide; tribochemical silica coating; bur abrasion; and Monobond Etch and Prime application (MEP). The surface morphology of the CAD/CAM blocks was characterized using scanning electron microscope. Then, specimens were silanized and brackets were bonded with adhesive resin. After thermocycling, the SBS test was performed until failure, and failure types were noted according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests to perform pairwise analyses. The significance level was taken as α = 0.05. Both the CAD/CAM block type and the surface treatment significantly influenced SBS. Control groups of all CAD/CAM blocks demonstrated significantly the lowest SBS values. The highest SBS values were observed for Vita Mark II specimens treated with HF among all groups. Control groups showed exclusively ARI score 5, whereas surface treated groups had lower and similar scores. All groups, except the control, had reliable SBS values (above 6 MPa). Therefore, clinicians can use MEP, novel self-etching single-component ceramic primer, safely besides other surface treatments while bonding orthodontic brackets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Publishes high quality research and technical papers in all areas of ceramic and related materials Spans the broad and growing fields of ceramic technology, material science and bioceramics Chronicles new advances in ceramic materials, manufacturing processes and applications Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society since 1965 Professional language editing service is available through our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service and American Journal Experts at the author''s cost and does not guarantee that the manuscript will be reviewed or accepted
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信