{"title":"评估复杂网络的节点嵌入","authors":"Arash Dehghan-Kooshkghazi;Bogumił Kamiński;Łukasz Kraiński;Paweł Prałat;François Théberge;Ali Pinar","doi":"10.1093/comnet/cnac030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graph embedding is a transformation of nodes of a graph into a set of vectors. A good embedding should capture the graph topology, node-to-node relationship and other relevant information about the graph, its subgraphs and nodes. If these objectives are achieved, an embedding is a meaningful, understandable, compressed representations of a network that can be used for other machine learning tools such as node classification, community detection or link prediction. In this article, we do a series of extensive experiments with selected graph embedding algorithms, both on real-world networks as well as artificially generated ones. Based on those experiments, we formulate the following general conclusions. First, we confirm the main problem of node embeddings that is rather well-known to practitioners but less documented in the literature. There exist many algorithms available to choose from which use different techniques and have various parameters that may be tuned, the dimension being one of them. One needs to ensure that embeddings describe the properties of the underlying graphs well but, as our experiments confirm, it highly depends on properties of the network at hand and the given application in mind. As a result, selecting the best embedding is a challenging task and very often requires domain experts. Since investigating embeddings in a supervised manner is computationally expensive, there is a need for an unsupervised tool that is able to select a handful of promising embeddings for future (supervised) investigation. A general framework, introduced recently in the literature and easily available on GitHub repository, provides one of the very first tools for an unsupervised graph embedding comparison by assigning the ‘divergence score’ to embeddings with a goal of distinguishing good from bad ones. We show that the divergence score strongly correlates with the quality of embeddings by investigating three main applications of node embeddings: node classification, community detection and link prediction.","PeriodicalId":15442,"journal":{"name":"Journal of complex networks","volume":"10 4","pages":"56001-1098"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating node embeddings of complex networks\",\"authors\":\"Arash Dehghan-Kooshkghazi;Bogumił Kamiński;Łukasz Kraiński;Paweł Prałat;François Théberge;Ali Pinar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/comnet/cnac030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Graph embedding is a transformation of nodes of a graph into a set of vectors. A good embedding should capture the graph topology, node-to-node relationship and other relevant information about the graph, its subgraphs and nodes. If these objectives are achieved, an embedding is a meaningful, understandable, compressed representations of a network that can be used for other machine learning tools such as node classification, community detection or link prediction. In this article, we do a series of extensive experiments with selected graph embedding algorithms, both on real-world networks as well as artificially generated ones. Based on those experiments, we formulate the following general conclusions. First, we confirm the main problem of node embeddings that is rather well-known to practitioners but less documented in the literature. There exist many algorithms available to choose from which use different techniques and have various parameters that may be tuned, the dimension being one of them. One needs to ensure that embeddings describe the properties of the underlying graphs well but, as our experiments confirm, it highly depends on properties of the network at hand and the given application in mind. As a result, selecting the best embedding is a challenging task and very often requires domain experts. Since investigating embeddings in a supervised manner is computationally expensive, there is a need for an unsupervised tool that is able to select a handful of promising embeddings for future (supervised) investigation. A general framework, introduced recently in the literature and easily available on GitHub repository, provides one of the very first tools for an unsupervised graph embedding comparison by assigning the ‘divergence score’ to embeddings with a goal of distinguishing good from bad ones. We show that the divergence score strongly correlates with the quality of embeddings by investigating three main applications of node embeddings: node classification, community detection and link prediction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of complex networks\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"56001-1098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of complex networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070454/\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of complex networks","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10070454/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Graph embedding is a transformation of nodes of a graph into a set of vectors. A good embedding should capture the graph topology, node-to-node relationship and other relevant information about the graph, its subgraphs and nodes. If these objectives are achieved, an embedding is a meaningful, understandable, compressed representations of a network that can be used for other machine learning tools such as node classification, community detection or link prediction. In this article, we do a series of extensive experiments with selected graph embedding algorithms, both on real-world networks as well as artificially generated ones. Based on those experiments, we formulate the following general conclusions. First, we confirm the main problem of node embeddings that is rather well-known to practitioners but less documented in the literature. There exist many algorithms available to choose from which use different techniques and have various parameters that may be tuned, the dimension being one of them. One needs to ensure that embeddings describe the properties of the underlying graphs well but, as our experiments confirm, it highly depends on properties of the network at hand and the given application in mind. As a result, selecting the best embedding is a challenging task and very often requires domain experts. Since investigating embeddings in a supervised manner is computationally expensive, there is a need for an unsupervised tool that is able to select a handful of promising embeddings for future (supervised) investigation. A general framework, introduced recently in the literature and easily available on GitHub repository, provides one of the very first tools for an unsupervised graph embedding comparison by assigning the ‘divergence score’ to embeddings with a goal of distinguishing good from bad ones. We show that the divergence score strongly correlates with the quality of embeddings by investigating three main applications of node embeddings: node classification, community detection and link prediction.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Complex Networks publishes original articles and reviews with a significant contribution to the analysis and understanding of complex networks and its applications in diverse fields. Complex networks are loosely defined as networks with nontrivial topology and dynamics, which appear as the skeletons of complex systems in the real-world. The journal covers everything from the basic mathematical, physical and computational principles needed for studying complex networks to their applications leading to predictive models in molecular, biological, ecological, informational, engineering, social, technological and other systems. It includes, but is not limited to, the following topics: - Mathematical and numerical analysis of networks - Network theory and computer sciences - Structural analysis of networks - Dynamics on networks - Physical models on networks - Networks and epidemiology - Social, socio-economic and political networks - Ecological networks - Technological and infrastructural networks - Brain and tissue networks - Biological and molecular networks - Spatial networks - Techno-social networks i.e. online social networks, social networking sites, social media - Other applications of networks - Evolving networks - Multilayer networks - Game theory on networks - Biomedicine related networks - Animal social networks - Climate networks - Cognitive, language and informational network