基于最大可接受风险的自动驾驶车辆轨迹规划决策准则

IF 4.6 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Maximilian Geisslinger;Rainer Trauth;Gemb Kaljavesi;Markus Lienkamp
{"title":"基于最大可接受风险的自动驾驶车辆轨迹规划决策准则","authors":"Maximilian Geisslinger;Rainer Trauth;Gemb Kaljavesi;Markus Lienkamp","doi":"10.1109/OJITS.2023.3298973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous vehicles are being developed to make road traffic safer in the future. The time when autonomous vehicles are actually safe enough to be used in real traffic is a current subject of discussion between industry, science, and society. In our work, we propose a new approach to the risk assessment of autonomous vehicles based on risk-benefit analysis, as it is already established in other areas, such as the registration of pharmaceuticals. In this context, we address the question of socially acceptable risk for mobility and investigate this concept as a decision-making criterion in trajectory planning. We make the first attempt to quantify an accepted risk by comparing autonomous vehicles with other types of mobility while taking into account the ethical and psychological effects important to the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. We show how an accepted risk contributes to the transparent decision-making of autonomous vehicles at the maneuver level. Finally, we present a method for considering accepted risk in trajectory planning. The evaluation of this algorithm in a simulation of 2,000 scenarios reveals that lower risk thresholds can actually reduce risks in trajectory planning. The code used in this research is publicly available as open-source software: \n<uri>https://github.com/TUMFTM/EthicalTrajectoryPlanning</uri>\n.","PeriodicalId":100631,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"4 ","pages":"570-579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8784355/9999144/10195149.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximum Acceptable Risk as Criterion for Decision-Making in Autonomous Vehicle Trajectory Planning\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian Geisslinger;Rainer Trauth;Gemb Kaljavesi;Markus Lienkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJITS.2023.3298973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Autonomous vehicles are being developed to make road traffic safer in the future. The time when autonomous vehicles are actually safe enough to be used in real traffic is a current subject of discussion between industry, science, and society. In our work, we propose a new approach to the risk assessment of autonomous vehicles based on risk-benefit analysis, as it is already established in other areas, such as the registration of pharmaceuticals. In this context, we address the question of socially acceptable risk for mobility and investigate this concept as a decision-making criterion in trajectory planning. We make the first attempt to quantify an accepted risk by comparing autonomous vehicles with other types of mobility while taking into account the ethical and psychological effects important to the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. We show how an accepted risk contributes to the transparent decision-making of autonomous vehicles at the maneuver level. Finally, we present a method for considering accepted risk in trajectory planning. The evaluation of this algorithm in a simulation of 2,000 scenarios reveals that lower risk thresholds can actually reduce risks in trajectory planning. The code used in this research is publicly available as open-source software: \\n<uri>https://github.com/TUMFTM/EthicalTrajectoryPlanning</uri>\\n.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"570-579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/8784355/9999144/10195149.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10195149/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10195149/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研发自动驾驶汽车是为了让未来的道路交通更加安全。自动驾驶汽车真正安全到可以在实际交通中使用的时间,是工业界、科学界和社会之间当前讨论的话题。在我们的工作中,我们提出了一种基于风险-收益分析的自动驾驶汽车风险评估的新方法,因为它已经在其他领域建立起来,例如药品注册。在这种情况下,我们解决了社会可接受的流动性风险问题,并研究了这一概念作为轨迹规划的决策标准。我们首次尝试通过将自动驾驶汽车与其他类型的移动性进行比较来量化可接受的风险,同时考虑到对接受自动驾驶汽车很重要的道德和心理影响。我们展示了可接受的风险如何有助于自动驾驶车辆在机动层面上的透明决策。最后,提出了一种考虑可接受风险的轨迹规划方法。在2000个场景的仿真中对该算法的评估表明,降低风险阈值实际上可以降低轨迹规划中的风险。本研究中使用的代码是公开的开源软件:https://github.com/TUMFTM/EthicalTrajectoryPlanning。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maximum Acceptable Risk as Criterion for Decision-Making in Autonomous Vehicle Trajectory Planning
Autonomous vehicles are being developed to make road traffic safer in the future. The time when autonomous vehicles are actually safe enough to be used in real traffic is a current subject of discussion between industry, science, and society. In our work, we propose a new approach to the risk assessment of autonomous vehicles based on risk-benefit analysis, as it is already established in other areas, such as the registration of pharmaceuticals. In this context, we address the question of socially acceptable risk for mobility and investigate this concept as a decision-making criterion in trajectory planning. We make the first attempt to quantify an accepted risk by comparing autonomous vehicles with other types of mobility while taking into account the ethical and psychological effects important to the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. We show how an accepted risk contributes to the transparent decision-making of autonomous vehicles at the maneuver level. Finally, we present a method for considering accepted risk in trajectory planning. The evaluation of this algorithm in a simulation of 2,000 scenarios reveals that lower risk thresholds can actually reduce risks in trajectory planning. The code used in this research is publicly available as open-source software: https://github.com/TUMFTM/EthicalTrajectoryPlanning .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信