{"title":"测试小样本的更高和无限程度的随机优势:贝叶斯方法","authors":"Mariusz Górajski","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2023.106102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This study proposes a distribution-free Bayesian procedure that detects infinite degrees of stochastic dominance (SD</span><span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span>) between two random outcomes and then seeks a finite degree <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></math></span> of stochastic dominance (SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span><span>). Based on small samples, we construct four-choice Bayesian tests by combining an encompassing prior Bayesian model with the Dirichlet process priors that discriminate between SD</span><span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> and SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> of one random variable over the other with non-dominance or equality between them. We use Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the novel Bayesian tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> and SD<span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> and compare them to the subsampling and bootstrap significance tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span>. Our simulation shows that the Bayesian tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> outperform the significance tests for small samples, especially for detecting non-stochastic dominance. This study shows that the test for SD<span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> is an accurate decision-making tool when using small samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing higher and infinite degrees of stochastic dominance for small samples: A Bayesian approach\",\"authors\":\"Mariusz Górajski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jspi.2023.106102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>This study proposes a distribution-free Bayesian procedure that detects infinite degrees of stochastic dominance (SD</span><span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span>) between two random outcomes and then seeks a finite degree <span><math><mrow><mi>k</mi><mo>≥</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></math></span> of stochastic dominance (SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span><span>). Based on small samples, we construct four-choice Bayesian tests by combining an encompassing prior Bayesian model with the Dirichlet process priors that discriminate between SD</span><span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> and SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> of one random variable over the other with non-dominance or equality between them. We use Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the novel Bayesian tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> and SD<span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> and compare them to the subsampling and bootstrap significance tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span>. Our simulation shows that the Bayesian tests for SD<span><math><mi>k</mi></math></span> outperform the significance tests for small samples, especially for detecting non-stochastic dominance. This study shows that the test for SD<span><math><mi>∞</mi></math></span> is an accurate decision-making tool when using small samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837582300071X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837582300071X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing higher and infinite degrees of stochastic dominance for small samples: A Bayesian approach
This study proposes a distribution-free Bayesian procedure that detects infinite degrees of stochastic dominance (SD) between two random outcomes and then seeks a finite degree of stochastic dominance (SD). Based on small samples, we construct four-choice Bayesian tests by combining an encompassing prior Bayesian model with the Dirichlet process priors that discriminate between SD and SD of one random variable over the other with non-dominance or equality between them. We use Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the novel Bayesian tests for SD and SD and compare them to the subsampling and bootstrap significance tests for SD. Our simulation shows that the Bayesian tests for SD outperform the significance tests for small samples, especially for detecting non-stochastic dominance. This study shows that the test for SD is an accurate decision-making tool when using small samples.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference offers itself as a multifaceted and all-inclusive bridge between classical aspects of statistics and probability, and the emerging interdisciplinary aspects that have a potential of revolutionizing the subject. While we maintain our traditional strength in statistical inference, design, classical probability, and large sample methods, we also have a far more inclusive and broadened scope to keep up with the new problems that confront us as statisticians, mathematicians, and scientists.
We publish high quality articles in all branches of statistics, probability, discrete mathematics, machine learning, and bioinformatics. We also especially welcome well written and up to date review articles on fundamental themes of statistics, probability, machine learning, and general biostatistics. Thoughtful letters to the editors, interesting problems in need of a solution, and short notes carrying an element of elegance or beauty are equally welcome.