刻意练习提高跨学科交流:一项初步研究

Q3 Social Sciences
Veronica Godsey , Stacy Gaither , Nancy M. Tofil , Carrie Norwood , J. Lynn Zinkan , AKM Fazlur Rahman , Inmaculada Aban , Chrystal Rutledge
{"title":"刻意练习提高跨学科交流:一项初步研究","authors":"Veronica Godsey ,&nbsp;Stacy Gaither ,&nbsp;Nancy M. Tofil ,&nbsp;Carrie Norwood ,&nbsp;J. Lynn Zinkan ,&nbsp;AKM Fazlur Rahman ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Aban ,&nbsp;Chrystal Rutledge","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Good communication is vital in providing optimal medical care. We developed a simulation-based communication-training program for healthcare providers using methodologies of <em>Verbal Judo.</em></p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of improving resident communication with nurses by teaching <em>Verbal Judo</em> communication tactics using deliberate practice (intervention) versus traditional debriefing (control).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Thirty-five residents were randomized into control or intervention groups. Communication skills were evaluated using self-assessment, real-life assessment by nurses, and video-observed graded assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The nurse assessments found improvement in both groups from baseline to 6-month follow-up. There was improvement in self-assessments in both groups but only the intervention group reached statistical significance. There was no significant difference in blinded assessments. There was no difference in scores between the 3 time points. Participants scored themselves lower than the observer.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study found an improvement in communication over time but was unable to find a difference between teaching with deliberate practice or traditional debriefing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deliberate practice to improve interdisciplinary communication: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Godsey ,&nbsp;Stacy Gaither ,&nbsp;Nancy M. Tofil ,&nbsp;Carrie Norwood ,&nbsp;J. Lynn Zinkan ,&nbsp;AKM Fazlur Rahman ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Aban ,&nbsp;Chrystal Rutledge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjep.2023.100657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Good communication is vital in providing optimal medical care. We developed a simulation-based communication-training program for healthcare providers using methodologies of <em>Verbal Judo.</em></p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the effectiveness of improving resident communication with nurses by teaching <em>Verbal Judo</em> communication tactics using deliberate practice (intervention) versus traditional debriefing (control).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Thirty-five residents were randomized into control or intervention groups. Communication skills were evaluated using self-assessment, real-life assessment by nurses, and video-observed graded assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The nurse assessments found improvement in both groups from baseline to 6-month follow-up. There was improvement in self-assessments in both groups but only the intervention group reached statistical significance. There was no significant difference in blinded assessments. There was no difference in scores between the 3 time points. Participants scored themselves lower than the observer.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study found an improvement in communication over time but was unable to find a difference between teaching with deliberate practice or traditional debriefing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452623000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景良好的沟通对于提供最佳医疗护理至关重要。我们使用口头柔道的方法为医疗保健提供者开发了一个基于模拟的沟通培训计划。目的通过使用刻意练习(干预)和传统汇报(对照)教授口头柔道沟通策略来评估改善住院医师与护士沟通的有效性干预组。使用自我评估、护士的真实评估和视频观察分级评估来评估沟通技能。讨论护士评估发现,从基线到6个月的随访,两组的情况都有所改善。两组的自我评估都有所改善,但只有干预组达到统计学显著性。盲法评估没有显著差异。三个时间点之间的得分没有差异。参与者的得分低于观察者。结论我们的研究发现,随着时间的推移,沟通能力有所改善,但无法发现刻意练习教学和传统汇报教学之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deliberate practice to improve interdisciplinary communication: A pilot study

Background

Good communication is vital in providing optimal medical care. We developed a simulation-based communication-training program for healthcare providers using methodologies of Verbal Judo.

Purpose

To evaluate the effectiveness of improving resident communication with nurses by teaching Verbal Judo communication tactics using deliberate practice (intervention) versus traditional debriefing (control).

Method

Thirty-five residents were randomized into control or intervention groups. Communication skills were evaluated using self-assessment, real-life assessment by nurses, and video-observed graded assessment.

Discussion

The nurse assessments found improvement in both groups from baseline to 6-month follow-up. There was improvement in self-assessments in both groups but only the intervention group reached statistical significance. There was no significant difference in blinded assessments. There was no difference in scores between the 3 time points. Participants scored themselves lower than the observer.

Conclusions

Our study found an improvement in communication over time but was unable to find a difference between teaching with deliberate practice or traditional debriefing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信