同步确定性下推自动机真的很难

IF 0.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Henning Fernau , Petra Wolf , Tomoyuki Yamakami
{"title":"同步确定性下推自动机真的很难","authors":"Henning Fernau ,&nbsp;Petra Wolf ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Yamakami","doi":"10.1016/j.ic.2023.105089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The question if a deterministic finite automaton<span> admits a software reset in the form of a so-called synchronizing word can be answered in polynomial time<span>. In this paper, we extend this algorithmic question to deterministic automata beyond </span></span></span>finite automata<span>. We prove that the question of synchronizability becomes undecidable even when looking at deterministic one-counter automata. This is also true for another classical mild extension of regularity, namely, that of deterministic one-turn push-down automata. However, when we combine both restrictions, we arrive at scenarios with a </span></span><span>PSPACE</span>-complete (and hence decidable) synchronizability problem. Likewise, we arrive at a decidable synchronizability problem for (partially) blind deterministic counter automata.</p><p>There are several interpretations of what <em>synchronizability</em><span> should mean for deterministic push-down automata. This is depending on the role of the stack: should it be empty on synchronization, should it be always the same or is it arbitrary? For the automata classes studied in this paper, the complexity or decidability status of the synchronizability problem is mostly independent of this technicality, but we also discuss one class of automata where this makes a difference.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54985,"journal":{"name":"Information and Computation","volume":"295 ","pages":"Article 105089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synchronizing deterministic push-down automata can be really hard\",\"authors\":\"Henning Fernau ,&nbsp;Petra Wolf ,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Yamakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ic.2023.105089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The question if a deterministic finite automaton<span> admits a software reset in the form of a so-called synchronizing word can be answered in polynomial time<span>. In this paper, we extend this algorithmic question to deterministic automata beyond </span></span></span>finite automata<span>. We prove that the question of synchronizability becomes undecidable even when looking at deterministic one-counter automata. This is also true for another classical mild extension of regularity, namely, that of deterministic one-turn push-down automata. However, when we combine both restrictions, we arrive at scenarios with a </span></span><span>PSPACE</span>-complete (and hence decidable) synchronizability problem. Likewise, we arrive at a decidable synchronizability problem for (partially) blind deterministic counter automata.</p><p>There are several interpretations of what <em>synchronizability</em><span> should mean for deterministic push-down automata. This is depending on the role of the stack: should it be empty on synchronization, should it be always the same or is it arbitrary? For the automata classes studied in this paper, the complexity or decidability status of the synchronizability problem is mostly independent of this technicality, but we also discuss one class of automata where this makes a difference.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Computation\",\"volume\":\"295 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540123000925\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540123000925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定性有限自动机是否允许以所谓同步字的形式进行软件重置的问题可以在多项式时间内回答。在本文中,我们将这个算法问题推广到有限自动机以外的确定性自动机。我们证明了同步性的问题即使在考虑确定性单计数器自动机时也变得不可判定。对于正则性的另一种经典温和扩展,即确定性单转下推自动机,也是如此。然而,当我们结合这两个限制时,我们会遇到pspace完全(因此是可确定的)同步性问题。同样,我们也得到了(部分)盲确定性反自动机的可决定同步性问题。对于确定性下推自动机的同步性应该意味着什么,有几种解释。这取决于堆栈的角色:它应该在同步时为空,应该始终相同还是任意的?对于本文所研究的自动机类,同步性问题的复杂性或可判定状态大多与这种技术无关,但我们也讨论了一类自动机,其中这种技术会产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synchronizing deterministic push-down automata can be really hard

The question if a deterministic finite automaton admits a software reset in the form of a so-called synchronizing word can be answered in polynomial time. In this paper, we extend this algorithmic question to deterministic automata beyond finite automata. We prove that the question of synchronizability becomes undecidable even when looking at deterministic one-counter automata. This is also true for another classical mild extension of regularity, namely, that of deterministic one-turn push-down automata. However, when we combine both restrictions, we arrive at scenarios with a PSPACE-complete (and hence decidable) synchronizability problem. Likewise, we arrive at a decidable synchronizability problem for (partially) blind deterministic counter automata.

There are several interpretations of what synchronizability should mean for deterministic push-down automata. This is depending on the role of the stack: should it be empty on synchronization, should it be always the same or is it arbitrary? For the automata classes studied in this paper, the complexity or decidability status of the synchronizability problem is mostly independent of this technicality, but we also discuss one class of automata where this makes a difference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Computation
Information and Computation 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
审稿时长
140 days
期刊介绍: Information and Computation welcomes original papers in all areas of theoretical computer science and computational applications of information theory. Survey articles of exceptional quality will also be considered. Particularly welcome are papers contributing new results in active theoretical areas such as -Biological computation and computational biology- Computational complexity- Computer theorem-proving- Concurrency and distributed process theory- Cryptographic theory- Data base theory- Decision problems in logic- Design and analysis of algorithms- Discrete optimization and mathematical programming- Inductive inference and learning theory- Logic & constraint programming- Program verification & model checking- Probabilistic & Quantum computation- Semantics of programming languages- Symbolic computation, lambda calculus, and rewriting systems- Types and typechecking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信