超越恐惧和愤怒:推特上对Covid-19新闻的情绪反应的全球分析

Q1 Social Sciences
Francisco Bráulio Oliveira , Davoud Mougouei , Amanul Haque , Jaime Simão Sichman , Hoa Khanh Dam , Simon Evans , Aditya Ghose , Munindar P. Singh
{"title":"超越恐惧和愤怒:推特上对Covid-19新闻的情绪反应的全球分析","authors":"Francisco Bráulio Oliveira ,&nbsp;Davoud Mougouei ,&nbsp;Amanul Haque ,&nbsp;Jaime Simão Sichman ,&nbsp;Hoa Khanh Dam ,&nbsp;Simon Evans ,&nbsp;Aditya Ghose ,&nbsp;Munindar P. Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The media has been used to disseminate public information amid the Covid-19 pandemic. However, Covid-19 news has triggered emotional responses in people that have impacted their mental well-being and led to news avoidance. To understand the emotional response to Covid-19 news, we studied user comments on news published on Twitter by 37 media outlets in 11 countries from January 2020 to December 2022. We employed a deep-learning-based model to identify the basic human emotions defined by Ekman in comments related to Covid-19 news. Additionally, we implemented Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to identify the news topics. Our analysis found that while nearly half of the user comments showed no significant emotions, negative emotions were more common. Anger was the most prevalent emotion, particularly in the media and comments regarding political responses and governmental actions in the United States. On the other hand, joy was mainly linked to media outlets from the Philippines and news about vaccination. Over time, anger consistently remained the most prevalent emotion, with fear being most prevalent at the start of the pandemic but decreasing over time, occasionally spiking with news on Covid-19 variants, cases, and deaths. Emotions also varied across media outlets, with Fox News being associated with the highest level of disgust, the second-highest level of anger, and the lowest level of fear. Sadness was highest at Citizen TV, SABC, and Nation Africa, all three African media outlets. Additionally, fear was most evident in the comments on news from The Times of India.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond fear and anger: A global analysis of emotional response to Covid-19 news on Twitter\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Bráulio Oliveira ,&nbsp;Davoud Mougouei ,&nbsp;Amanul Haque ,&nbsp;Jaime Simão Sichman ,&nbsp;Hoa Khanh Dam ,&nbsp;Simon Evans ,&nbsp;Aditya Ghose ,&nbsp;Munindar P. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The media has been used to disseminate public information amid the Covid-19 pandemic. However, Covid-19 news has triggered emotional responses in people that have impacted their mental well-being and led to news avoidance. To understand the emotional response to Covid-19 news, we studied user comments on news published on Twitter by 37 media outlets in 11 countries from January 2020 to December 2022. We employed a deep-learning-based model to identify the basic human emotions defined by Ekman in comments related to Covid-19 news. Additionally, we implemented Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to identify the news topics. Our analysis found that while nearly half of the user comments showed no significant emotions, negative emotions were more common. Anger was the most prevalent emotion, particularly in the media and comments regarding political responses and governmental actions in the United States. On the other hand, joy was mainly linked to media outlets from the Philippines and news about vaccination. Over time, anger consistently remained the most prevalent emotion, with fear being most prevalent at the start of the pandemic but decreasing over time, occasionally spiking with news on Covid-19 variants, cases, and deaths. Emotions also varied across media outlets, with Fox News being associated with the highest level of disgust, the second-highest level of anger, and the lowest level of fear. Sadness was highest at Citizen TV, SABC, and Nation Africa, all three African media outlets. Additionally, fear was most evident in the comments on news from The Times of India.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Online Social Networks and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在新冠肺炎大流行期间,媒体被用来传播公共信息。然而,新冠肺炎新闻在人们中引发了情绪反应,影响了他们的心理健康,并导致新闻回避。为了了解人们对新冠肺炎新闻的情绪反应,我们研究了2020年1月至2022年12月11个国家37家媒体在推特上发布的新闻的用户评论。我们采用了一个基于深度学习的模型来识别Ekman在与新冠肺炎新闻相关的评论中定义的人类基本情绪。此外,我们还实现了潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA)来识别新闻主题。我们的分析发现,虽然近一半的用户评论没有表现出明显的情绪,但负面情绪更为常见。愤怒是最普遍的情绪,尤其是在媒体和对美国政治反应和政府行动的评论中。另一方面,喜悦主要与菲律宾媒体和有关疫苗接种的新闻有关。随着时间的推移,愤怒始终是最普遍的情绪,恐惧在大流行开始时最为普遍,但随着时间的流逝而减少,偶尔会随着新冠肺炎变种、病例和死亡的消息而激增。各媒体的情绪也各不相同,福克斯新闻的厌恶程度最高,愤怒程度第二,恐惧程度最低。悲伤情绪在公民电视台、南非广播公司和非洲国家三家非洲媒体中最高。此外,恐惧在《印度时报》对新闻的评论中表现得最为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beyond fear and anger: A global analysis of emotional response to Covid-19 news on Twitter

Beyond fear and anger: A global analysis of emotional response to Covid-19 news on Twitter

The media has been used to disseminate public information amid the Covid-19 pandemic. However, Covid-19 news has triggered emotional responses in people that have impacted their mental well-being and led to news avoidance. To understand the emotional response to Covid-19 news, we studied user comments on news published on Twitter by 37 media outlets in 11 countries from January 2020 to December 2022. We employed a deep-learning-based model to identify the basic human emotions defined by Ekman in comments related to Covid-19 news. Additionally, we implemented Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to identify the news topics. Our analysis found that while nearly half of the user comments showed no significant emotions, negative emotions were more common. Anger was the most prevalent emotion, particularly in the media and comments regarding political responses and governmental actions in the United States. On the other hand, joy was mainly linked to media outlets from the Philippines and news about vaccination. Over time, anger consistently remained the most prevalent emotion, with fear being most prevalent at the start of the pandemic but decreasing over time, occasionally spiking with news on Covid-19 variants, cases, and deaths. Emotions also varied across media outlets, with Fox News being associated with the highest level of disgust, the second-highest level of anger, and the lowest level of fear. Sadness was highest at Citizen TV, SABC, and Nation Africa, all three African media outlets. Additionally, fear was most evident in the comments on news from The Times of India.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信