重力潮汐记录中压力波的影响

IF 2.8 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Bernard Ducarme
{"title":"重力潮汐记录中压力波的影响","authors":"Bernard Ducarme","doi":"10.1016/j.geog.2022.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For the reduction of atmospheric effects, observed gravity has initially been corrected by using the computed barometric admittance <em>k</em> of the in situ measured pressure, expressed in nms<sup>−2</sup>/hPa units and estimated by least squares method. However, the local pressure changes alone cannot account for the atmospheric mass attraction and loading when the coherent pressure field exceeds a specific size, i.e., with increasing periodicities. To overcome this difficulty, it is necessary to compute the total atmospheric effect at each station using the global pressure field. However, the direct subtraction of the total gravity effect, provided by the models of pressure correction, is not yet satisfactory for <strong><em>S</em></strong>2 and other tidal components, such as <strong><em>K</em></strong>2 and <strong><em>P</em></strong>1, which include solar heating pressure tides. This paper identifies the origin of the problem and presents strategies to obtain a satisfactory solution.</p><p>First, we set up a difference vector between the tidal factors of <strong><em>M</em></strong>2 and <strong><em>S</em></strong>2 after correction of the pressure and ocean tides effects. This vector, hereafter denoted as RES<strong>,</strong> presents the advantage of being practically insensitive to calibration errors. The minimum discrepancy between the tidal parameters of <strong><em>M</em></strong>2 and <strong><em>S</em></strong>2 corresponds to the minimum of the RES vector norm d.</p><p>Secondly we adopt the hybrid pressure correction method, separating the local and the global pressure contribution of the models and replacing the local contribution by the pressure measured at the station multiplied by an admittance <em>k</em><sub>ATM</sub>.</p><p>We tested this procedure on 8 stations from the IGETS superconducting gravimeters network (former GGP network). For stations at an altitude lower than 1000 m, the value of <em>d</em><sub>opt</sub> is always smaller than 0.0005. The discrepancy between the tidal parameters of the <strong><em>M</em></strong>2 and <strong><em>S</em></strong>2 waves is always lower than 0.05% on the amplitude factors and 0.025° on the phases. For these stations, a correlation exists between the altitude and the value <em>k</em><sub>opt</sub>. The results at the three Central European stations Conrad, Pecny and Vienna are in excellent agreement (0.05%) with the DDW99NH model for all the main tidal waves.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46398,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and Geodynamics","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 15-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of pressure waves in tidal gravity records\",\"authors\":\"Bernard Ducarme\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geog.2022.07.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>For the reduction of atmospheric effects, observed gravity has initially been corrected by using the computed barometric admittance <em>k</em> of the in situ measured pressure, expressed in nms<sup>−2</sup>/hPa units and estimated by least squares method. However, the local pressure changes alone cannot account for the atmospheric mass attraction and loading when the coherent pressure field exceeds a specific size, i.e., with increasing periodicities. To overcome this difficulty, it is necessary to compute the total atmospheric effect at each station using the global pressure field. However, the direct subtraction of the total gravity effect, provided by the models of pressure correction, is not yet satisfactory for <strong><em>S</em></strong>2 and other tidal components, such as <strong><em>K</em></strong>2 and <strong><em>P</em></strong>1, which include solar heating pressure tides. This paper identifies the origin of the problem and presents strategies to obtain a satisfactory solution.</p><p>First, we set up a difference vector between the tidal factors of <strong><em>M</em></strong>2 and <strong><em>S</em></strong>2 after correction of the pressure and ocean tides effects. This vector, hereafter denoted as RES<strong>,</strong> presents the advantage of being practically insensitive to calibration errors. The minimum discrepancy between the tidal parameters of <strong><em>M</em></strong>2 and <strong><em>S</em></strong>2 corresponds to the minimum of the RES vector norm d.</p><p>Secondly we adopt the hybrid pressure correction method, separating the local and the global pressure contribution of the models and replacing the local contribution by the pressure measured at the station multiplied by an admittance <em>k</em><sub>ATM</sub>.</p><p>We tested this procedure on 8 stations from the IGETS superconducting gravimeters network (former GGP network). For stations at an altitude lower than 1000 m, the value of <em>d</em><sub>opt</sub> is always smaller than 0.0005. The discrepancy between the tidal parameters of the <strong><em>M</em></strong>2 and <strong><em>S</em></strong>2 waves is always lower than 0.05% on the amplitude factors and 0.025° on the phases. For these stations, a correlation exists between the altitude and the value <em>k</em><sub>opt</sub>. The results at the three Central European stations Conrad, Pecny and Vienna are in excellent agreement (0.05%) with the DDW99NH model for all the main tidal waves.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geodesy and Geodynamics\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geodesy and Geodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984722000738\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and Geodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984722000738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

为了减少大气效应,观测到的重力最初已通过使用原位测量压力的计算气压导纳k进行校正,以nms−2/hPa单位表示,并通过最小二乘法估计。然而,当相干压力场超过一定尺寸时,即周期性增加时,仅局部压力变化不能解释大气质量的吸引和载荷。为了克服这一困难,有必要利用全球压力场计算每个站的总大气效应。然而,对于S2和其他潮汐分量,如K2和P1,其中包括太阳加热压力潮,压力校正模型提供的直接减去总重力效应还不能令人满意。本文指出了问题的根源,并提出了获得满意解决方案的策略。首先,对压力和海潮效应进行校正后,建立M2和S2潮汐因子差向量。该矢量(以下记为RES)具有对校准误差不敏感的优点。M2和S2潮汐参数差值的最小值对应于RES矢量范数d的最小值。其次,采用混合压力校正方法,分离模型的局部和全局压力贡献,用站内实测压力乘以导纳kATM代替局部压力贡献。我们在IGETS超导重力仪网络(原GGP网络)的8个台站上测试了该程序。对于海拔低于1000m的台站,采用的值始终小于0.0005。M2波和S2波的潮汐参数在振幅因子上的差异小于0.05%,在相位上的差异小于0.025°。对于这些台站,海拔高度与kopt值之间存在相关性。在康拉德、佩尼和维也纳三个中欧台站的结果与DDW99NH模型对所有主要潮汐波的预测结果非常吻合(0.05%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of pressure waves in tidal gravity records

For the reduction of atmospheric effects, observed gravity has initially been corrected by using the computed barometric admittance k of the in situ measured pressure, expressed in nms−2/hPa units and estimated by least squares method. However, the local pressure changes alone cannot account for the atmospheric mass attraction and loading when the coherent pressure field exceeds a specific size, i.e., with increasing periodicities. To overcome this difficulty, it is necessary to compute the total atmospheric effect at each station using the global pressure field. However, the direct subtraction of the total gravity effect, provided by the models of pressure correction, is not yet satisfactory for S2 and other tidal components, such as K2 and P1, which include solar heating pressure tides. This paper identifies the origin of the problem and presents strategies to obtain a satisfactory solution.

First, we set up a difference vector between the tidal factors of M2 and S2 after correction of the pressure and ocean tides effects. This vector, hereafter denoted as RES, presents the advantage of being practically insensitive to calibration errors. The minimum discrepancy between the tidal parameters of M2 and S2 corresponds to the minimum of the RES vector norm d.

Secondly we adopt the hybrid pressure correction method, separating the local and the global pressure contribution of the models and replacing the local contribution by the pressure measured at the station multiplied by an admittance kATM.

We tested this procedure on 8 stations from the IGETS superconducting gravimeters network (former GGP network). For stations at an altitude lower than 1000 m, the value of dopt is always smaller than 0.0005. The discrepancy between the tidal parameters of the M2 and S2 waves is always lower than 0.05% on the amplitude factors and 0.025° on the phases. For these stations, a correlation exists between the altitude and the value kopt. The results at the three Central European stations Conrad, Pecny and Vienna are in excellent agreement (0.05%) with the DDW99NH model for all the main tidal waves.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Geodesy and Geodynamics GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
566
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Geodesy and Geodynamics launched in October, 2010, and is a bimonthly publication. It is sponsored jointly by Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Science Press, and another six agencies. It is an international journal with a Chinese heart. Geodesy and Geodynamics is committed to the publication of quality scientific papers in English in the fields of geodesy and geodynamics from authors around the world. Its aim is to promote a combination between Geodesy and Geodynamics, deepen the application of Geodesy in the field of Geoscience and quicken worldwide fellows'' understanding on scientific research activity in China. It mainly publishes newest research achievements in the field of Geodesy, Geodynamics, Science of Disaster and so on. Aims and Scope: new theories and methods of geodesy; new results of monitoring and studying crustal movement and deformation by using geodetic theories and methods; new ways and achievements in earthquake-prediction investigation by using geodetic theories and methods; new results of crustal movement and deformation studies by using other geologic, hydrological, and geophysical theories and methods; new results of satellite gravity measurements; new development and results of space-to-ground observation technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信