零价铁耦合砂过滤器中砷的去除

Daniel Edward , Petro Karungamye , Grite Nelson , Juma Selemani , Karoli N. Njau
{"title":"零价铁耦合砂过滤器中砷的去除","authors":"Daniel Edward ,&nbsp;Petro Karungamye ,&nbsp;Grite Nelson ,&nbsp;Juma Selemani ,&nbsp;Karoli N. Njau","doi":"10.1016/j.hydres.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Arsenic (As) in wastewater has negative effects on the environment and human health, hence As containing wastes must be handled properly. Given the accessibility of metallic iron, studies investigating into the potential application of zerovalent iron in the removal of arsenic are promising. In this study, the performance of sand filter blended with several kinds of zero valent iron (Fe<sup>0</sup>), such as iron wool, iron fillings, and iron nails, were compared. These materials were combined in a sand filter column, and the efficiency was calculated using the As concentrations in the influent and effluent samples. Experiments were carried out in order to compare performance as a function of Fe<sup>0</sup> dose and contact time. The outcome of this investigation showed that sand filter containing iron wool had a better removal efficiency of arsenic removal than iron filings and iron nails. The results in all columns showed that as dosage was increased, removal efficiency of arsenic increased significantly. In case of contact time the results revealed that arsenic can effectively be removed from water in the first 48 h. The early adsorption response is quick in all columns, but get slower as time goes on. The highest removal efficiency was 99.6% and the lowest removal efficiency was 82.7%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100615,"journal":{"name":"HydroResearch","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 228-234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of arsenic in a sand filter coupled with zero valent iron\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Edward ,&nbsp;Petro Karungamye ,&nbsp;Grite Nelson ,&nbsp;Juma Selemani ,&nbsp;Karoli N. Njau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hydres.2023.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Arsenic (As) in wastewater has negative effects on the environment and human health, hence As containing wastes must be handled properly. Given the accessibility of metallic iron, studies investigating into the potential application of zerovalent iron in the removal of arsenic are promising. In this study, the performance of sand filter blended with several kinds of zero valent iron (Fe<sup>0</sup>), such as iron wool, iron fillings, and iron nails, were compared. These materials were combined in a sand filter column, and the efficiency was calculated using the As concentrations in the influent and effluent samples. Experiments were carried out in order to compare performance as a function of Fe<sup>0</sup> dose and contact time. The outcome of this investigation showed that sand filter containing iron wool had a better removal efficiency of arsenic removal than iron filings and iron nails. The results in all columns showed that as dosage was increased, removal efficiency of arsenic increased significantly. In case of contact time the results revealed that arsenic can effectively be removed from water in the first 48 h. The early adsorption response is quick in all columns, but get slower as time goes on. The highest removal efficiency was 99.6% and the lowest removal efficiency was 82.7%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HydroResearch\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 228-234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HydroResearch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589757823000215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HydroResearch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589757823000215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

废水中的砷对环境和人体健康有负面影响,因此必须妥善处理含砷废物。考虑到金属铁的可及性,研究零价铁在除砷中的潜在应用是很有前景的。在本研究中,比较了几种零价铁(Fe0),如铁毛、铁填料和铁钉的掺合性能。将这些材料组合在砂滤柱中,并使用进水和出水样品中的As浓度计算效率。为了比较Fe0剂量和接触时间对性能的影响,进行了实验。结果表明,含铁棉砂滤除砷效果优于铁屑和铁钉。各色谱柱的结果表明,随着投加量的增加,砷的去除率显著提高。在接触时间上,砷能在48 h内有效地从水中去除,各柱的早期吸附响应都很快,但随着时间的延长,吸附响应变慢。最高去除率为99.6%,最低去除率为82.7%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removal of arsenic in a sand filter coupled with zero valent iron

Arsenic (As) in wastewater has negative effects on the environment and human health, hence As containing wastes must be handled properly. Given the accessibility of metallic iron, studies investigating into the potential application of zerovalent iron in the removal of arsenic are promising. In this study, the performance of sand filter blended with several kinds of zero valent iron (Fe0), such as iron wool, iron fillings, and iron nails, were compared. These materials were combined in a sand filter column, and the efficiency was calculated using the As concentrations in the influent and effluent samples. Experiments were carried out in order to compare performance as a function of Fe0 dose and contact time. The outcome of this investigation showed that sand filter containing iron wool had a better removal efficiency of arsenic removal than iron filings and iron nails. The results in all columns showed that as dosage was increased, removal efficiency of arsenic increased significantly. In case of contact time the results revealed that arsenic can effectively be removed from water in the first 48 h. The early adsorption response is quick in all columns, but get slower as time goes on. The highest removal efficiency was 99.6% and the lowest removal efficiency was 82.7%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信