所有gogol推荐的审计员。亚历山大·斯洛宁斯基和茱莉亚·萨佐诺夫-斯洛宁斯基在关于迈耶霍尔多夫戏剧的争论中

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC
Ольга Купцова (Olga Kuptsova)
{"title":"所有gogol推荐的审计员。亚历山大·斯洛宁斯基和茱莉亚·萨佐诺夫-斯洛宁斯基在关于迈耶霍尔多夫戏剧的争论中","authors":"Ольга Купцова (Olga Kuptsova)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The discussion of Meyerhold’s “Revisor” (GosTIM, premiere – December 9, 1926) is an unprecedented case in European theatre of the first half of the twentieth century: no other theatrical event had such a breadth of public reaction. In the general controversy around the Meyerhold “Revisor”, the theatre-critical dialogue between the philologist and theatre critic of the Leningrad “Gvozdev school” Alexander Slonimsky and the director and theatre critic Iulia Sazonova-Slonimskaia (who were brother and sister) represents not only the views of Soviet Russia and Russia Abroad, but also those of the drama/theatre theorist and theatre practitioner. The dialogue considered in this article – at first glance, local and peripheral – turns out to be inscribed in the discussions of the 1920s about one of Meyerhold’s most controversial performances, and at the same time becomes the prehistory of the discussions of the 1930s about Meyerhold theatre’s formalism and “untimeness”, which brought a tragic denouement: the dissolution of the theatre and the death of its director.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":"135 ","pages":"Pages 207-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ревизор, откомментированный всем Гоголем. Александр Слонимский и Юлия Сазонова-Слонимская в полемике о мейерхольдовском спектакле\",\"authors\":\"Ольга Купцова (Olga Kuptsova)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The discussion of Meyerhold’s “Revisor” (GosTIM, premiere – December 9, 1926) is an unprecedented case in European theatre of the first half of the twentieth century: no other theatrical event had such a breadth of public reaction. In the general controversy around the Meyerhold “Revisor”, the theatre-critical dialogue between the philologist and theatre critic of the Leningrad “Gvozdev school” Alexander Slonimsky and the director and theatre critic Iulia Sazonova-Slonimskaia (who were brother and sister) represents not only the views of Soviet Russia and Russia Abroad, but also those of the drama/theatre theorist and theatre practitioner. The dialogue considered in this article – at first glance, local and peripheral – turns out to be inscribed in the discussions of the 1920s about one of Meyerhold’s most controversial performances, and at the same time becomes the prehistory of the discussions of the 1930s about Meyerhold theatre’s formalism and “untimeness”, which brought a tragic denouement: the dissolution of the theatre and the death of its director.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 207-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, SLAVIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对梅耶霍尔德的《修正者》(GosTIM,首演日期:1926年12月9日)的讨论在二十世纪上半叶的欧洲戏剧界是前所未有的:没有其他戏剧事件有如此广泛的公众反应。在围绕梅耶霍尔德《修正者》的普遍争论中,列宁格勒“戈佐夫德夫学派”的语言学家和戏剧评论家亚历山大·斯洛尼姆斯基与导演和戏剧评论家尤利娅·萨佐诺娃-斯洛尼姆斯卡娅(他们是兄妹)之间的戏剧批评对话不仅代表了苏俄和海外俄罗斯的观点,也代表了戏剧/戏剧理论家和戏剧实践者的观点。这篇文章所考虑的对话——乍一看,是局部的和外围的——原来是在20世纪20年代关于梅耶霍尔德最具争议的表演之一的讨论中被记录下来的,同时成为20世纪30年代关于梅耶霍尔德剧院的形式主义和“不合时宜”的讨论的前史,这带来了一个悲剧性的结局:剧院的解散和导演的死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ревизор, откомментированный всем Гоголем. Александр Слонимский и Юлия Сазонова-Слонимская в полемике о мейерхольдовском спектакле

The discussion of Meyerhold’s “Revisor” (GosTIM, premiere – December 9, 1926) is an unprecedented case in European theatre of the first half of the twentieth century: no other theatrical event had such a breadth of public reaction. In the general controversy around the Meyerhold “Revisor”, the theatre-critical dialogue between the philologist and theatre critic of the Leningrad “Gvozdev school” Alexander Slonimsky and the director and theatre critic Iulia Sazonova-Slonimskaia (who were brother and sister) represents not only the views of Soviet Russia and Russia Abroad, but also those of the drama/theatre theorist and theatre practitioner. The dialogue considered in this article – at first glance, local and peripheral – turns out to be inscribed in the discussions of the 1920s about one of Meyerhold’s most controversial performances, and at the same time becomes the prehistory of the discussions of the 1930s about Meyerhold theatre’s formalism and “untimeness”, which brought a tragic denouement: the dissolution of the theatre and the death of its director.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信