{"title":"所有gogol推荐的审计员。亚历山大·斯洛宁斯基和茱莉亚·萨佐诺夫-斯洛宁斯基在关于迈耶霍尔多夫戏剧的争论中","authors":"Ольга Купцова (Olga Kuptsova)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The discussion of Meyerhold’s “Revisor” (GosTIM, premiere – December 9, 1926) is an unprecedented case in European theatre of the first half of the twentieth century: no other theatrical event had such a breadth of public reaction. In the general controversy around the Meyerhold “Revisor”, the theatre-critical dialogue between the philologist and theatre critic of the Leningrad “Gvozdev school” Alexander Slonimsky and the director and theatre critic Iulia Sazonova-Slonimskaia (who were brother and sister) represents not only the views of Soviet Russia and Russia Abroad, but also those of the drama/theatre theorist and theatre practitioner. The dialogue considered in this article – at first glance, local and peripheral – turns out to be inscribed in the discussions of the 1920s about one of Meyerhold’s most controversial performances, and at the same time becomes the prehistory of the discussions of the 1930s about Meyerhold theatre’s formalism and “untimeness”, which brought a tragic denouement: the dissolution of the theatre and the death of its director.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":"135 ","pages":"Pages 207-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ревизор, откомментированный всем Гоголем. Александр Слонимский и Юлия Сазонова-Слонимская в полемике о мейерхольдовском спектакле\",\"authors\":\"Ольга Купцова (Olga Kuptsova)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The discussion of Meyerhold’s “Revisor” (GosTIM, premiere – December 9, 1926) is an unprecedented case in European theatre of the first half of the twentieth century: no other theatrical event had such a breadth of public reaction. In the general controversy around the Meyerhold “Revisor”, the theatre-critical dialogue between the philologist and theatre critic of the Leningrad “Gvozdev school” Alexander Slonimsky and the director and theatre critic Iulia Sazonova-Slonimskaia (who were brother and sister) represents not only the views of Soviet Russia and Russia Abroad, but also those of the drama/theatre theorist and theatre practitioner. The dialogue considered in this article – at first glance, local and peripheral – turns out to be inscribed in the discussions of the 1920s about one of Meyerhold’s most controversial performances, and at the same time becomes the prehistory of the discussions of the 1930s about Meyerhold theatre’s formalism and “untimeness”, which brought a tragic denouement: the dissolution of the theatre and the death of its director.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 207-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, SLAVIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ревизор, откомментированный всем Гоголем. Александр Слонимский и Юлия Сазонова-Слонимская в полемике о мейерхольдовском спектакле
The discussion of Meyerhold’s “Revisor” (GosTIM, premiere – December 9, 1926) is an unprecedented case in European theatre of the first half of the twentieth century: no other theatrical event had such a breadth of public reaction. In the general controversy around the Meyerhold “Revisor”, the theatre-critical dialogue between the philologist and theatre critic of the Leningrad “Gvozdev school” Alexander Slonimsky and the director and theatre critic Iulia Sazonova-Slonimskaia (who were brother and sister) represents not only the views of Soviet Russia and Russia Abroad, but also those of the drama/theatre theorist and theatre practitioner. The dialogue considered in this article – at first glance, local and peripheral – turns out to be inscribed in the discussions of the 1920s about one of Meyerhold’s most controversial performances, and at the same time becomes the prehistory of the discussions of the 1930s about Meyerhold theatre’s formalism and “untimeness”, which brought a tragic denouement: the dissolution of the theatre and the death of its director.
期刊介绍:
Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.