{"title":"定时递归CTL的尾部递归片段","authors":"Florian Bruse, Martin Lange","doi":"10.1016/j.ic.2023.105084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Timed Recursive CTL (TRCTL) was recently proposed as a merger of two extensions of the well-known branching-time logic CTL: Timed CTL on one hand is interpreted over real-time systems like timed automata, and Recursive CTL (RecCTL) on the other hand obtains high expressiveness through the introduction of a recursion operator. Model checking for the resulting logic is known to be 2-EXPTIME-complete.</p><p><span><span>The aim of this paper is to investigate the possibility to obtain a fragment of lower complexity without losing too much expressive power. It is obtained by a </span>syntactic property called “tail-recursiveness” that restricts the way that </span>recursive formulas can be built. This restriction is known to decrease the complexity of model checking by half an exponential in the untimed setting. We show that this also works in the real-time world: model checking for the tail-recursive fragment of TRCTL is EXPSPACE-complete already in its data complexity, i.e. for a fixed formula. The upper bound is obtained via a model-checking procedure on region graphs combining standard untiming constructions with a tailored algorithm. The lower bound is established by a reduction from a suitable tiling problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54985,"journal":{"name":"Information and Computation","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 105084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The tail-recursive fragment of timed recursive CTL\",\"authors\":\"Florian Bruse, Martin Lange\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ic.2023.105084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Timed Recursive CTL (TRCTL) was recently proposed as a merger of two extensions of the well-known branching-time logic CTL: Timed CTL on one hand is interpreted over real-time systems like timed automata, and Recursive CTL (RecCTL) on the other hand obtains high expressiveness through the introduction of a recursion operator. Model checking for the resulting logic is known to be 2-EXPTIME-complete.</p><p><span><span>The aim of this paper is to investigate the possibility to obtain a fragment of lower complexity without losing too much expressive power. It is obtained by a </span>syntactic property called “tail-recursiveness” that restricts the way that </span>recursive formulas can be built. This restriction is known to decrease the complexity of model checking by half an exponential in the untimed setting. We show that this also works in the real-time world: model checking for the tail-recursive fragment of TRCTL is EXPSPACE-complete already in its data complexity, i.e. for a fixed formula. The upper bound is obtained via a model-checking procedure on region graphs combining standard untiming constructions with a tailored algorithm. The lower bound is established by a reduction from a suitable tiling problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Computation\",\"volume\":\"294 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540123000871\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890540123000871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The tail-recursive fragment of timed recursive CTL
Timed Recursive CTL (TRCTL) was recently proposed as a merger of two extensions of the well-known branching-time logic CTL: Timed CTL on one hand is interpreted over real-time systems like timed automata, and Recursive CTL (RecCTL) on the other hand obtains high expressiveness through the introduction of a recursion operator. Model checking for the resulting logic is known to be 2-EXPTIME-complete.
The aim of this paper is to investigate the possibility to obtain a fragment of lower complexity without losing too much expressive power. It is obtained by a syntactic property called “tail-recursiveness” that restricts the way that recursive formulas can be built. This restriction is known to decrease the complexity of model checking by half an exponential in the untimed setting. We show that this also works in the real-time world: model checking for the tail-recursive fragment of TRCTL is EXPSPACE-complete already in its data complexity, i.e. for a fixed formula. The upper bound is obtained via a model-checking procedure on region graphs combining standard untiming constructions with a tailored algorithm. The lower bound is established by a reduction from a suitable tiling problem.
期刊介绍:
Information and Computation welcomes original papers in all areas of theoretical computer science and computational applications of information theory. Survey articles of exceptional quality will also be considered. Particularly welcome are papers contributing new results in active theoretical areas such as
-Biological computation and computational biology-
Computational complexity-
Computer theorem-proving-
Concurrency and distributed process theory-
Cryptographic theory-
Data base theory-
Decision problems in logic-
Design and analysis of algorithms-
Discrete optimization and mathematical programming-
Inductive inference and learning theory-
Logic & constraint programming-
Program verification & model checking-
Probabilistic & Quantum computation-
Semantics of programming languages-
Symbolic computation, lambda calculus, and rewriting systems-
Types and typechecking