Sijie Han , Shuxun Sang , Jinchao Zhang , Wenxin Xiang , Ang Xu
{"title":"基于吸附等温实验的不同温度下CO2地质封存能力评价——以沁水盆地3号煤为例","authors":"Sijie Han , Shuxun Sang , Jinchao Zhang , Wenxin Xiang , Ang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.petlm.2022.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an important pathway for China to achieve its “2060 carbon neutrality” strategy. Geological sequestration of CO<sub>2</sub> in deep coals is one of the methods of CCUS. Here, the No. 3 anthracite in the Qinshui Basin was studied using the superposition of each CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage category to construct models for theoretical CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage capacity (TCGSC) assessment, and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity variation with depth. CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage potential of No. 3 anthracite coal was assessed by integrating the adsorption capacity with the static storage and dissolution capacities. The results show that (1) CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacities of XJ and SH coals initially increased with depth, peaked at 47.7 cm<sup>3</sup>/g and 41.5 cm<sup>3</sup>/g around 1000 m, and later decreased with depth. (2) four assessment areas and their geological model parameters were established based on CO<sub>2</sub> phase variation and spatial distribution of coal thickness, (3) the abundance of CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage capacity (ACGSC), which averages 40 cm<sup>3</sup>/g, shows an analogous circularity-sharp distribution, with the high abundance area influenced by depth and coal rank, and (4) the TCGSC and the effective CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage capacity (ECGSC) are 9.72 Gt and 6.54 Gt; the gas subcritical area accounted for 76.41% of the total TCGSC. Although adsorption-related storage capacity accounted for more than 90% of total TCGSC, its proportion, however, decreased with depth. Future CO<sub>2</sub>-ECBM project should focus on high-rank coals in gas subcritical and gas-like supercritical areas. Such research will provide significant reference for assessment of CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage capacity in deep coals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37433,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 274-284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of CO2 geological storage capacity based on adsorption isothermal experiments at various temperatures: A case study of No. 3 coal in the Qinshui Basin\",\"authors\":\"Sijie Han , Shuxun Sang , Jinchao Zhang , Wenxin Xiang , Ang Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.petlm.2022.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an important pathway for China to achieve its “2060 carbon neutrality” strategy. Geological sequestration of CO<sub>2</sub> in deep coals is one of the methods of CCUS. Here, the No. 3 anthracite in the Qinshui Basin was studied using the superposition of each CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage category to construct models for theoretical CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage capacity (TCGSC) assessment, and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacity variation with depth. CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage potential of No. 3 anthracite coal was assessed by integrating the adsorption capacity with the static storage and dissolution capacities. The results show that (1) CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption capacities of XJ and SH coals initially increased with depth, peaked at 47.7 cm<sup>3</sup>/g and 41.5 cm<sup>3</sup>/g around 1000 m, and later decreased with depth. (2) four assessment areas and their geological model parameters were established based on CO<sub>2</sub> phase variation and spatial distribution of coal thickness, (3) the abundance of CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage capacity (ACGSC), which averages 40 cm<sup>3</sup>/g, shows an analogous circularity-sharp distribution, with the high abundance area influenced by depth and coal rank, and (4) the TCGSC and the effective CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage capacity (ECGSC) are 9.72 Gt and 6.54 Gt; the gas subcritical area accounted for 76.41% of the total TCGSC. Although adsorption-related storage capacity accounted for more than 90% of total TCGSC, its proportion, however, decreased with depth. Future CO<sub>2</sub>-ECBM project should focus on high-rank coals in gas subcritical and gas-like supercritical areas. Such research will provide significant reference for assessment of CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage capacity in deep coals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 274-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656122000372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405656122000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of CO2 geological storage capacity based on adsorption isothermal experiments at various temperatures: A case study of No. 3 coal in the Qinshui Basin
Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an important pathway for China to achieve its “2060 carbon neutrality” strategy. Geological sequestration of CO2 in deep coals is one of the methods of CCUS. Here, the No. 3 anthracite in the Qinshui Basin was studied using the superposition of each CO2 geological storage category to construct models for theoretical CO2 geological storage capacity (TCGSC) assessment, and CO2 adsorption capacity variation with depth. CO2 geological storage potential of No. 3 anthracite coal was assessed by integrating the adsorption capacity with the static storage and dissolution capacities. The results show that (1) CO2 adsorption capacities of XJ and SH coals initially increased with depth, peaked at 47.7 cm3/g and 41.5 cm3/g around 1000 m, and later decreased with depth. (2) four assessment areas and their geological model parameters were established based on CO2 phase variation and spatial distribution of coal thickness, (3) the abundance of CO2 geological storage capacity (ACGSC), which averages 40 cm3/g, shows an analogous circularity-sharp distribution, with the high abundance area influenced by depth and coal rank, and (4) the TCGSC and the effective CO2 geological storage capacity (ECGSC) are 9.72 Gt and 6.54 Gt; the gas subcritical area accounted for 76.41% of the total TCGSC. Although adsorption-related storage capacity accounted for more than 90% of total TCGSC, its proportion, however, decreased with depth. Future CO2-ECBM project should focus on high-rank coals in gas subcritical and gas-like supercritical areas. Such research will provide significant reference for assessment of CO2 geological storage capacity in deep coals.
期刊介绍:
Examples of appropriate topical areas that will be considered include the following: 1.comprehensive research on oil and gas reservoir (reservoir geology): -geological basis of oil and gas reservoirs -reservoir geochemistry -reservoir formation mechanism -reservoir identification methods and techniques 2.kinetics of oil and gas basins and analyses of potential oil and gas resources: -fine description factors of hydrocarbon accumulation -mechanism analysis on recovery and dynamic accumulation process -relationship between accumulation factors and the accumulation process -analysis of oil and gas potential resource 3.theories and methods for complex reservoir geophysical prospecting: -geophysical basis of deep geologic structures and background of hydrocarbon occurrence -geophysical prediction of deep and complex reservoirs -physical test analyses and numerical simulations of reservoir rocks -anisotropic medium seismic imaging theory and new technology for multiwave seismic exploration -o theories and methods for reservoir fluid geophysical identification and prediction 4.theories, methods, technology, and design for complex reservoir development: -reservoir percolation theory and application technology -field development theories and methods -theory and technology for enhancing recovery efficiency 5.working liquid for oil and gas wells and reservoir protection technology: -working chemicals and mechanics for oil and gas wells -reservoir protection technology 6.new techniques and technologies for oil and gas drilling and production: -under-balanced drilling/gas drilling -special-track well drilling -cementing and completion of oil and gas wells -engineering safety applications for oil and gas wells -new technology of fracture acidizing