{"title":"在高速公路和金融科技平台之间:全球中国和非洲的基础设施状态","authors":"Zhengli Huang , Andrea Pollio","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we juxtapose two different sectors of China’s economic presence in Africa: transport and digital infrastructure. Using the case of Kenya, a country that hosts several flagship corridors funded by Chinese loans and where Chinese “digital champions” have been active for two decades, we highlight some of the differences and similarities between these two forms of China’s going-out capitalism in the continent.</p><p>Our argument is that these ‘varieties of capital’ are conterminous, and they operate through both strategic and contingent overlaps within the same ‘state-market nexus’ and at the interface with programmes and goals of the African ‘infrastructure state’. To illustrate this point, we draw on a comparative research effort inspired by a growing body of scholarship that has been labelled under the tag of ‘Global China’ and by a political economy reading of ‘the market-in-state’ system. This paper thus contributes empirically and conceptually to de-essentializing the Chinese presence in the African continent by recognizing the contextual agencies that shape it—the ambitious developmental agendas of the African state, in particular—as well as the interplay between its different corporate forms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 103876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between highways and fintech platforms: Global China’s and Africa’s infrastructure state\",\"authors\":\"Zhengli Huang , Andrea Pollio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we juxtapose two different sectors of China’s economic presence in Africa: transport and digital infrastructure. Using the case of Kenya, a country that hosts several flagship corridors funded by Chinese loans and where Chinese “digital champions” have been active for two decades, we highlight some of the differences and similarities between these two forms of China’s going-out capitalism in the continent.</p><p>Our argument is that these ‘varieties of capital’ are conterminous, and they operate through both strategic and contingent overlaps within the same ‘state-market nexus’ and at the interface with programmes and goals of the African ‘infrastructure state’. To illustrate this point, we draw on a comparative research effort inspired by a growing body of scholarship that has been labelled under the tag of ‘Global China’ and by a political economy reading of ‘the market-in-state’ system. This paper thus contributes empirically and conceptually to de-essentializing the Chinese presence in the African continent by recognizing the contextual agencies that shape it—the ambitious developmental agendas of the African state, in particular—as well as the interplay between its different corporate forms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718523002026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718523002026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Between highways and fintech platforms: Global China’s and Africa’s infrastructure state
In this paper, we juxtapose two different sectors of China’s economic presence in Africa: transport and digital infrastructure. Using the case of Kenya, a country that hosts several flagship corridors funded by Chinese loans and where Chinese “digital champions” have been active for two decades, we highlight some of the differences and similarities between these two forms of China’s going-out capitalism in the continent.
Our argument is that these ‘varieties of capital’ are conterminous, and they operate through both strategic and contingent overlaps within the same ‘state-market nexus’ and at the interface with programmes and goals of the African ‘infrastructure state’. To illustrate this point, we draw on a comparative research effort inspired by a growing body of scholarship that has been labelled under the tag of ‘Global China’ and by a political economy reading of ‘the market-in-state’ system. This paper thus contributes empirically and conceptually to de-essentializing the Chinese presence in the African continent by recognizing the contextual agencies that shape it—the ambitious developmental agendas of the African state, in particular—as well as the interplay between its different corporate forms.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.