2019冠状病毒病疫情期间养老院预防感染和维护居民健康的优先措施:在线名义小组技术研究中确定的工作人员和居民代表的共识

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Lisa S. van Tol , Hanneke J.A. Smaling , Sarah I.M. Janus , Monique A.A. Caljouw , Wilco P. Achterberg
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病疫情期间养老院预防感染和维护居民健康的优先措施:在线名义小组技术研究中确定的工作人员和居民代表的共识","authors":"Lisa S. van Tol ,&nbsp;Hanneke J.A. Smaling ,&nbsp;Sarah I.M. Janus ,&nbsp;Monique A.A. Caljouw ,&nbsp;Wilco P. Achterberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 infection prevention measures can negatively impact nursing home residents’ well-being. Society has been concerned about the imbalance between infection prevention and residents’ well-being, and about nursing home residents’ autonomy in COVID-19 policymaking.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explores consensus among nursing home staff about which measures they found to be most important in contributing to preventing infections and to maintaining well-being of residents during COVID-19 outbreaks. In addition, this study explores the decision-making processes regarding COVID-19 measures and the involvement of residents or their representatives.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Mixed methods based on an online nominal group technique.</p></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><p>Dutch nursing homes, June–November 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Managers, policy advisors, elderly care physicians, psychologists, a spiritual counselor, nurses, care assistants, and resident representatives (<em>N</em> = 35).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four panels from the viewpoint of infection prevention, and four panels from the viewpoint of well-being were performed with 3 to 7 participants per panel. Participants individually selected the measure they found most important, discussed these measures together in an online conversation, and rated the importance and urgency of these measures during COVID-19 outbreaks on a 5-point Likert scale. The measures that were rated as (very) important and (very) urgent by all members of that panel were defined as ‘prioritized in consensus’. Panels also discussed the decision-making process regarding COVID-19 measures and the involvement of residents or their representatives. These conversations were transcribed verbatim and thematically coded using an inductive approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The infection prevention panels prioritized isolation measures; testing measures; testing and isolation combinations; use of personal protective equipment around (suspected) infected residents; and preparation for outbreaks by COVID-19 outbreak teams. The well-being panels prioritized cohort isolation, testing combined with cohort isolation and with isolation in residents’ rooms, exceptions to visitor bans, maximum numbers of visitors, and registration and accompanying visitors to the residents’ rooms. Resident representatives and staff were dissatisfied with their reduced involvement in policy making during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, although they understood that decisions had to be made quickly.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Staff and resident representatives should be involved in COVID-19 policy making. According to them, priority COVID-19 measures should include: cohort isolation, testing and isolation combinations, use of personal protective equipment, crisis management by COVID-19 outbreak teams, and nursing home visit regulations and instruction of visitors. Combining these measures may be a first step towards packages of COVID-19 measures that better balance infection prevention and maintaining residents’ well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>N/A</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>Priority COVID-19 nursing home measures are isolation, testing, testing and isolation combinations, PPE use, preparations by outbreak teams, and visit regulations @wilcoachterberg</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priority measures to prevent infections and maintain residents’ well-being during COVID-19 outbreaks in nursing homes: Consensus among staff and resident representatives determined in an online nominal group technique study\",\"authors\":\"Lisa S. van Tol ,&nbsp;Hanneke J.A. Smaling ,&nbsp;Sarah I.M. Janus ,&nbsp;Monique A.A. Caljouw ,&nbsp;Wilco P. Achterberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 infection prevention measures can negatively impact nursing home residents’ well-being. Society has been concerned about the imbalance between infection prevention and residents’ well-being, and about nursing home residents’ autonomy in COVID-19 policymaking.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explores consensus among nursing home staff about which measures they found to be most important in contributing to preventing infections and to maintaining well-being of residents during COVID-19 outbreaks. In addition, this study explores the decision-making processes regarding COVID-19 measures and the involvement of residents or their representatives.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Mixed methods based on an online nominal group technique.</p></div><div><h3>Setting(s)</h3><p>Dutch nursing homes, June–November 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Managers, policy advisors, elderly care physicians, psychologists, a spiritual counselor, nurses, care assistants, and resident representatives (<em>N</em> = 35).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four panels from the viewpoint of infection prevention, and four panels from the viewpoint of well-being were performed with 3 to 7 participants per panel. Participants individually selected the measure they found most important, discussed these measures together in an online conversation, and rated the importance and urgency of these measures during COVID-19 outbreaks on a 5-point Likert scale. The measures that were rated as (very) important and (very) urgent by all members of that panel were defined as ‘prioritized in consensus’. Panels also discussed the decision-making process regarding COVID-19 measures and the involvement of residents or their representatives. These conversations were transcribed verbatim and thematically coded using an inductive approach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The infection prevention panels prioritized isolation measures; testing measures; testing and isolation combinations; use of personal protective equipment around (suspected) infected residents; and preparation for outbreaks by COVID-19 outbreak teams. The well-being panels prioritized cohort isolation, testing combined with cohort isolation and with isolation in residents’ rooms, exceptions to visitor bans, maximum numbers of visitors, and registration and accompanying visitors to the residents’ rooms. Resident representatives and staff were dissatisfied with their reduced involvement in policy making during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, although they understood that decisions had to be made quickly.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Staff and resident representatives should be involved in COVID-19 policy making. According to them, priority COVID-19 measures should include: cohort isolation, testing and isolation combinations, use of personal protective equipment, crisis management by COVID-19 outbreak teams, and nursing home visit regulations and instruction of visitors. Combining these measures may be a first step towards packages of COVID-19 measures that better balance infection prevention and maintaining residents’ well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>N/A</p></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><p>Priority COVID-19 nursing home measures are isolation, testing, testing and isolation combinations, PPE use, preparations by outbreak teams, and visit regulations @wilcoachterberg</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X23000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

covid -19感染预防措施会对养老院居民的福祉产生负面影响。社会一直关注预防感染与居民福祉之间的不平衡,以及养老院居民在COVID-19政策制定中的自主权。目的探讨在2019冠状病毒病暴发期间,养老院工作人员认为哪些措施对预防感染和维持居民健康最重要的共识。此外,本研究还探讨了COVID-19措施的决策过程以及居民或其代表的参与。设计基于在线名义小组技术的混合方法。设置(s)荷兰养老院,2020年6月- 11月。参与者:管理人员、政策顾问、老年护理医师、心理学家、精神咨询师、护士、护理助理和居民代表(N = 35)。方法从感染预防角度分为4个小组,从健康角度分为4个小组,每个小组3 ~ 7人。参与者单独选择他们认为最重要的措施,在在线对话中一起讨论这些措施,并在COVID-19爆发期间以5分李克特量表对这些措施的重要性和紧迫性进行评级。被该小组所有成员评为(非常)重要和(非常)紧急的措施被定义为“一致确定优先次序”。小组还讨论了有关COVID-19措施的决策过程以及居民或其代表的参与。这些对话被逐字记录下来,并使用归纳方法按主题进行编码。结果感染预防组优先采取隔离措施;测试方法;检测和隔离组合;在(疑似)感染居民周围使用个人防护装备;以及COVID-19疫情防控小组的疫情准备工作。福祉小组优先考虑队列隔离、与队列隔离和居民房间隔离相结合的测试、访客禁令的例外情况、访客的最大人数以及登记和陪同访客进入居民房间。驻地代表和工作人员对他们在2019冠状病毒病大流行的头几个月里较少参与政策制定感到不满,尽管他们明白必须迅速做出决定。结论工作人员和驻地代表应参与COVID-19政策制定。他们认为,优先采取的措施应包括:队列隔离、检测和隔离组合、个人防护装备的使用、疫情团队的危机管理、养老院探访规定和访客指导。将这些措施结合起来,可能是朝着更好地平衡感染预防和维护居民福祉的COVID-19一揽子措施迈出的第一步。2019冠状病毒病养老院的优先措施是隔离、检测、检测和隔离组合、个人防护装备的使用、疫情小组的准备工作和访问规定@wilcoachterberg
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Priority measures to prevent infections and maintain residents’ well-being during COVID-19 outbreaks in nursing homes: Consensus among staff and resident representatives determined in an online nominal group technique study

Background

COVID-19 infection prevention measures can negatively impact nursing home residents’ well-being. Society has been concerned about the imbalance between infection prevention and residents’ well-being, and about nursing home residents’ autonomy in COVID-19 policymaking.

Objective

This study explores consensus among nursing home staff about which measures they found to be most important in contributing to preventing infections and to maintaining well-being of residents during COVID-19 outbreaks. In addition, this study explores the decision-making processes regarding COVID-19 measures and the involvement of residents or their representatives.

Design

Mixed methods based on an online nominal group technique.

Setting(s)

Dutch nursing homes, June–November 2020.

Participants

Managers, policy advisors, elderly care physicians, psychologists, a spiritual counselor, nurses, care assistants, and resident representatives (N = 35).

Methods

Four panels from the viewpoint of infection prevention, and four panels from the viewpoint of well-being were performed with 3 to 7 participants per panel. Participants individually selected the measure they found most important, discussed these measures together in an online conversation, and rated the importance and urgency of these measures during COVID-19 outbreaks on a 5-point Likert scale. The measures that were rated as (very) important and (very) urgent by all members of that panel were defined as ‘prioritized in consensus’. Panels also discussed the decision-making process regarding COVID-19 measures and the involvement of residents or their representatives. These conversations were transcribed verbatim and thematically coded using an inductive approach.

Results

The infection prevention panels prioritized isolation measures; testing measures; testing and isolation combinations; use of personal protective equipment around (suspected) infected residents; and preparation for outbreaks by COVID-19 outbreak teams. The well-being panels prioritized cohort isolation, testing combined with cohort isolation and with isolation in residents’ rooms, exceptions to visitor bans, maximum numbers of visitors, and registration and accompanying visitors to the residents’ rooms. Resident representatives and staff were dissatisfied with their reduced involvement in policy making during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, although they understood that decisions had to be made quickly.

Conclusions

Staff and resident representatives should be involved in COVID-19 policy making. According to them, priority COVID-19 measures should include: cohort isolation, testing and isolation combinations, use of personal protective equipment, crisis management by COVID-19 outbreak teams, and nursing home visit regulations and instruction of visitors. Combining these measures may be a first step towards packages of COVID-19 measures that better balance infection prevention and maintaining residents’ well-being.

Registration

N/A

Tweetable abstract

Priority COVID-19 nursing home measures are isolation, testing, testing and isolation combinations, PPE use, preparations by outbreak teams, and visit regulations @wilcoachterberg

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信