与邻居保持联系:社会规范反馈干预对城市多户住宅回收行为的影响

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Elizabeth L. Hewitt, Yiyi Wang, Alexandra (Sasha) Eck, David J. Tonjes
{"title":"与邻居保持联系:社会规范反馈干预对城市多户住宅回收行为的影响","authors":"Elizabeth L. Hewitt,&nbsp;Yiyi Wang,&nbsp;Alexandra (Sasha) Eck,&nbsp;David J. Tonjes","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing research indicates comparative social norm feedback can be influential in nudging recycling in more sustainable directions, but little work has explored this mechanism in urban multifamily buildings. This research builds upon existing work in this area by conducting 12 weeks of interventions in two multifamily buildings in New York City, in which one building (n=372) received weekly comparative feedback <em>comparing their building's recycling to neighbors</em> and another building (n=602) received weekly non-comparative feedback data about <em>their building only.</em> Two main findings emerged: (1) Data indicate increased recycling by bag weight (interpolated for a one-year period from the weights of waste samples) in the intervention period in both buildings, pointing to effectiveness in increasing recycling from social norm feedback, and (2) the <em>comparative feedback mechanism</em> appears to be a stronger driver of behavior change. Takeaways from this work can inform urban policy and property manager decision-making for solid waste management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 200156"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keeping up with my neighbors: The influence of social norm feedback interventions on recycling behavior in urban multifamily buildings\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth L. Hewitt,&nbsp;Yiyi Wang,&nbsp;Alexandra (Sasha) Eck,&nbsp;David J. Tonjes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Existing research indicates comparative social norm feedback can be influential in nudging recycling in more sustainable directions, but little work has explored this mechanism in urban multifamily buildings. This research builds upon existing work in this area by conducting 12 weeks of interventions in two multifamily buildings in New York City, in which one building (n=372) received weekly comparative feedback <em>comparing their building's recycling to neighbors</em> and another building (n=602) received weekly non-comparative feedback data about <em>their building only.</em> Two main findings emerged: (1) Data indicate increased recycling by bag weight (interpolated for a one-year period from the weights of waste samples) in the intervention period in both buildings, pointing to effectiveness in increasing recycling from social norm feedback, and (2) the <em>comparative feedback mechanism</em> appears to be a stronger driver of behavior change. Takeaways from this work can inform urban policy and property manager decision-making for solid waste management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources, conservation & recycling advances\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources, conservation & recycling advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378923000287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378923000287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

现有研究表明,比较社会规范反馈可能会对推动回收朝着更可持续的方向发展产生影响,但很少有工作在城市多户建筑中探索这一机制。这项研究建立在该领域现有工作的基础上,对纽约市的两栋多户建筑进行了为期12周的干预,其中一栋建筑(n=372)每周收到比较反馈,将其建筑的回收情况与邻居进行比较,而另一栋建筑(n=602)每周只收到关于其建筑的非比较反馈数据。出现了两个主要发现:(1)数据表明,在干预期内,两栋建筑的袋重回收率都有所增加(根据废物样本的重量插值一年),这表明社会规范反馈在增加回收率方面是有效的;(2)比较反馈机制似乎是行为改变的更强驱动力。这项工作的成果可以为城市政策和物业管理者的固体废物管理决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Keeping up with my neighbors: The influence of social norm feedback interventions on recycling behavior in urban multifamily buildings

Existing research indicates comparative social norm feedback can be influential in nudging recycling in more sustainable directions, but little work has explored this mechanism in urban multifamily buildings. This research builds upon existing work in this area by conducting 12 weeks of interventions in two multifamily buildings in New York City, in which one building (n=372) received weekly comparative feedback comparing their building's recycling to neighbors and another building (n=602) received weekly non-comparative feedback data about their building only. Two main findings emerged: (1) Data indicate increased recycling by bag weight (interpolated for a one-year period from the weights of waste samples) in the intervention period in both buildings, pointing to effectiveness in increasing recycling from social norm feedback, and (2) the comparative feedback mechanism appears to be a stronger driver of behavior change. Takeaways from this work can inform urban policy and property manager decision-making for solid waste management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信