{"title":"达尔文喜欢喝茶吗?","authors":"Georgios Ampatzidis, Marida Ergazaki","doi":"10.1007/s11191-021-00305-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature of science (NOS) is considered an important component of scientific literacy. Supporting students to develop a comprehensive NOS understanding is one of the most commonly described objectives within science education. Moreover, history of science can arguably provide a good context for NOS teaching and learning; it has been suggested that using historical contexts to introduce general NOS aspects in an explicit, systematic way can enhance students’ understanding about NOS. This paper has to do with a research project concerned with the creation of historical narratives that draw specifically on the history of the idea of the Balance of Nature (BON)—a persistent, socio-culturally originated idea that implies a predetermined order and stability in the natural world—in order to support university students to better understand some general NOS aspects. In particular, we report on our narrative entitled “Tea for two” which sets focus on the socio-cultural embeddedness of science. More specifically, we (a) give an overview of what we drew upon in order to create “Tea for two” (the BON-idea history and the types of historical narratives for educational use), (b) highlight the historical background of “Tea for two” and present the narrative itself, (c) discuss “Tea for two” in terms of its essential features and the strategies we considered, and (d) make some final remarks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56374,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"37 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Did Darwin Prefer His Tea?\",\"authors\":\"Georgios Ampatzidis, Marida Ergazaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11191-021-00305-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Nature of science (NOS) is considered an important component of scientific literacy. Supporting students to develop a comprehensive NOS understanding is one of the most commonly described objectives within science education. Moreover, history of science can arguably provide a good context for NOS teaching and learning; it has been suggested that using historical contexts to introduce general NOS aspects in an explicit, systematic way can enhance students’ understanding about NOS. This paper has to do with a research project concerned with the creation of historical narratives that draw specifically on the history of the idea of the Balance of Nature (BON)—a persistent, socio-culturally originated idea that implies a predetermined order and stability in the natural world—in order to support university students to better understand some general NOS aspects. In particular, we report on our narrative entitled “Tea for two” which sets focus on the socio-cultural embeddedness of science. More specifically, we (a) give an overview of what we drew upon in order to create “Tea for two” (the BON-idea history and the types of historical narratives for educational use), (b) highlight the historical background of “Tea for two” and present the narrative itself, (c) discuss “Tea for two” in terms of its essential features and the strategies we considered, and (d) make some final remarks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-021-00305-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-021-00305-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nature of science (NOS) is considered an important component of scientific literacy. Supporting students to develop a comprehensive NOS understanding is one of the most commonly described objectives within science education. Moreover, history of science can arguably provide a good context for NOS teaching and learning; it has been suggested that using historical contexts to introduce general NOS aspects in an explicit, systematic way can enhance students’ understanding about NOS. This paper has to do with a research project concerned with the creation of historical narratives that draw specifically on the history of the idea of the Balance of Nature (BON)—a persistent, socio-culturally originated idea that implies a predetermined order and stability in the natural world—in order to support university students to better understand some general NOS aspects. In particular, we report on our narrative entitled “Tea for two” which sets focus on the socio-cultural embeddedness of science. More specifically, we (a) give an overview of what we drew upon in order to create “Tea for two” (the BON-idea history and the types of historical narratives for educational use), (b) highlight the historical background of “Tea for two” and present the narrative itself, (c) discuss “Tea for two” in terms of its essential features and the strategies we considered, and (d) make some final remarks.
期刊介绍:
Science & Education publishes research informed by the history, philosophy and sociology of science and mathematics that seeks to promote better teaching, learning, and curricula in science and mathematics. More particularly Science & Education promotes: The utilization of historical, philosophical and sociological scholarship to clarify and deal with the many intellectual issues facing contemporary science and mathematics education. Collaboration between the communities of scientists, mathematicians, historians, philosophers, cognitive psychologists, sociologists, science and mathematics educators, and school and college teachers. An understanding of the philosophical, cultural, economic, religious, psychological and ethical dimensions of modern science and the interplay of these factors in the history of science. The inclusion of appropriate history and philosophy of science and mathematics courses in science and mathematics teacher-education programmes. The dissemination of accounts of lessons, units of work, and programmes in science and mathematics, at all levels, that have successfully utilized history and philosophy. Discussion of the philosophy and purposes of science and mathematics education, and their place in, and contribution to, the intellectual and ethical development of individuals and cultures.