具有有限学习和规划的代理人在超图上玩的公共产品游戏

Q1 Mathematics
Prakhar Godara, Stephan Herminghaus
{"title":"具有有限学习和规划的代理人在超图上玩的公共产品游戏","authors":"Prakhar Godara,&nbsp;Stephan Herminghaus","doi":"10.1016/j.csfx.2023.100099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Public goods games between model agents with bounded rationality and a simple learning rule, which have been previously shown to represent experimentally observed human playing behavior, are studied by direct simulation on various lattices with different network topology. Despite strong coupling between playing groups, we find that average investments do not significantly depend upon network topology, but are determined solely by immediate local network environment. Furthermore, the dependence of investments on characteristic agent parameters factorizes into a function of individual cognitive budget, <em>K</em>, and a simple function <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo><mi>c</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>)</mo><mo>/</mo><mi>β</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>, where <span><math><mi>c</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>)</mo></math></span> is the group centrality and <span><math><mi>β</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>12.5</mn></math></span> for all networks investigated. Given the good agreement of agent behavior with available experiments, this seems to indicate that even complex societal networks of investment in public goods may be accessible to predictive simulation with limited effort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37147,"journal":{"name":"Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public goods games played on hypergraphs, by agents with bounded learning and planning\",\"authors\":\"Prakhar Godara,&nbsp;Stephan Herminghaus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csfx.2023.100099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Public goods games between model agents with bounded rationality and a simple learning rule, which have been previously shown to represent experimentally observed human playing behavior, are studied by direct simulation on various lattices with different network topology. Despite strong coupling between playing groups, we find that average investments do not significantly depend upon network topology, but are determined solely by immediate local network environment. Furthermore, the dependence of investments on characteristic agent parameters factorizes into a function of individual cognitive budget, <em>K</em>, and a simple function <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>/</mo><mo>(</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>+</mo><mi>c</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>)</mo><mo>/</mo><mi>β</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>, where <span><math><mi>c</mi><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>)</mo></math></span> is the group centrality and <span><math><mi>β</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>12.5</mn></math></span> for all networks investigated. Given the good agreement of agent behavior with available experiments, this seems to indicate that even complex societal networks of investment in public goods may be accessible to predictive simulation with limited effort.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100099\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259005442300009X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259005442300009X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过在不同网络拓扑的各种网格上的直接模拟,研究了具有有限理性和简单学习规则的模型代理之间的公共产品博弈,这些模型代理先前已被证明代表了实验观察到的人类游戏行为。尽管游戏组之间有很强的耦合性,但我们发现平均投资并不显著依赖于网络拓扑,而是完全由直接的本地网络环境决定。此外,投资对特征代理参数的依赖性被分解为个体认知预算的函数K和简单函数1/(1+c(0)/β),其中c(O)是群体中心性,对于所研究的所有网络,β=12.5。鉴于代理人行为与现有实验的良好一致性,这似乎表明,即使是公共产品投资的复杂社会网络,也可以通过有限的努力进行预测模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public goods games played on hypergraphs, by agents with bounded learning and planning

Public goods games between model agents with bounded rationality and a simple learning rule, which have been previously shown to represent experimentally observed human playing behavior, are studied by direct simulation on various lattices with different network topology. Despite strong coupling between playing groups, we find that average investments do not significantly depend upon network topology, but are determined solely by immediate local network environment. Furthermore, the dependence of investments on characteristic agent parameters factorizes into a function of individual cognitive budget, K, and a simple function 1/(1+c(0)/β), where c(0) is the group centrality and β=12.5 for all networks investigated. Given the good agreement of agent behavior with available experiments, this seems to indicate that even complex societal networks of investment in public goods may be accessible to predictive simulation with limited effort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信