股票非流动性和期权回报

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Stefan Kanne , Olaf Korn , Marliese Uhrig-Homburg
{"title":"股票非流动性和期权回报","authors":"Stefan Kanne ,&nbsp;Olaf Korn ,&nbsp;Marliese Uhrig-Homburg","doi":"10.1016/j.finmar.2022.100765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We provide evidence of a strong effect of the underlying stock's illiquidity on option returns. Conditional on end-user demand, illiquidity premiums are negative and decrease in stock illiquidity for options where end users are net buyers, while premiums are positive and tend to increase otherwise. Our results cannot be explained by common risk factors and cross-sectional differences in stock volatility or option spreads and are robust to different illiquidity measures and data periods. The observed pattern is consistent with an intermediary hedging cost channel and the magnitudes of our illiquidity premiums are in line with reasonable transaction costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Markets","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 100765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stock illiquidity and option returns\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Kanne ,&nbsp;Olaf Korn ,&nbsp;Marliese Uhrig-Homburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.finmar.2022.100765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We provide evidence of a strong effect of the underlying stock's illiquidity on option returns. Conditional on end-user demand, illiquidity premiums are negative and decrease in stock illiquidity for options where end users are net buyers, while premiums are positive and tend to increase otherwise. Our results cannot be explained by common risk factors and cross-sectional differences in stock volatility or option spreads and are robust to different illiquidity measures and data periods. The observed pattern is consistent with an intermediary hedging cost channel and the magnitudes of our illiquidity premiums are in line with reasonable transaction costs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Markets\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386418122000556\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386418122000556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提供了相关股票的非流动性对期权回报的强烈影响的证据。以最终用户需求为条件,非流动性溢价为负,在最终用户为净买家的期权中,股票非流动性降低,而溢价为正,否则往往会增加。我们的结果无法用常见的风险因素和股票波动率或期权价差的横截面差异来解释,并且对不同的非流动性指标和数据期是稳健的。观察到的模式与中介对冲成本渠道一致,我们的非流动性溢价幅度与合理的交易成本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stock illiquidity and option returns

We provide evidence of a strong effect of the underlying stock's illiquidity on option returns. Conditional on end-user demand, illiquidity premiums are negative and decrease in stock illiquidity for options where end users are net buyers, while premiums are positive and tend to increase otherwise. Our results cannot be explained by common risk factors and cross-sectional differences in stock volatility or option spreads and are robust to different illiquidity measures and data periods. The observed pattern is consistent with an intermediary hedging cost channel and the magnitudes of our illiquidity premiums are in line with reasonable transaction costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Markets
Journal of Financial Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Markets publishes high quality original research on applied and theoretical issues related to securities trading and pricing. Area of coverage includes the analysis and design of trading mechanisms, optimal order placement strategies, the role of information in securities markets, financial intermediation as it relates to securities investments - for example, the structure of brokerage and mutual fund industries, and analyses of short and long run horizon price behaviour. The journal strives to maintain a balance between theoretical and empirical work, and aims to provide prompt and constructive reviews to paper submitters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信