以设计健康素养转变卫生系统:呈现40-20-40的数字发展模式

Lars Münter , Danielle Drachmann , Mouna Ghanem , Yvonne Prinzellner , Carolien Smits , Katharina Werner , Vera Bulsink , Isabel Schwaninger , Lex Van Velsen , Nicolaj Holm Faber
{"title":"以设计健康素养转变卫生系统:呈现40-20-40的数字发展模式","authors":"Lars Münter ,&nbsp;Danielle Drachmann ,&nbsp;Mouna Ghanem ,&nbsp;Yvonne Prinzellner ,&nbsp;Carolien Smits ,&nbsp;Katharina Werner ,&nbsp;Vera Bulsink ,&nbsp;Isabel Schwaninger ,&nbsp;Lex Van Velsen ,&nbsp;Nicolaj Holm Faber","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2023.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Intro</h3><p>Digital tools and services are becoming the standard for delivery of health care, especially hastened by the restrictions and needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. While early experiences with telemedicine have been a foundation for modern day digital tool development, the use of co-creation, user meta dialogue, and follow up services are often short and few. This represents a powerful potential for designing upcoming services for a multi-level platform. This requires, however, equity in digital health literacy, which is often not the case. Rather than seeing effect or impact as the outcome of the service itself, the value of including and referencing user expectations before and after the session holds an even stronger value; therefore we've explored and created a new co-design approach to digital development we call the 40-20-40 model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using the 40-20-40 approach we focus on early user communication and input as a part of the specific session or service design, a <em>prologue-phase</em>, that gathers vital input to align expectations. After the specific <em>intervention-phase</em>, we utilise the <em>epilogue-phas</em>e as an extension of the intervention itself, an echo of the prologue, and a gathering of user outcomes. We believe the pro- and epilogue phases represent a total of 80% of the overall impact of our services. We also argue that digital developers and public health service providers would benefit from a stronger use of this design model to improve the quality of care and the use and impact of care services, in particular for patients with limited digital health literacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72670,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transforming health systems with design health literacy: Presenting the 40-20-40 model for digital development\",\"authors\":\"Lars Münter ,&nbsp;Danielle Drachmann ,&nbsp;Mouna Ghanem ,&nbsp;Yvonne Prinzellner ,&nbsp;Carolien Smits ,&nbsp;Katharina Werner ,&nbsp;Vera Bulsink ,&nbsp;Isabel Schwaninger ,&nbsp;Lex Van Velsen ,&nbsp;Nicolaj Holm Faber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2023.100122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Intro</h3><p>Digital tools and services are becoming the standard for delivery of health care, especially hastened by the restrictions and needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. While early experiences with telemedicine have been a foundation for modern day digital tool development, the use of co-creation, user meta dialogue, and follow up services are often short and few. This represents a powerful potential for designing upcoming services for a multi-level platform. This requires, however, equity in digital health literacy, which is often not the case. Rather than seeing effect or impact as the outcome of the service itself, the value of including and referencing user expectations before and after the session holds an even stronger value; therefore we've explored and created a new co-design approach to digital development we call the 40-20-40 model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using the 40-20-40 approach we focus on early user communication and input as a part of the specific session or service design, a <em>prologue-phase</em>, that gathers vital input to align expectations. After the specific <em>intervention-phase</em>, we utilise the <em>epilogue-phas</em>e as an extension of the intervention itself, an echo of the prologue, and a gathering of user outcomes. We believe the pro- and epilogue phases represent a total of 80% of the overall impact of our services. We also argue that digital developers and public health service providers would benefit from a stronger use of this design model to improve the quality of care and the use and impact of care services, in particular for patients with limited digital health literacy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990023000307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990023000307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

IntroDigital工具和服务正在成为提供医疗保健的标准,尤其是在新冠肺炎大流行期间的限制和需求加速了这一趋势。虽然远程医疗的早期经验是现代数字工具开发的基础,但联合创建、用户元对话和后续服务的使用往往很短,而且很少。这代表了为多层次平台设计即将推出的服务的强大潜力。然而,这需要数字健康知识的公平性,而事实往往并非如此。与其将效果或影响视为服务本身的结果,不如在会话前后包含和引用用户期望的价值更大;因此,我们探索并创建了一种新的数字开发联合设计方法,我们称之为40-20-40模型。结果使用40-20-40方法,我们将重点放在早期用户沟通和输入上,将其作为特定会话或服务设计的一部分,即序言阶段,收集重要输入以调整预期。在特定的干预阶段之后,我们将结语阶段作为干预本身的延伸、序言的回声和用户结果的集合。我们相信,前期和收尾阶段占我们服务总体影响的80%。我们还认为,数字开发者和公共卫生服务提供商将从更有力地使用这种设计模式中受益,以提高护理质量以及护理服务的使用和影响,特别是对于数字健康素养有限的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transforming health systems with design health literacy: Presenting the 40-20-40 model for digital development

Intro

Digital tools and services are becoming the standard for delivery of health care, especially hastened by the restrictions and needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. While early experiences with telemedicine have been a foundation for modern day digital tool development, the use of co-creation, user meta dialogue, and follow up services are often short and few. This represents a powerful potential for designing upcoming services for a multi-level platform. This requires, however, equity in digital health literacy, which is often not the case. Rather than seeing effect or impact as the outcome of the service itself, the value of including and referencing user expectations before and after the session holds an even stronger value; therefore we've explored and created a new co-design approach to digital development we call the 40-20-40 model.

Results

Using the 40-20-40 approach we focus on early user communication and input as a part of the specific session or service design, a prologue-phase, that gathers vital input to align expectations. After the specific intervention-phase, we utilise the epilogue-phase as an extension of the intervention itself, an echo of the prologue, and a gathering of user outcomes. We believe the pro- and epilogue phases represent a total of 80% of the overall impact of our services. We also argue that digital developers and public health service providers would benefit from a stronger use of this design model to improve the quality of care and the use and impact of care services, in particular for patients with limited digital health literacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信