机器人同步切除直肠癌和肝转移:目前的证据和回顾

A. Pathanki , S. Bhanderi , A. Bajwa , J. Ahmad
{"title":"机器人同步切除直肠癌和肝转移:目前的证据和回顾","authors":"A. Pathanki ,&nbsp;S. Bhanderi ,&nbsp;A. Bajwa ,&nbsp;J. Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Synchronous rectal and liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer offers a unique opportunity to treat patients with a single stage procedure. Traditional open resections were out of favour due to a high morbidity profile. Robotic resections offer these benefits with an apparent reduction in morbidity and similar oncological outcomes. The present review aims to ascertain the feasibility, safety and available outcomes for patients undergoing synchronous resections for rectal cancer with liver metastases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed along the PRISMA guidelines with “robotic”, “rectal cancer”, “colorectal”, “synchronous resection” and “liver metastases” as the key words on the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Appropriate studies published between May 1<sup>st</sup> 2015 and May 1<sup>st</sup> 2023 were chosen and the data were collated from individual patients and analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 12 studies were included, comprising of 48 patients. Eight included studies were case series and the rest were case reports and brief communications. There were no appropriate prospective studies for analysis. The median age was 61 years (IQR- 55–73 years) and 80% of patients whose gender data were available (n-15) were men. The median operative duration was 376 ​min (IQR- 312–424 min) with estimated blood loss of 175 ​ml (125–225 ​ml). The median length of hospital stay was 5.5 days (IQR- 3.5-7). There was no mortality and all the resections were R0.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Synchronous robotic resections for rectal cancer with liver metastases is feasible on the current review and has good short term and peri-operative outcomes. However, there is paucity of high quality published data in this subset of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of the current review and to resolve the lack of high quality evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic synchronous resection of rectal cancer and liver metastases: Current evidence and review\",\"authors\":\"A. Pathanki ,&nbsp;S. Bhanderi ,&nbsp;A. Bajwa ,&nbsp;J. Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Synchronous rectal and liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer offers a unique opportunity to treat patients with a single stage procedure. Traditional open resections were out of favour due to a high morbidity profile. Robotic resections offer these benefits with an apparent reduction in morbidity and similar oncological outcomes. The present review aims to ascertain the feasibility, safety and available outcomes for patients undergoing synchronous resections for rectal cancer with liver metastases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was performed along the PRISMA guidelines with “robotic”, “rectal cancer”, “colorectal”, “synchronous resection” and “liver metastases” as the key words on the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Appropriate studies published between May 1<sup>st</sup> 2015 and May 1<sup>st</sup> 2023 were chosen and the data were collated from individual patients and analysed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 12 studies were included, comprising of 48 patients. Eight included studies were case series and the rest were case reports and brief communications. There were no appropriate prospective studies for analysis. The median age was 61 years (IQR- 55–73 years) and 80% of patients whose gender data were available (n-15) were men. The median operative duration was 376 ​min (IQR- 312–424 min) with estimated blood loss of 175 ​ml (125–225 ​ml). The median length of hospital stay was 5.5 days (IQR- 3.5-7). There was no mortality and all the resections were R0.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Synchronous robotic resections for rectal cancer with liver metastases is feasible on the current review and has good short term and peri-operative outcomes. However, there is paucity of high quality published data in this subset of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of the current review and to resolve the lack of high quality evidence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言同步直肠和肝脏切除治疗转移性结直肠癌癌症提供了一个独特的机会,以单阶段程序治疗患者。传统的开放式切除术由于发病率高而失宠。机器人切除提供了这些好处,明显降低了发病率和类似的肿瘤学结果。本综述旨在确定同步切除癌症肝转移患者的可行性、安全性和有效结果。方法在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库中,以“机器人”、“癌症”、“结直肠”、“同步切除”和“肝转移”为关键词,按照PRISMA指南进行系统回顾。选择了2015年5月1日至2023年5月31日期间发表的适当研究,并对个别患者的数据进行了整理和分析。结果共纳入12项研究,包括48名患者。其中8项研究为病例系列,其余为病例报告和简短交流。没有合适的前瞻性研究可供分析。中位年龄为61岁(IQR-55-73岁),80%的性别数据可用的患者(n-15)为男性。中位手术时间为376​分钟(IQR-312–424分钟),估计失血175​毫升(125–225​ml)。中位住院时间为5.5天(IQR-3.5-7)。无死亡,所有切除均为R0。结论根据目前的综述,同步机器人切除伴有肝转移的癌症是可行的,并且具有良好的短期和围手术期结果。然而,这部分患者缺乏高质量的已发表数据。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实当前审查的结果,并解决缺乏高质量证据的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic synchronous resection of rectal cancer and liver metastases: Current evidence and review

Introduction

Synchronous rectal and liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer offers a unique opportunity to treat patients with a single stage procedure. Traditional open resections were out of favour due to a high morbidity profile. Robotic resections offer these benefits with an apparent reduction in morbidity and similar oncological outcomes. The present review aims to ascertain the feasibility, safety and available outcomes for patients undergoing synchronous resections for rectal cancer with liver metastases.

Methods

A systematic review was performed along the PRISMA guidelines with “robotic”, “rectal cancer”, “colorectal”, “synchronous resection” and “liver metastases” as the key words on the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Appropriate studies published between May 1st 2015 and May 1st 2023 were chosen and the data were collated from individual patients and analysed.

Results

A total of 12 studies were included, comprising of 48 patients. Eight included studies were case series and the rest were case reports and brief communications. There were no appropriate prospective studies for analysis. The median age was 61 years (IQR- 55–73 years) and 80% of patients whose gender data were available (n-15) were men. The median operative duration was 376 ​min (IQR- 312–424 min) with estimated blood loss of 175 ​ml (125–225 ​ml). The median length of hospital stay was 5.5 days (IQR- 3.5-7). There was no mortality and all the resections were R0.

Conclusion

Synchronous robotic resections for rectal cancer with liver metastases is feasible on the current review and has good short term and peri-operative outcomes. However, there is paucity of high quality published data in this subset of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of the current review and to resolve the lack of high quality evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信