深入了解废铸造砂作为混凝土中细骨料的部分或全部替代的观点

Sunit Kumar , Rahul Silori , Susanta Kumar Sethy
{"title":"深入了解废铸造砂作为混凝土中细骨料的部分或全部替代的观点","authors":"Sunit Kumar ,&nbsp;Rahul Silori ,&nbsp;Susanta Kumar Sethy","doi":"10.1016/j.totert.2023.100048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Lately, the rapid decrease of natural resources has aroused the need for sustainable alternatives in every sector of the world. Likely, the consideration of sustainable materials in the construction sector has become imperative for its long-term survival. Waste<!--> <!-->foundry sand (WFS), a by-product of the metal casting industries (ferrous and non-ferrous) is a viable alternative to replace natural sand in concrete. In this regard, various literature have reported WFS replacement in structural concrete in the last few decades. The present review extensively targets the suitability perspective of WFS replacement in concrete, specifically portraying a comparison of partial and full replacements with critical limitations for use in concrete. The review found that the partial optimum replacement level is in the range of 20–30% by weight with desirable mechanical properties and further increase in replacements tends to degrade the major mechanical properties of the concrete. In contrast, full replacement reported to reduce the workability and compressive strength of the concrete, thus making the replacement inappropriate for making structural concrete members. In essence, owing to the varied sources of generation of WFS and limited reports, further possibility of evaluating more results about durability and dynamic properties is feasible to make pertinent conclusions regarding the use of WFS in sustainable concrete development. As a current research gap, the study also recommended the use of strength enhancing waste products/low-cost additives at full replacement and agglomerate of waste foundry and other waste materials as a sand substitute could be explored for better and sustainable concrete production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101255,"journal":{"name":"Total Environment Research Themes","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insight into the perspectives of waste foundry sand as a partial or full replacement of fine aggregate in concrete\",\"authors\":\"Sunit Kumar ,&nbsp;Rahul Silori ,&nbsp;Susanta Kumar Sethy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.totert.2023.100048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Lately, the rapid decrease of natural resources has aroused the need for sustainable alternatives in every sector of the world. Likely, the consideration of sustainable materials in the construction sector has become imperative for its long-term survival. Waste<!--> <!-->foundry sand (WFS), a by-product of the metal casting industries (ferrous and non-ferrous) is a viable alternative to replace natural sand in concrete. In this regard, various literature have reported WFS replacement in structural concrete in the last few decades. The present review extensively targets the suitability perspective of WFS replacement in concrete, specifically portraying a comparison of partial and full replacements with critical limitations for use in concrete. The review found that the partial optimum replacement level is in the range of 20–30% by weight with desirable mechanical properties and further increase in replacements tends to degrade the major mechanical properties of the concrete. In contrast, full replacement reported to reduce the workability and compressive strength of the concrete, thus making the replacement inappropriate for making structural concrete members. In essence, owing to the varied sources of generation of WFS and limited reports, further possibility of evaluating more results about durability and dynamic properties is feasible to make pertinent conclusions regarding the use of WFS in sustainable concrete development. As a current research gap, the study also recommended the use of strength enhancing waste products/low-cost additives at full replacement and agglomerate of waste foundry and other waste materials as a sand substitute could be explored for better and sustainable concrete production.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Total Environment Research Themes\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Total Environment Research Themes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772809923000254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Total Environment Research Themes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772809923000254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近,自然资源的迅速减少引起了世界各部门对可持续替代品的需求。很可能,建筑行业对可持续材料的考虑已成为其长期生存的当务之急。废铸造砂(WFS)是金属铸造行业(含铁和有色金属)的副产品,是替代混凝土中天然砂的可行替代品。在这方面,在过去几十年中,各种文献报道了结构混凝土中WFS的替代。本综述广泛针对混凝土中WFS替代物的适用性观点,特别描述了部分和全部替代物与混凝土中使用的关键限制的比较。审查发现,部分最佳更换水平在20–30%(重量)的范围内,具有理想的机械性能,更换次数的进一步增加往往会降低混凝土的主要机械性能。相比之下,据报道,完全更换会降低混凝土的工作性和抗压强度,从而使更换不适合制造结构混凝土构件。本质上,由于WFS的产生来源多种多样,报告有限,进一步评估更多耐久性和动态性能结果的可能性是可行的,以便就WFS在可持续混凝土开发中的应用得出相关结论。作为目前的一个研究空白,该研究还建议在完全替代和聚集废铸造厂和其他废料时使用增强强度的废物/低成本添加剂作为沙子替代品,以更好和可持续地生产混凝土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insight into the perspectives of waste foundry sand as a partial or full replacement of fine aggregate in concrete

Lately, the rapid decrease of natural resources has aroused the need for sustainable alternatives in every sector of the world. Likely, the consideration of sustainable materials in the construction sector has become imperative for its long-term survival. Waste foundry sand (WFS), a by-product of the metal casting industries (ferrous and non-ferrous) is a viable alternative to replace natural sand in concrete. In this regard, various literature have reported WFS replacement in structural concrete in the last few decades. The present review extensively targets the suitability perspective of WFS replacement in concrete, specifically portraying a comparison of partial and full replacements with critical limitations for use in concrete. The review found that the partial optimum replacement level is in the range of 20–30% by weight with desirable mechanical properties and further increase in replacements tends to degrade the major mechanical properties of the concrete. In contrast, full replacement reported to reduce the workability and compressive strength of the concrete, thus making the replacement inappropriate for making structural concrete members. In essence, owing to the varied sources of generation of WFS and limited reports, further possibility of evaluating more results about durability and dynamic properties is feasible to make pertinent conclusions regarding the use of WFS in sustainable concrete development. As a current research gap, the study also recommended the use of strength enhancing waste products/low-cost additives at full replacement and agglomerate of waste foundry and other waste materials as a sand substitute could be explored for better and sustainable concrete production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信