教育双语:儿童认知和语言发展纵向研究的思考

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Gloria Chamorro , Vikki Janke
{"title":"教育双语:儿童认知和语言发展纵向研究的思考","authors":"Gloria Chamorro ,&nbsp;Vikki Janke","doi":"10.1016/j.amper.2023.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Our longitudinal study examined the cognitive and linguistic development of bilingually-educated, yet monolingually-raised, Spanish children, exploring (a) whether bilingual education procured a bilingual advantage, (b) whether greater L2 exposure was key to producing it, and (c) how development proceeded over time.</p><p>We compared three groups of children in Years 1 and 2 of primary education in Spain: one attending monolingual education (MON), and two attending English-Spanish bilingual education, where one group received higher exposure (HiEx) and the other lower exposure (LoEx) to English. Children were tested in their schools on attention and L1 and L2 vocabulary skills, as well as several background measures.</p><p>Across both years, the groups differed in their English vocabulary: HiEx outperformed LoEx and MON (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and LoEx outperformed MON (<em>p</em> = 0.02) but there were no differences in the children's L1 vocabulary scores. After one year of schooling, bilingually-educated children scored higher than MON on certain cognitive skills (interference suppression, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; response inhibition, <em>p</em> = 0.02) but these differences did not materialise after a second year. The present paper combines these results from our two previously published studies with other current literature on educational bilingualism into a discussion on how future work on this population could progress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35076,"journal":{"name":"Ampersand","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational bilingualism: Reflections on a longitudinal study of children's cognitive and linguistic development\",\"authors\":\"Gloria Chamorro ,&nbsp;Vikki Janke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amper.2023.100115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Our longitudinal study examined the cognitive and linguistic development of bilingually-educated, yet monolingually-raised, Spanish children, exploring (a) whether bilingual education procured a bilingual advantage, (b) whether greater L2 exposure was key to producing it, and (c) how development proceeded over time.</p><p>We compared three groups of children in Years 1 and 2 of primary education in Spain: one attending monolingual education (MON), and two attending English-Spanish bilingual education, where one group received higher exposure (HiEx) and the other lower exposure (LoEx) to English. Children were tested in their schools on attention and L1 and L2 vocabulary skills, as well as several background measures.</p><p>Across both years, the groups differed in their English vocabulary: HiEx outperformed LoEx and MON (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and LoEx outperformed MON (<em>p</em> = 0.02) but there were no differences in the children's L1 vocabulary scores. After one year of schooling, bilingually-educated children scored higher than MON on certain cognitive skills (interference suppression, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; response inhibition, <em>p</em> = 0.02) but these differences did not materialise after a second year. The present paper combines these results from our two previously published studies with other current literature on educational bilingualism into a discussion on how future work on this population could progress.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ampersand\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ampersand\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039023000073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ampersand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215039023000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们的纵向研究考察了受过双语教育但受过单语教育的西班牙儿童的认知和语言发展,探讨了(a)双语教育是否获得了双语优势,(b)更多的二语接触是否是产生双语优势的关键,以及(c)发展是如何随着时间的推移而进行的。我们比较了西班牙小学一年级和二年级的三组儿童:一组接受单语教育(MON),两组接受英西双语教育,其中一组接受了较高的英语水平(HiEx),另一组接受的英语水平较低(LoEx)。孩子们在学校接受了注意力、一、二级词汇技能以及一些背景测量的测试。在这两年中,两组的英语词汇有所不同:HiEx的表现优于LoEx和MON(p<0.001),LoEx的表现高于MON(p=0.02),但儿童的L1词汇得分没有差异。上学一年后,接受双语教育的儿童在某些认知技能上的得分高于MON(干扰抑制,p<0.001;反应抑制,p=0.02),但这些差异在第二年后没有出现。本文将我们之前发表的两项研究的这些结果与其他当前关于教育双语的文献结合起来,讨论未来如何在这一人群中取得进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational bilingualism: Reflections on a longitudinal study of children's cognitive and linguistic development

Our longitudinal study examined the cognitive and linguistic development of bilingually-educated, yet monolingually-raised, Spanish children, exploring (a) whether bilingual education procured a bilingual advantage, (b) whether greater L2 exposure was key to producing it, and (c) how development proceeded over time.

We compared three groups of children in Years 1 and 2 of primary education in Spain: one attending monolingual education (MON), and two attending English-Spanish bilingual education, where one group received higher exposure (HiEx) and the other lower exposure (LoEx) to English. Children were tested in their schools on attention and L1 and L2 vocabulary skills, as well as several background measures.

Across both years, the groups differed in their English vocabulary: HiEx outperformed LoEx and MON (p < 0.001), and LoEx outperformed MON (p = 0.02) but there were no differences in the children's L1 vocabulary scores. After one year of schooling, bilingually-educated children scored higher than MON on certain cognitive skills (interference suppression, p < 0.001; response inhibition, p = 0.02) but these differences did not materialise after a second year. The present paper combines these results from our two previously published studies with other current literature on educational bilingualism into a discussion on how future work on this population could progress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ampersand
Ampersand Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信